0.05/0.10 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.05/0.11 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s 0.11/0.31 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu 0.11/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.11/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.11/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.11/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.11/0.31 % CPULimit : 1200 0.11/0.31 % WCLimit : 120 0.11/0.31 % DateTime : Tue Jul 13 11:51:27 EDT 2021 0.11/0.31 % CPUTime : 0.15/0.34 # No SInE strategy applied 0.15/0.34 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___209_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0Y 0.15/0.34 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred. 0.15/0.34 # 0.15/0.34 # Number of axioms: 2 Number of unprocessed: 2 0.15/0.34 # Tableaux proof search. 0.15/0.34 # APR header successfully linked. 0.15/0.34 # Hello from C++ 0.15/0.34 # The folding up rule is enabled... 0.15/0.34 # Local unification is enabled... 0.15/0.34 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... 0.15/0.34 # 2 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification 0.15/0.34 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures. 0.15/0.34 # There are 1 start rule candidates: 0.15/0.34 # Found 2 unit axioms. 0.15/0.34 # 1 start rule tableaux created. 0.15/0.34 # 0 extension rule candidate clauses 0.15/0.34 # 2 unit axiom clauses 0.15/0.34 0.15/0.34 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. 0.15/0.34 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1 0.15/0.34 # Creating equality axioms 0.15/0.34 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses 0.15/0.34 # Returning from population with 9 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. 0.15/0.34 # We now have 9 tableaux to operate on 0.15/0.37 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. 0.15/0.37 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. 0.15/0.37 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. 0.15/0.37 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. 0.15/0.37 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. 0.15/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. 0.15/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. 0.15/0.37 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. 0.15/0.37 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.15/0.37 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.15/0.37 # Begin clausification derivation 0.15/0.37 0.15/0.37 # End clausification derivation 0.15/0.37 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion 0.15/0.37 cnf(i_0_4, negated_conjecture, (join(a,a)!=a)). 0.15/0.37 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (join(meet(join(meet(X2,X1),meet(X1,join(X2,X1))),X3),meet(join(meet(X2,join(join(meet(X1,X4),meet(X5,X1)),X1)),meet(join(meet(X1,meet(meet(join(X1,X4),join(X5,X1)),X1)),meet(X6,join(X1,meet(meet(join(X1,X4),join(X5,X1)),X1)))),join(X2,join(join(meet(X1,X4),meet(X5,X1)),X1)))),join(join(meet(X2,X1),meet(X1,join(X2,X1))),X3)))=X1)). 0.15/0.37 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (X7=X7)). 0.15/0.37 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! 0.15/0.37 # Begin printing tableau 0.15/0.37 # Found 9 steps 0.15/0.37 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (X10=X10), inference(start_rule)). 0.15/0.37 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (X10=X10), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_10])). 0.15/0.37 cnf(i_0_609, plain, ($false), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_6])). 0.15/0.37 cnf(i_0_607, plain, (meet(X10,X6)=meet(X10,X6)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_9])). 0.15/0.37 cnf(i_0_610, plain, (meet(X10,X6)=meet(X10,X6)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_11])). 0.15/0.37 cnf(i_0_615, plain, ($false), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_6])). 0.15/0.37 cnf(i_0_612, plain, ($false), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_8])). 0.15/0.37 cnf(i_0_617, plain, ($false), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_6])). 0.15/0.37 cnf(i_0_613, plain, (join(meet(X10,X6),X4)=join(meet(X10,X6),X4)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_613, ...])). 0.15/0.37 # End printing tableau 0.15/0.37 # SZS output end 0.15/0.37 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" 0.15/0.37 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. 0.15/0.37 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. 0.15/0.37 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. 0.15/0.37 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. 0.15/0.37 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. 0.15/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. 0.15/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. 0.15/0.37 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. 0.15/0.37 # Child (30402) has found a proof. 0.15/0.37 0.15/0.37 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.15/0.37 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.15/0.37 # Begin clausification derivation 0.15/0.37 0.15/0.37 # End clausification derivation 0.15/0.37 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion 0.15/0.37 cnf(i_0_4, negated_conjecture, (join(a,a)!=a)). 0.15/0.37 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (join(meet(join(meet(X2,X1),meet(X1,join(X2,X1))),X3),meet(join(meet(X2,join(join(meet(X1,X4),meet(X5,X1)),X1)),meet(join(meet(X1,meet(meet(join(X1,X4),join(X5,X1)),X1)),meet(X6,join(X1,meet(meet(join(X1,X4),join(X5,X1)),X1)))),join(X2,join(join(meet(X1,X4),meet(X5,X1)),X1)))),join(join(meet(X2,X1),meet(X1,join(X2,X1))),X3)))=X1)). 0.15/0.37 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (X7=X7)). 0.15/0.37 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! 0.15/0.37 # Begin printing tableau 0.15/0.37 # Found 6 steps 0.15/0.37 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (join(meet(join(meet(X16,a),meet(a,join(X16,a))),X15),meet(join(meet(X16,join(join(meet(a,X14),meet(X13,a)),a)),meet(join(meet(a,meet(meet(join(a,X14),join(X13,a)),a)),meet(X12,join(a,meet(meet(join(a,X14),join(X13,a)),a)))),join(X16,join(join(meet(a,X14),meet(X13,a)),a)))),join(join(meet(X16,a),meet(a,join(X16,a))),X15)))=a), inference(start_rule)). 0.15/0.37 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (join(meet(join(meet(X16,a),meet(a,join(X16,a))),X15),meet(join(meet(X16,join(join(meet(a,X14),meet(X13,a)),a)),meet(join(meet(a,meet(meet(join(a,X14),join(X13,a)),a)),meet(X12,join(a,meet(meet(join(a,X14),join(X13,a)),a)))),join(X16,join(join(meet(a,X14),meet(X13,a)),a)))),join(join(meet(X16,a),meet(a,join(X16,a))),X15)))=a), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_9])). 0.15/0.37 cnf(i_0_136, plain, (join(a,a)=a), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_4])). 0.15/0.37 cnf(i_0_137, plain, (join(a,a)!=join(meet(join(meet(X16,a),meet(a,join(X16,a))),X15),meet(join(meet(X16,join(join(meet(a,X14),meet(X13,a)),a)),meet(join(meet(a,meet(meet(join(a,X14),join(X13,a)),a)),meet(X12,join(a,meet(meet(join(a,X14),join(X13,a)),a)))),join(X16,join(join(meet(a,X14),meet(X13,a)),a)))),join(join(meet(X16,a),meet(a,join(X16,a))),X15)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_9])). 0.15/0.37 cnf(i_0_222, plain, (join(a,a)!=join(meet(join(meet(X2,join(a,a)),meet(join(a,a),join(X2,join(a,a)))),X3),meet(join(meet(X2,join(join(meet(join(a,a),X4),meet(X5,join(a,a))),join(a,a))),meet(join(meet(join(a,a),meet(meet(join(join(a,a),X4),join(X5,join(a,a))),join(a,a))),meet(X6,join(join(a,a),meet(meet(join(join(a,a),X4),join(X5,join(a,a))),join(a,a))))),join(X2,join(join(meet(join(a,a),X4),meet(X5,join(a,a))),join(a,a))))),join(join(meet(X2,join(a,a)),meet(join(a,a),join(X2,join(a,a)))),X3)))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_3])). 0.15/0.37 cnf(i_0_223, plain, (join(meet(join(meet(X2,join(a,a)),meet(join(a,a),join(X2,join(a,a)))),X3),meet(join(meet(X2,join(join(meet(join(a,a),X4),meet(X5,join(a,a))),join(a,a))),meet(join(meet(join(a,a),meet(meet(join(join(a,a),X4),join(X5,join(a,a))),join(a,a))),meet(X6,join(join(a,a),meet(meet(join(join(a,a),X4),join(X5,join(a,a))),join(a,a))))),join(X2,join(join(meet(join(a,a),X4),meet(X5,join(a,a))),join(a,a))))),join(join(meet(X2,join(a,a)),meet(join(a,a),join(X2,join(a,a)))),X3)))!=join(meet(join(meet(X16,a),meet(a,join(X16,a))),X15),meet(join(meet(X16,join(join(meet(a,X14),meet(X13,a)),a)),meet(join(meet(a,meet(meet(join(a,X14),join(X13,a)),a)),meet(X12,join(a,meet(meet(join(a,X14),join(X13,a)),a)))),join(X16,join(join(meet(a,X14),meet(X13,a)),a)))),join(join(meet(X16,a),meet(a,join(X16,a))),X15)))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_223, ...])). 0.15/0.37 # End printing tableau 0.15/0.37 # SZS output end 0.15/0.37 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" 0.15/0.37 # Proof search is over... 0.15/0.37 # Freeing feature tree 0.15/0.37 EOF