0.00/0.12 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.12/0.12 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 1200 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 120 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jul 13 11:46:06 EDT 2021 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : 0.19/0.36 # No SInE strategy applied 0.19/0.36 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN 0.19/0.36 # and selection function PSelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn. 0.19/0.36 # 0.19/0.36 # Number of axioms: 15 Number of unprocessed: 15 0.19/0.36 # Tableaux proof search. 0.19/0.36 # APR header successfully linked. 0.19/0.36 # Hello from C++ 0.19/0.36 # The folding up rule is enabled... 0.19/0.36 # Local unification is enabled... 0.19/0.36 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... 0.19/0.36 # 15 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification 0.19/0.36 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures. 0.19/0.36 # There are 1 start rule candidates: 0.19/0.36 # Found 15 unit axioms. 0.19/0.36 # 1 start rule tableaux created. 0.19/0.36 # 0 extension rule candidate clauses 0.19/0.36 # 15 unit axiom clauses 0.19/0.36 0.19/0.36 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. 0.19/0.36 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1 0.19/0.36 # Creating equality axioms 0.19/0.36 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses 0.19/0.36 # Returning from population with 26 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. 0.19/0.36 # We now have 26 tableaux to operate on 0.19/0.45 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. 0.19/0.45 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. 0.19/0.45 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. 0.19/0.45 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. 0.19/0.45 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. 0.19/0.45 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. 0.19/0.45 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. 0.19/0.45 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. 0.19/0.45 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.19/0.45 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.19/0.45 # Begin clausification derivation 0.19/0.45 0.19/0.45 # End clausification derivation 0.19/0.45 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion 0.19/0.45 cnf(i_0_25, hypothesis, (meet(b,a)=a)). 0.19/0.45 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (meet(X1,X1)=X1)). 0.19/0.45 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (join(X1,X1)=X1)). 0.19/0.45 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (join(X1,complement(X1))=one)). 0.19/0.45 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (meet(X1,complement(X1))=zero)). 0.19/0.45 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (join(X1,X2)=join(X2,X1))). 0.19/0.45 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (meet(X1,X2)=meet(X2,X1))). 0.19/0.45 cnf(i_0_27, negated_conjecture, (join(complement(b),complement(a))!=complement(a))). 0.19/0.45 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (join(X1,meet(X1,X2))=X1)). 0.19/0.45 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (meet(X1,join(X1,X2))=X1)). 0.19/0.45 cnf(i_0_30, plain, (join(join(X1,X2),X3)=join(X1,join(X2,X3)))). 0.19/0.45 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (meet(meet(X1,X2),X3)=meet(X1,meet(X2,X3)))). 0.19/0.45 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (ifeq(X2,X2,X1,X3)=X1)). 0.19/0.45 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (meet(X1,join(X2,join(meet(X1,X3),meet(X3,X4))))=meet(X1,join(X2,meet(X3,join(X1,X4)))))). 0.19/0.45 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (ifeq(join(X2,X1),one,ifeq(meet(X2,X1),zero,complement(X2),X1),X1)=X1)). 0.19/0.45 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (X5=X5)). 0.19/0.45 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! 0.19/0.45 # Begin printing tableau 0.19/0.45 # Found 6 steps 0.19/0.45 cnf(i_0_25, hypothesis, (meet(b,a)=a), inference(start_rule)). 0.19/0.45 cnf(i_0_40, plain, (meet(b,a)=a), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_38])). 0.19/0.45 cnf(i_0_69, plain, (meet(b,a)!=a), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_25])). 0.19/0.45 cnf(i_0_68, plain, (meet(meet(b,a),meet(b,a))=meet(a,a)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_35])). 0.19/0.45 cnf(i_0_82, plain, (meet(a,a)!=a), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_17])). 0.19/0.45 cnf(i_0_80, plain, (meet(meet(b,a),meet(b,a))=a), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_80, ...])). 0.19/0.45 # End printing tableau 0.19/0.45 # SZS output end 0.19/0.45 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" 0.19/0.45 # Child (26504) has found a proof. 0.19/0.45 0.19/0.45 # Proof search is over... 0.19/0.45 # Freeing feature tree 0.19/0.45 EOF