0.08/0.13 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.08/0.14 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 1200 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 120 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Tue Jul 13 13:00:34 EDT 2021 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime : 0.15/0.39 # No SInE strategy applied 0.15/0.39 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN 0.15/0.39 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn. 0.15/0.39 # 0.15/0.39 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.15/0.39 # Number of axioms: 2 Number of unprocessed: 2 0.15/0.39 # Tableaux proof search. 0.15/0.39 # APR header successfully linked. 0.15/0.39 # Hello from C++ 0.15/0.39 # The folding up rule is enabled... 0.15/0.39 # Local unification is enabled... 0.15/0.39 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... 0.15/0.39 # 2 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification 0.15/0.39 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures. 0.15/0.39 # There are 1 start rule candidates: 0.15/0.39 # Found 2 unit axioms. 0.15/0.39 # 1 start rule tableaux created. 0.15/0.39 # 0 extension rule candidate clauses 0.15/0.39 # 2 unit axiom clauses 0.15/0.39 0.15/0.39 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. 0.15/0.39 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1 0.15/0.39 # Creating equality axioms 0.15/0.39 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses 0.15/0.39 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. 0.15/0.39 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. 0.15/0.39 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. 0.15/0.39 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. 0.15/0.39 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. 0.15/0.39 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. 0.15/0.39 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. 0.15/0.39 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. 0.15/0.39 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.15/0.39 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.15/0.39 # Begin clausification derivation 0.15/0.39 0.15/0.39 # End clausification derivation 0.15/0.39 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion 0.15/0.39 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (double_divide(inverse(double_divide(double_divide(X1,X2),inverse(double_divide(X1,inverse(X3))))),X2)=X3)). 0.15/0.39 cnf(i_0_6, negated_conjecture, (inverse(double_divide(a2,inverse(double_divide(b2,inverse(b2)))))!=a2)). 0.15/0.39 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (X4=X4)). 0.15/0.39 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! 0.15/0.39 # Begin printing tableau 0.15/0.39 # Found 5 steps 0.15/0.39 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (double_divide(inverse(double_divide(double_divide(X12,X11),inverse(double_divide(X12,inverse(double_divide(a2,inverse(double_divide(b2,inverse(b2))))))))),X11)=double_divide(a2,inverse(double_divide(b2,inverse(b2))))), inference(start_rule)). 0.15/0.39 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (double_divide(inverse(double_divide(double_divide(X12,X11),inverse(double_divide(X12,inverse(double_divide(a2,inverse(double_divide(b2,inverse(b2))))))))),X11)=double_divide(a2,inverse(double_divide(b2,inverse(b2))))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_13])). 0.15/0.39 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(double_divide(X12,X11),inverse(double_divide(X12,inverse(double_divide(a2,inverse(double_divide(b2,inverse(b2))))))))),X11))=inverse(double_divide(a2,inverse(double_divide(b2,inverse(b2)))))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_11])). 0.15/0.39 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (a2=inverse(double_divide(a2,inverse(double_divide(b2,inverse(b2)))))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_6])). 0.15/0.39 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (a2!=inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(double_divide(X12,X11),inverse(double_divide(X12,inverse(double_divide(a2,inverse(double_divide(b2,inverse(b2))))))))),X11))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_34, ...])). 0.15/0.39 # End printing tableau 0.15/0.39 # SZS output end 0.15/0.39 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" 0.15/0.39 # Returning from population with 7 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. 0.15/0.39 # We now have 7 tableaux to operate on 0.15/0.39 # Found closed tableau during pool population. 0.15/0.39 # Proof search is over... 0.15/0.39 # Freeing feature tree 0.15/0.39 EOF