0.04/0.09 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.04/0.09 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s 0.09/0.30 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu 0.09/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.09/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.09/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.09/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.09/0.30 % CPULimit : 1200 0.09/0.30 % DateTime : Tue Jul 13 11:54:49 EDT 2021 0.09/0.30 % CPUTime : 0.72/1.00 ============================== Prover9 =============================== 0.72/1.00 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009. 0.72/1.00 Process 28468 was started by sandbox on n014.cluster.edu, 0.72/1.00 Tue Jul 13 11:54:50 2021 0.72/1.00 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 1200 -f /tmp/Prover9_28314_n014.cluster.edu". 0.72/1.00 ============================== end of head =========================== 0.72/1.00 0.72/1.00 ============================== INPUT ================================= 0.72/1.00 0.72/1.00 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_28314_n014.cluster.edu 0.72/1.00 0.72/1.00 set(prolog_style_variables). 0.72/1.00 set(auto2). 0.72/1.00 % set(auto2) -> set(auto). 0.72/1.00 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference). 0.72/1.00 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup). 0.72/1.00 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim). 0.72/1.00 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold). 0.72/1.00 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits). 0.72/1.00 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000"). 0.72/1.00 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000). 0.72/1.00 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials). 0.72/1.00 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process). 0.72/1.00 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1). 0.72/1.00 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3). 0.72/1.00 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000"). 0.72/1.00 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1). 0.72/1.00 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600). 0.72/1.00 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0). 0.72/1.00 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5). 0.72/1.00 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300). 0.72/1.00 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos). 0.72/1.00 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1). 0.72/1.00 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000). 0.72/1.00 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400). 0.72/1.00 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some). 0.72/1.00 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input). 0.72/1.00 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet). 0.72/1.00 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses). 0.72/1.00 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given). 0.72/1.00 assign(lrs_ticks,-1). 0.72/1.00 assign(sos_limit,10000). 0.72/1.00 assign(order,kbo). 0.72/1.00 set(lex_order_vars). 0.72/1.00 clear(print_given). 0.72/1.00 0.72/1.00 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (33 formulas) 0.72/1.00 0.72/1.00 ============================== end of input ========================== 0.72/1.00 0.72/1.00 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 1200). 0.72/1.00 0.72/1.00 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ========== 0.72/1.00 0.72/1.00 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses: 0.72/1.00 1 (all Ax all C (status(Ax,C,unp) <-> (-(exists I1 model(I1,Ax)) -> -(exists I2 model(I2,C))))) # label(unp) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.72/1.00 2 (all Ax all C ((all I2 (model(I2,Ax) -> model(I2,C))) & (exists I3 (-model(I3,Ax) & model(I3,C))) & (exists I1 model(I1,Ax)) <-> status(Ax,C,wec))) # label(wec) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.72/1.00 3 (all Ax all C ((all I2 model(I2,C)) & -(exists I1 model(I1,Ax)) <-> status(Ax,C,tca))) # label(tca) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.72/1.00 4 (all Ax all C (status(Ax,C,eqv) <-> (exists I1 model(I1,Ax)) & (all I2 (model(I2,Ax) <-> model(I2,C))))) # label(eqv) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.72/1.00 5 (all Ax all C (status(Ax,C,eth) <-> (exists I1 model(I1,Ax)) & (all I3 (model(I3,Ax) <-> model(I3,C))) & (exists I2 -model(I2,Ax)))) # label(eth) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.72/1.00 6 (all Ax all C (status(Ax,C,tau) <-> (all I1 (model(I1,C) & model(I1,Ax))))) # label(tau) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.72/1.00 7 (all Ax all C (status(Ax,C,wca) <-> (exists I2 model(I2,C)) & (exists I3 -model(I3,C)) & -(exists I1 model(I1,Ax)))) # label(wca) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.72/1.00 8 (all Ax all C (status(Ax,C,noc) <-> (exists I1 (model(I1,C) & model(I1,Ax))) & (exists I2 (model(I2,Ax) & model(I2,not(C)))))) # label(noc) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.72/1.00 9 (all Ax all C (status(Ax,C,tac) <-> (all I2 model(I2,C)) & (exists I1 model(I1,Ax)))) # label(tac) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.72/1.00 10 (all Ax all C ((exists I2 -model(I2,Ax)) & (all I3 model(I3,C)) & (exists I1 model(I1,Ax)) <-> status(Ax,C,wtc))) # label(wtc) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.72/1.00 11 (all Ax all C (status(Ax,C,cax) <-> -(exists I1 model(I1,Ax)))) # label(cax) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.72/1.00 12 (all Ax all C ((all I1 model(I1,Ax)) & (all I2 model(I2,not(C))) <-> status(Ax,C,uns))) # label(uns) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.72/1.00 13 (all Ax all C (status(Ax,C,sca) <-> (exists I2 model(I2,C)) & -(exists I1 model(I1,Ax)))) # label(sca) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.72/1.00 14 (all Ax all C (((exists I1 model(I1,Ax)) -> (exists I2 model(I2,C))) <-> status(Ax,C,sap))) # label(sap) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.72/1.00 15 (all Ax all C (((exists I1 model(I1,Ax)) <-> (exists I2 model(I2,C))) <-> status(Ax,C,esa))) # label(esa) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.72/1.00 16 (all Ax all C ((exists I1 (model(I1,Ax) & model(I1,not(C)))) <-> status(Ax,C,csa))) # label(csa) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.72/1.00 17 (all Ax all C (status(Ax,C,sat) <-> (exists I1 (model(I1,Ax) & model(I1,C))))) # label(sat) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.72/1.00 18 (all Ax all C ((all I2 (model(I2,Ax) -> model(I2,C))) & (exists I4 -model(I4,C)) & (exists I3 (model(I3,C) & -model(I3,Ax))) & (exists I1 model(I1,Ax)) <-> status(Ax,C,wth))) # label(wth) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.72/1.00 19 (all Ax all C ((all I1 (model(I1,Ax) -> model(I1,C))) <-> status(Ax,C,thm))) # label(thm) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.72/1.00 20 (exists F all I -model(I,F)) # label(contradiction) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.72/1.00 21 (exists F all I model(I,F)) # label(tautology) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.72/1.00 22 (all S1 all S2 ((exists Ax exists C (-status(Ax,C,S2) & status(Ax,C,S1))) <-> nota(S1,S2))) # label(nota) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.72/1.00 23 (all I all F -(model(I,not(F)) <-> model(I,F))) # label(completeness) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.72/1.00 24 (exists Ax exists C ((exists I1 (model(I1,Ax) & model(I1,C))) & (exists I2 (-model(I2,Ax) | -model(I2,C))))) # label(sat_non_taut_pair) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.72/1.00 25 (all I all F (-model(I,not(F)) <-> model(I,F))) # label(not) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.72/1.00 26 (exists Ax exists C ((exists I4 -model(I4,C)) & (exists I3 (-model(I3,Ax) & model(I3,C))) & (all I2 (model(I2,Ax) -> model(I2,C))) & (exists I1 model(I1,Ax)))) # label(mixed_pair) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.72/1.00 27 (all S1 all S2 ((exists Ax exists C (status(Ax,C,S1) & status(Ax,C,S2))) <-> mighta(S1,S2))) # label(mighta) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.72/1.00 28 (all S1 all S2 ((all Ax all C (status(Ax,C,S1) -> status(Ax,C,S2))) <-> isa(S1,S2))) # label(isa) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.72/1.00 29 (all S1 all S2 ((all Ax all C (status(Ax,C,S1) -> -status(Ax,C,S2))) <-> nevera(S1,S2))) # label(nevera) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.72/1.00 30 (exists F ((exists I1 model(I1,F)) & (exists I2 -model(I2,F)))) # label(satisfiable) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.72/1.00 31 (all S1 all S2 ((all Ax all C -(status(Ax,C,S2) <-> status(Ax,C,S1))) <-> xora(S1,S2))) # label(xora) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.72/1.00 32 (exists I1 exists Ax exists C ((exists I2 model(I2,C)) & -model(I1,C) & model(I1,Ax))) # label(non_thm_spt) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.72/1.00 0.72/1.00 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas === 0.72/1.00 0.72/1.00 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES =============== 0.72/1.00 0.72/1.00 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION ================= 0.72/1.00 33 -status(f42(A,B),f43(A,B),B) | -nota(A,B) # label(nota) # label(axiom). [clausify(22)]. 0.72/1.00 34 status(A,B,C) | -status(A,B,D) | nota(D,C) # label(nota) # label(axiom). [clausify(22)]. 0.72/1.00 Derived: -status(f42(A,B),f43(A,B),B) | status(C,D,B) | -status(C,D,A). [resolve(33,b,34,c)]. 0.72/1.00 35 status(f42(A,B),f43(A,B),A) | -nota(A,B) # label(nota) # label(axiom). [clausify(22)]. 0.72/1.00 Derived: status(f42(A,B),f43(A,B),A) | status(C,D,B) | -status(C,D,A). [resolve(35,b,34,c)]. 0.72/1.00 36 status(f44(A,B),f45(A,B),A) | -mighta(A,B) # label(mighta) # label(axiom). [clausify(27)]. 0.72/1.00 37 -status(A,B,C) | -status(A,B,D) | mighta(C,D) # label(mighta) # label(axiom). [clausify(27)]. 0.72/1.00 Derived: status(f44(A,B),f45(A,B),A) | -status(C,D,A) | -status(C,D,B). [resolve(36,b,37,c)]. 0.72/1.25 38 status(f44(A,B),f45(A,B),B) | -mighta(A,B) # label(mighta) # label(axiom). [clausify(27)]. 0.72/1.25 Derived: status(f44(A,B),f45(A,B),B) | -status(C,D,A) | -status(C,D,B). [resolve(38,b,37,c)]. 0.72/1.25 39 -mighta(sca,thm) # label(mighta_sca_thm) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption]. 0.72/1.25 Derived: -status(A,B,sca) | -status(A,B,thm). [resolve(39,a,37,c)]. 0.72/1.25 40 -status(A,B,C) | status(A,B,D) | -isa(C,D) # label(isa) # label(axiom). [clausify(28)]. 0.72/1.25 41 status(f46(A,B),f47(A,B),A) | isa(A,B) # label(isa) # label(axiom). [clausify(28)]. 0.72/1.25 42 -status(f46(A,B),f47(A,B),B) | isa(A,B) # label(isa) # label(axiom). [clausify(28)]. 0.72/1.25 Derived: -status(A,B,C) | status(A,B,D) | status(f46(C,D),f47(C,D),C). [resolve(40,c,41,b)]. 0.72/1.25 Derived: -status(A,B,C) | status(A,B,D) | -status(f46(C,D),f47(C,D),D). [resolve(40,c,42,b)]. 0.72/1.25 43 -status(A,B,C) | -status(A,B,D) | -nevera(C,D) # label(nevera) # label(axiom). [clausify(29)]. 0.72/1.25 44 status(f48(A,B),f49(A,B),A) | nevera(A,B) # label(nevera) # label(axiom). [clausify(29)]. 0.72/1.25 45 status(f48(A,B),f49(A,B),B) | nevera(A,B) # label(nevera) # label(axiom). [clausify(29)]. 0.72/1.25 Derived: -status(A,B,C) | -status(A,B,D) | status(f48(C,D),f49(C,D),C). [resolve(43,c,44,b)]. 0.72/1.25 Derived: -status(A,B,C) | -status(A,B,D) | status(f48(C,D),f49(C,D),D). [resolve(43,c,45,b)]. 0.72/1.25 46 status(A,B,C) | status(A,B,D) | -xora(D,C) # label(xora) # label(axiom). [clausify(31)]. 0.72/1.25 47 -status(f50(A,B),f51(A,B),B) | status(f50(A,B),f51(A,B),A) | xora(A,B) # label(xora) # label(axiom). [clausify(31)]. 0.72/1.25 48 status(f50(A,B),f51(A,B),B) | -status(f50(A,B),f51(A,B),A) | xora(A,B) # label(xora) # label(axiom). [clausify(31)]. 0.72/1.25 Derived: status(A,B,C) | status(A,B,D) | -status(f50(D,C),f51(D,C),C) | status(f50(D,C),f51(D,C),D). [resolve(46,c,47,c)]. 0.72/1.25 Derived: status(A,B,C) | status(A,B,D) | status(f50(D,C),f51(D,C),C) | -status(f50(D,C),f51(D,C),D). [resolve(46,c,48,c)]. 0.72/1.25 49 -status(A,B,C) | -status(A,B,D) | -xora(D,C) # label(xora) # label(axiom). [clausify(31)]. 0.72/1.25 Derived: -status(A,B,C) | -status(A,B,D) | -status(f50(D,C),f51(D,C),C) | status(f50(D,C),f51(D,C),D). [resolve(49,c,47,c)]. 0.72/1.25 Derived: -status(A,B,C) | -status(A,B,D) | status(f50(D,C),f51(D,C),C) | -status(f50(D,C),f51(D,C),D). [resolve(49,c,48,c)]. 0.72/1.25 0.72/1.25 ============================== end predicate elimination ============= 0.72/1.25 0.72/1.25 Auto_denials: (non-Horn, no changes). 0.72/1.25 0.72/1.25 Term ordering decisions: 0.72/1.25 0.72/1.25 % Assigning unary symbol not kb_weight 0 and highest precedence (91). 0.72/1.25 Function symbol KB weights: eqv=1. eth=1. noc=1. wec=1. wth=1. esa=1. csa=1. sap=1. sat=1. tac=1. tau=1. thm=1. unp=1. uns=1. wtc=1. sca=1. tca=1. wca=1. cax=1. c1=1. c2=1. c3=1. c4=1. c5=1. c6=1. c7=1. c8=1. c9=1. c10=1. c11=1. c12=1. c13=1. c14=1. c15=1. c16=1. c17=1. c18=1. f1=1. f2=1. f3=1. f4=1. f5=1. f6=1. f7=1. f8=1. f9=1. f10=1. f11=1. f12=1. f13=1. f14=1. f15=1. f16=1. f17=1. f18=1. f19=1. f20=1. f21=1. f22=1. f23=1. f24=1. f25=1. f26=1. f27=1. f28=1. f29=1. f30=1. f31=1. f32=1. f33=1. f34=1. f35=1. f36=1. f37=1. f38=1. f39=1. f40=1. f41=1. f42=1. f43=1. f44=1. f45=1. f46=1. f47=1. f48=1. f49=1. f50=1. f51=1. not=0. 0.72/1.25 0.72/1.25 ============================== end of process initial clauses ======== 0.72/1.25 0.72/1.25 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ==================== 0.72/1.25 0.72/1.25 ============================== end of clauses for search ============= 0.72/1.25 0.72/1.25 ============================== SEARCH ================================ 0.72/1.25 0.72/1.25 % Starting search at 0.03 seconds. 0.72/1.25 0.72/1.25 ============================== PROOF ================================= 0.72/1.25 % SZS status Theorem 0.72/1.25 % SZS output start Refutation 0.72/1.25 0.72/1.25 % Proof 1 at 0.25 (+ 0.00) seconds. 0.72/1.25 % Length of proof is 16. 0.72/1.25 % Level of proof is 4. 0.72/1.25 % Maximum clause weight is 12.000. 0.72/1.25 % Given clauses 174. 0.72/1.25 0.72/1.25 13 (all Ax all C (status(Ax,C,sca) <-> (exists I2 model(I2,C)) & -(exists I1 model(I1,Ax)))) # label(sca) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.72/1.25 19 (all Ax all C ((all I1 (model(I1,Ax) -> model(I1,C))) <-> status(Ax,C,thm))) # label(thm) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.72/1.25 20 (exists F all I -model(I,F)) # label(contradiction) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.72/1.25 21 (exists F all I model(I,F)) # label(tautology) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.72/1.25 27 (all S1 all S2 ((exists Ax exists C (status(Ax,C,S1) & status(Ax,C,S2))) <-> mighta(S1,S2))) # label(mighta) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.72/1.25 37 -status(A,B,C) | -status(A,B,D) | mighta(C,D) # label(mighta) # label(axiom). [clausify(27)]. 0.72/1.25 39 -mighta(sca,thm) # label(mighta_sca_thm) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption]. 0.72/1.25 99 status(A,B,sca) | -model(C,B) | model(f28(A,B),A) # label(sca) # label(axiom). [clausify(13)]. 0.72/1.25 121 -model(f41(A,B),B) | status(A,B,thm) # label(thm) # label(axiom). [clausify(19)]. 0.72/1.25 123 -model(A,c1) # label(contradiction) # label(axiom). [clausify(20)]. 0.72/1.25 124 model(A,c2) # label(tautology) # label(axiom). [clausify(21)]. 0.72/1.25 144 -status(A,B,sca) | -status(A,B,thm). [resolve(39,a,37,c)]. 0.72/1.25 178 status(A,c2,thm). [resolve(124,a,121,a)]. 0.72/1.25 185 status(A,c2,sca) | model(f28(A,c2),A). [resolve(124,a,99,b)]. 0.72/1.25 1500 model(f28(A,c2),A). [resolve(185,a,144,a),unit_del(b,178)]. 0.72/1.25 1501 $F. [resolve(1500,a,123,a)]. 0.72/1.25 0.72/1.25 % SZS output end Refutation 0.72/1.25 ============================== end of proof ========================== 0.72/1.25 0.72/1.25 ============================== STATISTICS ============================ 0.72/1.25 0.72/1.25 Given=174. Generated=1909. Kept=1451. proofs=1. 0.72/1.25 Usable=174. Sos=1243. Demods=0. Limbo=12, Disabled=143. Hints=0. 0.72/1.25 Megabytes=2.47. 0.72/1.25 User_CPU=0.25, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0. 0.72/1.25 0.72/1.25 ============================== end of statistics ===================== 0.72/1.25 0.72/1.25 ============================== end of search ========================= 0.72/1.25 0.72/1.25 THEOREM PROVED 0.72/1.25 % SZS status Theorem 0.72/1.25 0.72/1.25 Exiting with 1 proof. 0.72/1.25 0.72/1.25 Process 28468 exit (max_proofs) Tue Jul 13 11:54:50 2021 0.72/1.25 Prover9 interrupted 0.72/1.25 EOF