0.12/0.12	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.12/0.12	% Command    : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
0.13/0.33	% Computer   : n012.cluster.edu
0.13/0.33	% Model      : x86_64 x86_64
0.13/0.33	% CPU        : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.13/0.33	% Memory     : 8042.1875MB
0.13/0.33	% OS         : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.13/0.33	% CPULimit   : 1200
0.13/0.33	% WCLimit    : 120
0.13/0.33	% DateTime   : Tue Jul 13 13:52:01 EDT 2021
0.13/0.33	% CPUTime    : 
0.19/0.37	# No SInE strategy applied
0.19/0.37	# Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___110_C45_F1_PI_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4S
0.19/0.37	# and selection function SelectNewComplexAHPNS.
0.19/0.37	#
0.19/0.37	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.19/0.37	# Number of axioms: 43 Number of unprocessed: 43
0.19/0.37	# Tableaux proof search.
0.19/0.37	# APR header successfully linked.
0.19/0.37	# Hello from C++
0.65/0.86	# The folding up rule is enabled...
0.65/0.86	# Local unification is enabled...
0.65/0.86	# Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
0.65/0.86	# 43 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
0.65/0.86	# Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
0.65/0.86	# There are 1 start rule candidates:
0.65/0.86	# Found 18 unit axioms.
0.65/0.86	# 1 start rule tableaux created.
0.65/0.86	# 25 extension rule candidate clauses
0.65/0.86	# 18 unit axiom clauses
0.65/0.86	
0.65/0.86	# Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
0.65/0.86	# There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
0.72/0.89	# There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
0.72/0.89	# There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
0.72/0.89	# There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
0.72/0.89	# There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
0.72/0.89	# There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
0.72/0.89	# There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
0.72/0.89	# There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
0.72/0.89	# There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
0.72/0.89	# SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.72/0.89	# SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.72/0.89	# Begin clausification derivation
0.72/0.89	
0.72/0.89	# End clausification derivation
0.72/0.89	# Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_10, plain, (id(X1,X1))).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_13, plain, (r1(esk6_1(X1)))).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_52, plain, (r1(esk15_1(X1)))).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_49, plain, (r1(esk16_1(X1)))).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_11, plain, (id(esk5_1(X1),X1))).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_8, plain, (r2(X1,esk3_2(X2,X1)))).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_57, plain, (r2(X1,esk19_2(X2,X1)))).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_5, plain, (r4(X1,X2,esk4_2(X1,X2)))).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_50, plain, (id(esk14_1(X1),esk16_1(X1)))).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_12, plain, (r3(X1,esk6_1(X1),esk5_1(X1)))).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_51, plain, (r4(X1,esk15_1(X1),esk14_1(X1)))).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_53, plain, (r3(X1,X2,esk20_2(X1,X2)))).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_7, plain, (id(esk2_2(X1,X2),esk1_2(X1,X2)))).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_55, plain, (id(esk18_2(X1,X2),esk17_2(X1,X2)))).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_54, plain, (r2(esk20_2(X1,X2),esk17_2(X1,X2)))).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_9, plain, (r4(X1,esk3_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2)))).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_56, plain, (r3(X1,esk19_2(X1,X2),esk18_2(X1,X2)))).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_6, plain, (r3(esk4_2(X1,X2),X1,esk1_2(X1,X2)))).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_31, plain, (~r1(X1)|~r2(X2,X3)|~id(X1,X3))).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_59, negated_conjecture, (~r1(X1)|~r1(X2)|~r1(X3)|~r2(X3,X4)|~r4(X2,X4,X5)|~id(X5,X1))).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_48, plain, (id(X1,esk13_0)|~r1(X1))).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_45, plain, (r1(X1)|~id(X1,esk13_0))).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_40, plain, (id(X1,X2)|~id(X2,X1))).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_17, plain, (id(X1,esk7_1(X2))|~r2(X2,X1))).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_14, plain, (r2(X1,X2)|~id(X2,esk7_1(X1)))).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_26, plain, (r1(esk11_1(X1))|id(X1,esk10_1(X1)))).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_20, plain, (r1(X1)|~r1(X2)|~id(X2,X1))).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_19, plain, (r1(X1)|~r1(X2)|~id(X1,X2))).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_27, plain, (id(X1,esk11_1(X1))|id(X1,esk10_1(X1)))).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_24, plain, (r4(X1,X2,X3)|~id(X3,esk8_2(X1,X2)))).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_23, plain, (id(X1,esk8_2(X2,X3))|~r4(X2,X3,X1))).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_28, plain, (r1(esk11_1(X1))|r2(esk9_1(X1),esk10_1(X1)))).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_36, plain, (r3(X1,X2,X3)|~id(X3,esk12_2(X1,X2)))).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_39, plain, (id(X1,esk12_2(X2,X3))|~r3(X2,X3,X1))).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_30, plain, (id(X1,X2)|~id(X1,X3)|~id(X3,X2))).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_29, plain, (r2(esk9_1(X1),esk10_1(X1))|id(X1,esk11_1(X1)))).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_58, plain, (id(X1,X2)|~r2(X2,X3)|~r2(X1,X4)|~id(X4,X3))).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_34, plain, (r2(X1,X2)|~r2(X3,X4)|~id(X2,X4)|~id(X1,X3))).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_33, plain, (r2(X1,X2)|~r2(X3,X4)|~id(X4,X2)|~id(X3,X1))).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_41, plain, (r4(X1,X2,X3)|~r4(X4,X5,X6)|~id(X6,X3)|~id(X5,X2)|~id(X4,X1))).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_44, plain, (r4(X1,X2,X3)|~r4(X4,X5,X6)|~id(X3,X6)|~id(X2,X5)|~id(X1,X4))).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_1, plain, (r3(X1,X2,X3)|~r3(X4,X5,X6)|~id(X3,X6)|~id(X2,X5)|~id(X1,X4))).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_4, plain, (r3(X1,X2,X3)|~r3(X4,X5,X6)|~id(X6,X3)|~id(X5,X2)|~id(X4,X1))).
0.72/0.89	# End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
0.72/0.89	# Begin printing tableau
0.72/0.89	# Found 11 steps
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_59, negated_conjecture, (~r1(esk6_1(X8))|~r1(esk6_1(X6))|~r1(esk6_1(X7))|~r2(esk6_1(X7),esk3_2(X9,esk6_1(X7)))|~r4(esk6_1(X6),esk3_2(X9,esk6_1(X7)),esk4_2(esk6_1(X6),esk3_2(X9,esk6_1(X7))))|~id(esk4_2(esk6_1(X6),esk3_2(X9,esk6_1(X7))),esk6_1(X8))), inference(start_rule)).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_60, plain, (~r1(esk6_1(X8))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_13])).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_61, plain, (~r1(esk6_1(X6))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_13])).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_62, plain, (~r1(esk6_1(X7))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_13])).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_63, plain, (~r2(esk6_1(X7),esk3_2(X9,esk6_1(X7)))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_8])).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_64, plain, (~r4(esk6_1(X6),esk3_2(X9,esk6_1(X7)),esk4_2(esk6_1(X6),esk3_2(X9,esk6_1(X7))))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_5])).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_65, plain, (~id(esk4_2(esk6_1(X6),esk3_2(X9,esk6_1(X7))),esk6_1(X8))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_58])).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_105, plain, (~r2(esk6_1(X8),esk3_2(X15,esk6_1(X8)))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_8])).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_106, plain, (~r2(esk4_2(esk6_1(X6),esk3_2(X9,esk6_1(X7))),esk3_2(X10,esk4_2(esk6_1(X6),esk3_2(X9,esk6_1(X7)))))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_8])).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_107, plain, (~id(esk3_2(X10,esk4_2(esk6_1(X6),esk3_2(X9,esk6_1(X7)))),esk3_2(X15,esk6_1(X8)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_40])).
0.72/0.89	cnf(i_0_150, plain, (~id(esk3_2(X15,esk6_1(X8)),esk3_2(X10,esk4_2(esk6_1(X6),esk3_2(X9,esk6_1(X7)))))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_150, ...])).
0.72/0.89	# End printing tableau
0.72/0.89	# SZS output end
0.72/0.89	# Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
0.72/0.89	# Returning from population with 3 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
0.72/0.89	# We now have 3 tableaux to operate on
0.72/0.89	# Found closed tableau during pool population.
0.72/0.89	# Proof search is over...
0.72/0.89	# Freeing feature tree
0.72/0.90	EOF