0.07/0.12 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.07/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 1200 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 120 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jul 15 06:20:41 EDT 2021 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : 0.13/0.37 # No SInE strategy applied 0.13/0.37 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04AN 0.13/0.37 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn. 0.13/0.37 # 0.13/0.37 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.13/0.37 # Number of axioms: 3 Number of unprocessed: 3 0.13/0.37 # Tableaux proof search. 0.13/0.37 # APR header successfully linked. 0.13/0.37 # Hello from C++ 0.13/0.37 # The folding up rule is enabled... 0.13/0.37 # Local unification is enabled... 0.13/0.37 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... 0.13/0.37 # 3 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification 0.13/0.37 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures. 0.13/0.37 # There are 1 start rule candidates: 0.13/0.37 # Found 3 unit axioms. 0.13/0.37 # 1 start rule tableaux created. 0.13/0.37 # 0 extension rule candidate clauses 0.13/0.37 # 3 unit axiom clauses 0.13/0.37 0.13/0.37 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. 0.13/0.37 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1 0.13/0.37 # Creating equality axioms 0.13/0.37 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses 0.13/0.37 # Returning from population with 8 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. 0.13/0.37 # We now have 8 tableaux to operate on 0.13/0.38 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. 0.13/0.38 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. 0.13/0.38 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. 0.13/0.38 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. 0.13/0.38 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. 0.13/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. 0.13/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. 0.13/0.38 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. 0.13/0.38 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.13/0.38 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.13/0.38 # Begin clausification derivation 0.13/0.38 0.13/0.38 # End clausification derivation 0.13/0.38 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (apply(X1,apply(X2,X2))=apply(apply(l,X1),X2))). 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (apply(apply(apply(s,X1),X2),X3)=apply(apply(X1,X3),apply(X2,X3)))). 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_4, negated_conjecture, (apply(f(X1),apply(X1,f(X1)))!=apply(X1,f(X1)))). 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (X4=X4)). 0.13/0.38 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! 0.13/0.38 # Begin printing tableau 0.13/0.38 # Found 6 steps 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (apply(X12,apply(X11,X11))=apply(apply(l,X12),X11)), inference(start_rule)). 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (apply(X12,apply(X11,X11))=apply(apply(l,X12),X11)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_13])). 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (apply(apply(apply(l,X12),X11),apply(apply(l,apply(apply(l,X12),X11)),apply(l,apply(apply(l,X12),X11))))!=apply(apply(l,apply(apply(l,X12),X11)),apply(l,apply(apply(l,X12),X11)))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_5])). 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (apply(apply(X12,apply(X11,X11)),apply(apply(apply(l,X12),X11),apply(apply(l,apply(apply(l,X12),X11)),apply(l,apply(apply(l,X12),X11)))))=apply(apply(apply(l,X12),X11),apply(apply(l,apply(apply(l,X12),X11)),apply(l,apply(apply(l,X12),X11))))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_11])). 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_36, plain, (apply(apply(apply(l,X12),X11),apply(apply(l,apply(apply(l,X12),X11)),apply(l,apply(apply(l,X12),X11))))!=apply(apply(l,apply(apply(l,X12),X11)),apply(l,apply(apply(l,X12),X11)))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_5])). 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (apply(apply(X12,apply(X11,X11)),apply(apply(apply(l,X12),X11),apply(apply(l,apply(apply(l,X12),X11)),apply(l,apply(apply(l,X12),X11)))))=apply(apply(l,apply(apply(l,X12),X11)),apply(l,apply(apply(l,X12),X11)))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_34, ...])). 0.13/0.38 # End printing tableau 0.13/0.38 # SZS output end 0.13/0.38 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" 0.13/0.38 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. 0.13/0.38 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. 0.13/0.38 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. 0.13/0.38 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. 0.13/0.38 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. 0.13/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. 0.13/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. 0.13/0.38 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. 0.13/0.38 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.13/0.38 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.13/0.38 # Begin clausification derivation 0.13/0.38 0.13/0.38 # End clausification derivation 0.13/0.38 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (apply(X1,apply(X2,X2))=apply(apply(l,X1),X2))). 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (apply(apply(apply(s,X1),X2),X3)=apply(apply(X1,X3),apply(X2,X3)))). 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_4, negated_conjecture, (apply(f(X1),apply(X1,f(X1)))!=apply(X1,f(X1)))). 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (X4=X4)). 0.13/0.38 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! 0.13/0.38 # Begin printing tableau 0.13/0.38 # Found 5 steps 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (apply(apply(apply(s,X1),X2),X3)=apply(apply(X1,X3),apply(X2,X3))), inference(start_rule)). 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (apply(apply(apply(s,X1),X2),X3)=apply(apply(X1,X3),apply(X2,X3))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_11])). 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_36, plain, (apply(apply(X1,X3),apply(X2,X3))!=apply(apply(apply(s,X1),X2),X3)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_6])). 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (apply(apply(apply(s,X1),X2),X3)=apply(apply(apply(s,X1),X2),X3)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_12])). 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_41, plain, (f(apply(apply(apply(s,X1),X2),X3))=f(apply(apply(apply(s,X1),X2),X3))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_41, ...])). 0.13/0.38 # End printing tableau 0.13/0.38 # SZS output end 0.13/0.38 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" 0.13/0.38 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. 0.13/0.38 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. 0.13/0.38 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. 0.13/0.38 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. 0.13/0.38 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. 0.13/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. 0.13/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. 0.13/0.38 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. 0.13/0.38 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.13/0.38 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.13/0.38 # Begin clausification derivation 0.13/0.38 0.13/0.38 # End clausification derivation 0.13/0.38 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (apply(X1,apply(X2,X2))=apply(apply(l,X1),X2))). 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (apply(apply(apply(s,X1),X2),X3)=apply(apply(X1,X3),apply(X2,X3)))). 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_4, negated_conjecture, (apply(f(X1),apply(X1,f(X1)))!=apply(X1,f(X1)))). 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (X4=X4)). 0.13/0.38 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! 0.13/0.38 # Begin printing tableau 0.13/0.38 # Found 5 steps 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (apply(X7,apply(apply(X6,X6),apply(X6,X6)))=apply(apply(l,X7),apply(X6,X6))), inference(start_rule)). 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (apply(X7,apply(apply(X6,X6),apply(X6,X6)))=apply(apply(l,X7),apply(X6,X6))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_11])). 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (apply(apply(l,X7),apply(X6,X6))!=apply(apply(l,apply(l,X7)),X6)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_5])). 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (apply(X7,apply(apply(X6,X6),apply(X6,X6)))=apply(apply(l,apply(l,X7)),X6)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_12])). 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_77, plain, (f(apply(X7,apply(apply(X6,X6),apply(X6,X6))))=f(apply(apply(l,apply(l,X7)),X6))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_77, ...])). 0.13/0.38 # End printing tableau 0.13/0.38 # SZS output end 0.13/0.38 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" 0.13/0.38 # Child (24733) has found a proof. 0.13/0.38 0.13/0.38 # Proof search is over... 0.13/0.38 # Freeing feature tree 0.23/0.38 EOF