0.13/0.13 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.13/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 1200 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 120 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Jul 13 14:59:06 EDT 2021 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime : 0.13/0.38 # No SInE strategy applied 0.13/0.38 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN 0.13/0.38 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn. 0.13/0.38 # 0.13/0.38 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.13/0.38 # Number of axioms: 4 Number of unprocessed: 4 0.13/0.38 # Tableaux proof search. 0.13/0.38 # APR header successfully linked. 0.13/0.38 # Hello from C++ 0.13/0.38 # The folding up rule is enabled... 0.13/0.38 # Local unification is enabled... 0.13/0.38 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... 0.13/0.38 # 4 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification 0.13/0.38 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures. 0.13/0.38 # There are 1 start rule candidates: 0.13/0.38 # Found 4 unit axioms. 0.13/0.38 # 1 start rule tableaux created. 0.13/0.38 # 0 extension rule candidate clauses 0.13/0.38 # 4 unit axiom clauses 0.13/0.38 0.13/0.38 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. 0.13/0.38 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1 0.13/0.38 # Creating equality axioms 0.13/0.38 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses 0.13/0.38 # Returning from population with 12 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. 0.13/0.38 # We now have 12 tableaux to operate on 177.59/22.75 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. 177.59/22.75 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. 177.59/22.75 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. 177.59/22.75 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. 177.59/22.75 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. 177.59/22.75 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. 177.59/22.75 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. 177.59/22.75 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. 177.59/22.75 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 177.59/22.75 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 177.59/22.75 # Begin clausification derivation 177.59/22.75 177.59/22.75 # End clausification derivation 177.59/22.75 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion 177.59/22.75 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3)=X2)). 177.59/22.75 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,equivalent(equivalent(X2,equivalent(X3,X1)),equivalent(X3,X2))))=true)). 177.59/22.75 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (ifeq(is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X2)),true,ifeq(is_a_theorem(X1),true,is_a_theorem(X2),true),true)=true)). 177.59/22.75 cnf(i_0_7, negated_conjecture, (is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,equivalent(b,c)),c),equivalent(b,a)))!=true)). 177.59/22.75 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (X4=X4)). 177.59/22.75 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! 177.59/22.75 # Begin printing tableau 177.59/22.75 # Found 6 steps 177.59/22.75 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (ifeq(X10,X10,X5,X8)=X5), inference(start_rule)). 177.59/22.75 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (ifeq(X10,X10,X5,X8)=X5), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_15])). 177.59/22.75 cnf(i_0_36, plain, (ifeq(X1,X1,X7,X3)!=X7), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_5])). 177.59/22.75 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (equivalent(ifeq(X10,X10,X5,X8),ifeq(X1,X1,X7,X3))=equivalent(X5,X7)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_13])). 177.59/22.75 cnf(i_0_45, plain, (equivalent(X5,X7)!=ifeq(X1,X1,equivalent(X5,X7),X3)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_5])). 177.59/22.75 cnf(i_0_43, plain, (equivalent(ifeq(X10,X10,X5,X8),ifeq(X1,X1,X7,X3))=ifeq(X1,X1,equivalent(X5,X7),X3)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_43, ...])). 177.59/22.75 # End printing tableau 177.59/22.75 # SZS output end 177.59/22.75 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" 177.59/22.80 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. 177.59/22.80 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. 177.59/22.80 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. 177.59/22.80 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. 177.59/22.80 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. 177.59/22.80 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. 177.59/22.80 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. 177.59/22.80 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. 177.59/22.80 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 177.59/22.80 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 177.59/22.80 # Begin clausification derivation 177.59/22.80 177.59/22.80 # End clausification derivation 177.59/22.80 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion 177.59/22.80 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3)=X2)). 177.59/22.80 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,equivalent(equivalent(X2,equivalent(X3,X1)),equivalent(X3,X2))))=true)). 177.59/22.80 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (ifeq(is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X2)),true,ifeq(is_a_theorem(X1),true,is_a_theorem(X2),true),true)=true)). 177.59/22.80 cnf(i_0_7, negated_conjecture, (is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,equivalent(b,c)),c),equivalent(b,a)))!=true)). 177.59/22.80 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (X4=X4)). 177.59/22.80 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! 177.59/22.80 # Begin printing tableau 177.59/22.80 # Found 6 steps 177.59/22.80 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (ifeq(X13,X13,X7,X11)=X7), inference(start_rule)). 177.59/22.80 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (ifeq(X13,X13,X7,X11)=X7), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_15])). 177.59/22.80 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (ifeq(X1,X1,X5,X3)!=X5), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_5])). 177.59/22.80 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (equivalent(ifeq(X1,X1,X5,X3),ifeq(X13,X13,X7,X11))=equivalent(X5,X7)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_13])). 177.59/22.80 cnf(i_0_45, plain, (equivalent(X5,X7)!=ifeq(X1,X1,equivalent(X5,X7),X3)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_5])). 177.59/22.80 cnf(i_0_43, plain, (equivalent(ifeq(X1,X1,X5,X3),ifeq(X13,X13,X7,X11))=ifeq(X1,X1,equivalent(X5,X7),X3)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_43, ...])). 177.59/22.80 # End printing tableau 177.59/22.80 # SZS output end 177.59/22.80 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" 178.03/22.82 # Child (15349) has found a proof. 178.03/22.82 178.03/22.82 # Proof search is over... 178.03/22.82 # Freeing feature tree 178.03/22.97 EOF