0.03/0.12 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.03/0.12 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 1200 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 120 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jul 13 13:40:25 EDT 2021 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : 0.18/0.35 # No SInE strategy applied 0.18/0.35 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic U_____102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN 0.18/0.35 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn. 0.18/0.35 # 0.18/0.35 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.18/0.35 # Number of axioms: 20 Number of unprocessed: 20 0.18/0.35 # Tableaux proof search. 0.18/0.35 # APR header successfully linked. 0.18/0.35 # Hello from C++ 0.18/0.36 # The folding up rule is enabled... 0.18/0.36 # Local unification is enabled... 0.18/0.36 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... 0.18/0.36 # 20 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification 0.18/0.36 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures. 0.18/0.36 # There are 1 start rule candidates: 0.18/0.36 # Found 20 unit axioms. 0.18/0.36 # 1 start rule tableaux created. 0.18/0.36 # 0 extension rule candidate clauses 0.18/0.36 # 20 unit axiom clauses 0.18/0.36 0.18/0.36 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. 0.18/0.36 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1 0.18/0.36 # Creating equality axioms 0.18/0.36 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses 0.18/0.36 # Returning from population with 28 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. 0.18/0.36 # We now have 28 tableaux to operate on 2.28/0.64 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. 2.28/0.64 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. 2.28/0.64 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. 2.28/0.64 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. 2.28/0.64 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. 2.28/0.64 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. 2.28/0.64 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. 2.28/0.64 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. 2.28/0.64 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2.28/0.64 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2.28/0.64 # Begin clausification derivation 2.28/0.64 2.28/0.64 # End clausification derivation 2.28/0.64 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (multiply(identity,X1)=X1)). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (least_upper_bound(X1,X1)=X1)). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (greatest_lower_bound(X1,X1)=X1)). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (multiply(inverse(X1),X1)=identity)). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (least_upper_bound(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2))=X1)). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (greatest_lower_bound(X1,least_upper_bound(X1,X2))=X1)). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_38, hypothesis, (least_upper_bound(c,b)=least_upper_bound(c,a))). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_40, hypothesis, (greatest_lower_bound(c,b)=greatest_lower_bound(c,a))). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (greatest_lower_bound(greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2),X3)=greatest_lower_bound(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X2,X3)))). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3)=multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)))). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (least_upper_bound(least_upper_bound(X1,X2),X3)=least_upper_bound(X1,least_upper_bound(X2,X3)))). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_36, hypothesis, (greatest_lower_bound(inverse(X1),inverse(X2))=inverse(least_upper_bound(X1,X2)))). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_37, hypothesis, (least_upper_bound(inverse(X1),inverse(X2))=inverse(greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2)))). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_30, plain, (greatest_lower_bound(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X3,X2))=multiply(greatest_lower_bound(X1,X3),X2))). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (least_upper_bound(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X1,X3))=multiply(X1,least_upper_bound(X2,X3)))). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (greatest_lower_bound(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X1,X3))=multiply(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X2,X3)))). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (least_upper_bound(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X3,X2))=multiply(least_upper_bound(X1,X3),X2))). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (least_upper_bound(X1,X2)=least_upper_bound(X2,X1))). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2)=greatest_lower_bound(X2,X1))). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_39, negated_conjecture, (b!=a)). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_42, plain, (X4=X4)). 2.28/0.64 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! 2.28/0.64 # Begin printing tableau 2.28/0.64 # Found 6 steps 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (multiply(identity,X3)=X3), inference(start_rule)). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_50, plain, (multiply(identity,X3)=X3), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_48])). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_85, plain, (multiply(identity,X5)!=X5), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_22])). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_83, plain, (least_upper_bound(multiply(identity,X3),multiply(identity,X5))=least_upper_bound(X3,X5)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_45])). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_95, plain, (least_upper_bound(X3,X5)!=multiply(identity,least_upper_bound(X3,X5))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_22])). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_93, plain, (least_upper_bound(multiply(identity,X3),multiply(identity,X5))=multiply(identity,least_upper_bound(X3,X5))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_93, ...])). 2.28/0.64 # End printing tableau 2.28/0.64 # SZS output end 2.28/0.64 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" 2.28/0.64 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. 2.28/0.64 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. 2.28/0.64 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. 2.28/0.64 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. 2.28/0.64 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. 2.28/0.64 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. 2.28/0.64 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. 2.28/0.64 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. 2.28/0.64 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2.28/0.64 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2.28/0.64 # Begin clausification derivation 2.28/0.64 2.28/0.64 # End clausification derivation 2.28/0.64 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (multiply(identity,X1)=X1)). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (least_upper_bound(X1,X1)=X1)). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (greatest_lower_bound(X1,X1)=X1)). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (multiply(inverse(X1),X1)=identity)). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (least_upper_bound(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2))=X1)). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (greatest_lower_bound(X1,least_upper_bound(X1,X2))=X1)). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_38, hypothesis, (least_upper_bound(c,b)=least_upper_bound(c,a))). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_40, hypothesis, (greatest_lower_bound(c,b)=greatest_lower_bound(c,a))). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (greatest_lower_bound(greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2),X3)=greatest_lower_bound(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X2,X3)))). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3)=multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)))). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (least_upper_bound(least_upper_bound(X1,X2),X3)=least_upper_bound(X1,least_upper_bound(X2,X3)))). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_36, hypothesis, (greatest_lower_bound(inverse(X1),inverse(X2))=inverse(least_upper_bound(X1,X2)))). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_37, hypothesis, (least_upper_bound(inverse(X1),inverse(X2))=inverse(greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2)))). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_30, plain, (greatest_lower_bound(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X3,X2))=multiply(greatest_lower_bound(X1,X3),X2))). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (least_upper_bound(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X1,X3))=multiply(X1,least_upper_bound(X2,X3)))). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (greatest_lower_bound(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X1,X3))=multiply(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X2,X3)))). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (least_upper_bound(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X3,X2))=multiply(least_upper_bound(X1,X3),X2))). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (least_upper_bound(X1,X2)=least_upper_bound(X2,X1))). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2)=greatest_lower_bound(X2,X1))). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_39, negated_conjecture, (b!=a)). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_42, plain, (X4=X4)). 2.28/0.64 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! 2.28/0.64 # Begin printing tableau 2.28/0.64 # Found 6 steps 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (multiply(identity,a)=a), inference(start_rule)). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_50, plain, (multiply(identity,a)=a), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_45])). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_75, plain, (b=a), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_39])). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_76, plain, (b!=multiply(identity,a)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_45])). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_94, plain, (b!=multiply(identity,b)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_22])). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_95, plain, (multiply(identity,b)!=multiply(identity,a)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_95, ...])). 2.28/0.64 # End printing tableau 2.28/0.64 # SZS output end 2.28/0.64 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" 2.28/0.64 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. 2.28/0.64 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. 2.28/0.64 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. 2.28/0.64 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. 2.28/0.64 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. 2.28/0.64 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. 2.28/0.64 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. 2.28/0.64 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. 2.28/0.64 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2.28/0.64 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2.28/0.64 # Begin clausification derivation 2.28/0.64 2.28/0.64 # End clausification derivation 2.28/0.64 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (multiply(identity,X1)=X1)). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (least_upper_bound(X1,X1)=X1)). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (greatest_lower_bound(X1,X1)=X1)). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (multiply(inverse(X1),X1)=identity)). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (least_upper_bound(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2))=X1)). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (greatest_lower_bound(X1,least_upper_bound(X1,X2))=X1)). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_38, hypothesis, (least_upper_bound(c,b)=least_upper_bound(c,a))). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_40, hypothesis, (greatest_lower_bound(c,b)=greatest_lower_bound(c,a))). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (greatest_lower_bound(greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2),X3)=greatest_lower_bound(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X2,X3)))). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3)=multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)))). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (least_upper_bound(least_upper_bound(X1,X2),X3)=least_upper_bound(X1,least_upper_bound(X2,X3)))). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_36, hypothesis, (greatest_lower_bound(inverse(X1),inverse(X2))=inverse(least_upper_bound(X1,X2)))). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_37, hypothesis, (least_upper_bound(inverse(X1),inverse(X2))=inverse(greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2)))). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_30, plain, (greatest_lower_bound(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X3,X2))=multiply(greatest_lower_bound(X1,X3),X2))). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (least_upper_bound(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X1,X3))=multiply(X1,least_upper_bound(X2,X3)))). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (greatest_lower_bound(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X1,X3))=multiply(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X2,X3)))). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (least_upper_bound(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X3,X2))=multiply(least_upper_bound(X1,X3),X2))). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (least_upper_bound(X1,X2)=least_upper_bound(X2,X1))). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2)=greatest_lower_bound(X2,X1))). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_39, negated_conjecture, (b!=a)). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_42, plain, (X4=X4)). 2.28/0.64 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! 2.28/0.64 # Begin printing tableau 2.28/0.64 # Found 6 steps 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (multiply(identity,identity)=identity), inference(start_rule)). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_50, plain, (multiply(identity,identity)=identity), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_46])). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_80, plain, (multiply(identity,X7)!=X7), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_22])). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_78, plain, (multiply(multiply(identity,identity),multiply(identity,X7))=multiply(identity,X7)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_45])). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_95, plain, (multiply(identity,X7)!=X7), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_22])). 2.28/0.64 cnf(i_0_93, plain, (multiply(multiply(identity,identity),multiply(identity,X7))=X7), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_93, ...])). 2.28/0.64 # End printing tableau 2.28/0.64 # SZS output end 2.28/0.64 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" 2.28/0.64 # Child (19623) has found a proof. 2.28/0.64 2.28/0.64 # Proof search is over... 2.28/0.64 # Freeing feature tree 2.28/0.65 EOF