0.07/0.12 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.07/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 1200 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 120 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jul 13 10:47:25 EDT 2021 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : 0.19/0.37 # No SInE strategy applied 0.19/0.37 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN 0.19/0.37 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn. 0.19/0.37 # 0.19/0.37 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.19/0.37 # Number of axioms: 6 Number of unprocessed: 6 0.19/0.37 # Tableaux proof search. 0.19/0.37 # APR header successfully linked. 0.19/0.37 # Hello from C++ 0.19/0.37 # The folding up rule is enabled... 0.19/0.37 # Local unification is enabled... 0.19/0.37 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... 0.19/0.37 # 6 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification 0.19/0.37 # Creating start rules for all 6 conjectures. 0.19/0.37 # There are 6 start rule candidates: 0.19/0.37 # Found 4 unit axioms. 0.19/0.37 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on. 0.19/0.37 # 6 start rule tableaux created. 0.19/0.37 # 2 extension rule candidate clauses 0.19/0.37 # 4 unit axiom clauses 0.19/0.37 0.19/0.37 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. 0.19/0.37 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 6 0.19/0.37 # Returning from population with 8 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. 0.19/0.37 # We now have 8 tableaux to operate on 0.19/0.37 # Closed tableau found in foldup close cycle with 0 folds and 3 closures done. 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 total branch saturation attempts. 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 total successful branch saturations. 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch. 0.19/0.37 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.19/0.37 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.19/0.37 # Begin clausification derivation 0.19/0.37 0.19/0.37 # End clausification derivation 0.19/0.37 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_4, negated_conjecture, (big_f(X1,esk4_1(X1)))). 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_3, negated_conjecture, (big_s(X1,esk6_2(X2,X1)))). 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_2, negated_conjecture, (big_f(esk6_2(X1,X2),esk7_2(X1,X2)))). 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_1, negated_conjecture, (~big_d(esk7_2(X1,X2),X1,esk5_1(X1)))). 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_6, negated_conjecture, (big_d(X1,esk1_0,X2)|~big_s(esk2_1(X2),X1))). 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_5, negated_conjecture, (big_d(X1,X2,X3)|~big_d(X4,X5,esk3_1(X3))|~big_f(X5,X2)|~big_f(X4,X1))). 0.19/0.37 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! 0.19/0.37 # Begin printing tableau 0.19/0.37 # Found 6 steps 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_3, negated_conjecture, (big_s(esk2_1(esk3_1(esk5_1(esk4_1(esk1_0)))),esk6_2(esk4_1(esk1_0),esk2_1(esk3_1(esk5_1(esk4_1(esk1_0))))))), inference(start_rule)). 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (big_s(esk2_1(esk3_1(esk5_1(esk4_1(esk1_0)))),esk6_2(esk4_1(esk1_0),esk2_1(esk3_1(esk5_1(esk4_1(esk1_0))))))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_6])). 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_45, plain, (big_d(esk6_2(esk4_1(esk1_0),esk2_1(esk3_1(esk5_1(esk4_1(esk1_0))))),esk1_0,esk3_1(esk5_1(esk4_1(esk1_0))))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_5])). 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_53, plain, (big_d(esk7_2(esk4_1(esk1_0),esk2_1(esk3_1(esk5_1(esk4_1(esk1_0))))),esk4_1(esk1_0),esk5_1(esk4_1(esk1_0)))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_1])). 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_55, plain, (~big_f(esk1_0,esk4_1(esk1_0))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_4])). 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_56, plain, (~big_f(esk6_2(esk4_1(esk1_0),esk2_1(esk3_1(esk5_1(esk4_1(esk1_0))))),esk7_2(esk4_1(esk1_0),esk2_1(esk3_1(esk5_1(esk4_1(esk1_0))))))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_2])). 0.19/0.37 # End printing tableau 0.19/0.37 # SZS output end 0.19/0.37 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" 0.19/0.37 # Closed tableau found in foldup close cycle with 0 folds and 1 closures done. 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 total branch saturation attempts. 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 total successful branch saturations. 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch. 0.19/0.37 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.19/0.37 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.19/0.37 # Begin clausification derivation 0.19/0.37 0.19/0.37 # End clausification derivation 0.19/0.37 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_4, negated_conjecture, (big_f(X1,esk4_1(X1)))). 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_3, negated_conjecture, (big_s(X1,esk6_2(X2,X1)))). 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_2, negated_conjecture, (big_f(esk6_2(X1,X2),esk7_2(X1,X2)))). 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_1, negated_conjecture, (~big_d(esk7_2(X1,X2),X1,esk5_1(X1)))). 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_6, negated_conjecture, (big_d(X1,esk1_0,X2)|~big_s(esk2_1(X2),X1))). 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_5, negated_conjecture, (big_d(X1,X2,X3)|~big_d(X4,X5,esk3_1(X3))|~big_f(X5,X2)|~big_f(X4,X1))). 0.19/0.37 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! 0.19/0.37 # Begin printing tableau 0.19/0.37 # Found 6 steps 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_4, negated_conjecture, (big_f(esk1_0,esk4_1(esk1_0))), inference(start_rule)). 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (big_f(esk1_0,esk4_1(esk1_0))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_5])). 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_47, plain, (big_d(esk7_2(esk4_1(esk1_0),esk2_1(esk3_1(esk5_1(esk4_1(esk1_0))))),esk4_1(esk1_0),esk5_1(esk4_1(esk1_0)))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_1])). 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_50, plain, (~big_f(esk6_2(esk4_1(esk1_0),esk2_1(esk3_1(esk5_1(esk4_1(esk1_0))))),esk7_2(esk4_1(esk1_0),esk2_1(esk3_1(esk5_1(esk4_1(esk1_0))))))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_2])). 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_48, plain, (~big_d(esk6_2(esk4_1(esk1_0),esk2_1(esk3_1(esk5_1(esk4_1(esk1_0))))),esk1_0,esk3_1(esk5_1(esk4_1(esk1_0))))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_6])). 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_88, plain, (~big_s(esk2_1(esk3_1(esk5_1(esk4_1(esk1_0)))),esk6_2(esk4_1(esk1_0),esk2_1(esk3_1(esk5_1(esk4_1(esk1_0))))))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_3])). 0.19/0.37 # End printing tableau 0.19/0.37 # SZS output end 0.19/0.37 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" 0.19/0.37 # Child (18801) has found a proof. 0.19/0.37 0.19/0.37 # Proof search is over... 0.19/0.37 # Freeing feature tree 0.19/0.37 EOF