0.06/0.13 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.06/0.14 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 1200 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 120 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jul 13 10:45:38 EDT 2021 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : 0.18/0.36 # No SInE strategy applied 0.18/0.36 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18C___F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN 0.18/0.36 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn. 0.18/0.36 # 0.18/0.36 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.18/0.36 # Number of axioms: 12 Number of unprocessed: 12 0.18/0.36 # Tableaux proof search. 0.18/0.36 # APR header successfully linked. 0.18/0.36 # Hello from C++ 0.18/0.36 # The folding up rule is enabled... 0.18/0.36 # Local unification is enabled... 0.18/0.36 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... 0.18/0.36 # 12 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification 0.18/0.36 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures. 0.18/0.36 # There are 1 start rule candidates: 0.18/0.36 # Found 12 unit axioms. 0.18/0.36 # 1 start rule tableaux created. 0.18/0.36 # 0 extension rule candidate clauses 0.18/0.36 # 12 unit axiom clauses 0.18/0.36 0.18/0.36 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. 0.18/0.36 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1 0.18/0.36 # Creating equality axioms 0.18/0.36 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses 0.18/0.36 # Returning from population with 21 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. 0.18/0.36 # We now have 21 tableaux to operate on 43.76/5.93 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. 43.76/5.93 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. 43.76/5.93 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. 43.76/5.93 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. 43.76/5.93 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. 43.76/5.93 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. 43.76/5.93 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. 43.76/5.93 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. 43.76/5.93 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 43.76/5.93 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 43.76/5.93 # Begin clausification derivation 43.76/5.93 43.76/5.93 # End clausification derivation 43.76/5.93 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion 43.76/5.93 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (mult(op_c,mult(op_c,mult(op_c,op_c)))=unit)). 43.76/5.93 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (mult(op_d,mult(op_d,mult(op_d,mult(op_d,mult(op_d,mult(op_d,mult(op_d,mult(op_d,op_d))))))))=unit)). 43.76/5.93 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (mult(unit,X1)=X1)). 43.76/5.93 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (mult(X1,unit)=X1)). 43.76/5.93 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (mult(X1,ld(X1,X2))=X2)). 43.76/5.93 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (ld(X1,mult(X1,X2))=X2)). 43.76/5.93 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (rd(mult(X1,X2),X2)=X1)). 43.76/5.93 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (mult(rd(X1,X2),X2)=X1)). 43.76/5.93 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (mult(i(X1),mult(X1,X2))=X2)). 43.76/5.93 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (mult(i(X1),i(X2))=i(mult(X1,X2)))). 43.76/5.93 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (mult(mult(X1,mult(X2,X1)),X3)=mult(X1,mult(X2,mult(X1,X3))))). 43.76/5.93 cnf(i_0_18, negated_conjecture, (mult(op_c,op_d)!=mult(op_d,op_c))). 43.76/5.93 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (X4=X4)). 43.76/5.93 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! 43.76/5.93 # Begin printing tableau 43.76/5.93 # Found 6 steps 43.76/5.93 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (mult(op_c,mult(op_c,mult(op_c,op_c)))=unit), inference(start_rule)). 43.76/5.93 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (mult(op_c,mult(op_c,mult(op_c,op_c)))=unit), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_33])). 43.76/5.93 cnf(i_0_64, plain, (mult(op_c,mult(op_c,mult(op_c,op_c)))!=unit), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_20])). 43.76/5.93 cnf(i_0_62, plain, (rd(mult(op_c,mult(op_c,mult(op_c,op_c))),mult(op_c,mult(op_c,mult(op_c,op_c))))=rd(unit,unit)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_29])). 43.76/5.93 cnf(i_0_71, plain, (rd(unit,unit)!=mult(unit,rd(unit,unit))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_19])). 43.76/5.93 cnf(i_0_69, plain, (rd(mult(op_c,mult(op_c,mult(op_c,op_c))),mult(op_c,mult(op_c,mult(op_c,op_c))))=mult(unit,rd(unit,unit))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_69, ...])). 43.76/5.93 # End printing tableau 43.76/5.93 # SZS output end 43.76/5.93 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" 43.76/5.95 # Child (7931) has found a proof. 43.76/5.95 43.76/5.95 # Proof search is over... 43.76/5.95 # Freeing feature tree 43.76/6.00 EOF