0.13/0.14 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.13/0.14 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 1200 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 120 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Tue Jul 13 12:42:54 EDT 2021 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime : 0.21/0.39 # No SInE strategy applied 0.21/0.39 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___209_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0Y 0.21/0.39 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred. 0.21/0.39 # 0.21/0.39 # Number of axioms: 2 Number of unprocessed: 2 0.21/0.39 # Tableaux proof search. 0.21/0.39 # APR header successfully linked. 0.21/0.39 # Hello from C++ 0.63/0.81 # The folding up rule is enabled... 0.63/0.81 # Local unification is enabled... 0.63/0.81 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... 0.63/0.81 # 2 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification 0.63/0.81 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures. 0.63/0.81 # There are 1 start rule candidates: 0.63/0.81 # Found 2 unit axioms. 0.63/0.81 # 1 start rule tableaux created. 0.63/0.81 # 0 extension rule candidate clauses 0.63/0.81 # 2 unit axiom clauses 0.63/0.81 0.63/0.81 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. 0.63/0.81 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1 0.63/0.81 # Creating equality axioms 0.63/0.81 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses 0.66/0.83 # Returning from population with 8 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. 0.66/0.83 # We now have 8 tableaux to operate on 1.85/1.25 # There were 3 total branch saturation attempts. 1.85/1.25 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. 1.85/1.25 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. 1.85/1.25 # There were 1 free duplicated saturations. 1.85/1.25 # There were 3 total successful branch saturations. 1.85/1.25 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. 1.85/1.25 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. 1.85/1.25 # There were 2 successful branch saturations after the branch. 1.85/1.25 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 1.85/1.25 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 1.85/1.25 # Begin clausification derivation 1.85/1.25 1.85/1.25 # End clausification derivation 1.85/1.25 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion 1.85/1.25 cnf(i_0_3, negated_conjecture, (join(b,a)!=join(a,b))). 1.85/1.25 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (join(meet(join(meet(X1,X2),meet(X2,join(X1,X2))),X3),meet(join(meet(X1,join(join(meet(X4,X2),meet(X2,X5)),X2)),meet(join(meet(X2,meet(meet(join(X4,join(X2,X5)),join(X6,X2)),X2)),meet(X7,join(X2,meet(meet(join(X4,join(X2,X5)),join(X6,X2)),X2)))),join(X1,join(join(meet(X4,X2),meet(X2,X5)),X2)))),join(join(meet(X1,X2),meet(X2,join(X1,X2))),X3)))=X2)). 1.85/1.25 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (X8=X8)). 1.85/1.25 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! 1.85/1.25 # Begin printing tableau 1.85/1.25 # Found 6 steps 1.85/1.25 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (join(meet(join(meet(X18,join(a,b)),meet(join(a,b),join(X18,join(a,b)))),X17),meet(join(meet(X18,join(join(meet(X16,join(a,b)),meet(join(a,b),X15)),join(a,b))),meet(join(meet(join(a,b),meet(meet(join(X16,join(join(a,b),X15)),join(X14,join(a,b))),join(a,b))),meet(X13,join(join(a,b),meet(meet(join(X16,join(join(a,b),X15)),join(X14,join(a,b))),join(a,b))))),join(X18,join(join(meet(X16,join(a,b)),meet(join(a,b),X15)),join(a,b))))),join(join(meet(X18,join(a,b)),meet(join(a,b),join(X18,join(a,b)))),X17)))=join(a,b)), inference(start_rule)). 1.85/1.25 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (join(meet(join(meet(X18,join(a,b)),meet(join(a,b),join(X18,join(a,b)))),X17),meet(join(meet(X18,join(join(meet(X16,join(a,b)),meet(join(a,b),X15)),join(a,b))),meet(join(meet(join(a,b),meet(meet(join(X16,join(join(a,b),X15)),join(X14,join(a,b))),join(a,b))),meet(X13,join(join(a,b),meet(meet(join(X16,join(join(a,b),X15)),join(X14,join(a,b))),join(a,b))))),join(X18,join(join(meet(X16,join(a,b)),meet(join(a,b),X15)),join(a,b))))),join(join(meet(X18,join(a,b)),meet(join(a,b),join(X18,join(a,b)))),X17)))=join(a,b)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_9])). 1.85/1.25 cnf(i_0_113454, plain, (join(b,a)=join(a,b)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_3])). 1.85/1.25 cnf(i_0_113455, plain, (join(b,a)!=join(meet(join(meet(X18,join(a,b)),meet(join(a,b),join(X18,join(a,b)))),X17),meet(join(meet(X18,join(join(meet(X16,join(a,b)),meet(join(a,b),X15)),join(a,b))),meet(join(meet(join(a,b),meet(meet(join(X16,join(join(a,b),X15)),join(X14,join(a,b))),join(a,b))),meet(X13,join(join(a,b),meet(meet(join(X16,join(join(a,b),X15)),join(X14,join(a,b))),join(a,b))))),join(X18,join(join(meet(X16,join(a,b)),meet(join(a,b),X15)),join(a,b))))),join(join(meet(X18,join(a,b)),meet(join(a,b),join(X18,join(a,b)))),X17)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_9])). 1.85/1.25 cnf(i_0_113537, plain, (join(b,a)!=join(meet(join(meet(X1,join(b,a)),meet(join(b,a),join(X1,join(b,a)))),X3),meet(join(meet(X1,join(join(meet(X4,join(b,a)),meet(join(b,a),X5)),join(b,a))),meet(join(meet(join(b,a),meet(meet(join(X4,join(join(b,a),X5)),join(X6,join(b,a))),join(b,a))),meet(X7,join(join(b,a),meet(meet(join(X4,join(join(b,a),X5)),join(X6,join(b,a))),join(b,a))))),join(X1,join(join(meet(X4,join(b,a)),meet(join(b,a),X5)),join(b,a))))),join(join(meet(X1,join(b,a)),meet(join(b,a),join(X1,join(b,a)))),X3)))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_4])). 1.85/1.25 cnf(i_0_113538, plain, (join(meet(join(meet(X1,join(b,a)),meet(join(b,a),join(X1,join(b,a)))),X3),meet(join(meet(X1,join(join(meet(X4,join(b,a)),meet(join(b,a),X5)),join(b,a))),meet(join(meet(join(b,a),meet(meet(join(X4,join(join(b,a),X5)),join(X6,join(b,a))),join(b,a))),meet(X7,join(join(b,a),meet(meet(join(X4,join(join(b,a),X5)),join(X6,join(b,a))),join(b,a))))),join(X1,join(join(meet(X4,join(b,a)),meet(join(b,a),X5)),join(b,a))))),join(join(meet(X1,join(b,a)),meet(join(b,a),join(X1,join(b,a)))),X3)))!=join(meet(join(meet(X18,join(a,b)),meet(join(a,b),join(X18,join(a,b)))),X17),meet(join(meet(X18,join(join(meet(X16,join(a,b)),meet(join(a,b),X15)),join(a,b))),meet(join(meet(join(a,b),meet(meet(join(X16,join(join(a,b),X15)),join(X14,join(a,b))),join(a,b))),meet(X13,join(join(a,b),meet(meet(join(X16,join(join(a,b),X15)),join(X14,join(a,b))),join(a,b))))),join(X18,join(join(meet(X16,join(a,b)),meet(join(a,b),X15)),join(a,b))))),join(join(meet(X18,join(a,b)),meet(join(a,b),join(X18,join(a,b)))),X17)))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_113538, ...])). 1.85/1.25 # End printing tableau 1.85/1.25 # SZS output end 1.85/1.25 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" 1.85/1.25 # Child (10940) has found a proof. 1.85/1.25 1.85/1.25 # Proof search is over... 1.85/1.25 # Freeing feature tree 1.85/1.26 EOF