0.07/0.12	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.07/0.13	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.12/0.34	% Computer   : n016.cluster.edu
0.12/0.34	% Model      : x86_64 x86_64
0.12/0.34	% CPU        : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.12/0.34	% Memory     : 8042.1875MB
0.12/0.34	% OS         : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.12/0.34	% CPULimit   : 1200
0.12/0.34	% WCLimit    : 120
0.12/0.34	% DateTime   : Tue Jul 13 10:53:23 EDT 2021
0.12/0.34	% CPUTime    : 
0.20/0.47	Running first-order theorem proving
0.20/0.47	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --free-numbers --proof-object --auto-schedule --cpu-limit=120 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.20/0.47	# Version: 2.6
0.20/0.47	# No SInE strategy applied
0.20/0.47	# Trying AutoSched0 for 59 seconds
0.20/0.50	# AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S024I
0.20/0.50	# and selection function SelectOptimalRestrPDepth2.
0.20/0.50	#
0.20/0.50	# Preprocessing time       : 0.028 s
0.20/0.50	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.20/0.50	
0.20/0.50	# Proof found!
0.20/0.50	# SZS status Theorem
0.20/0.50	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.20/0.50	fof(x2138, conjecture, (?[X1]:![X2]:?[X3]:![X4]:(big_s(X3,X4)=>![X5]:(big_f(X4,X5)=>big_d(X5,X1,X2)))<=((?[X6]:![X2]:?[X7]:![X4]:(big_d(X4,X6,X2)<=big_s(X7,X4))&![X2]:?[X8]:![X9, X10]:(![X1, X5]:((big_f(X10,X5)&big_f(X9,X1))=>big_d(X1,X5,X2))<=big_d(X9,X10,X8)))&![X6]:?[X1]:big_f(X6,X1))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', x2138)).
0.20/0.50	fof(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~((((?[X6]:![X2]:?[X7]:![X4]:(big_s(X7,X4)=>big_d(X4,X6,X2))&![X2]:?[X8]:![X9, X10]:(big_d(X9,X10,X8)=>![X1, X5]:((big_f(X10,X5)&big_f(X9,X1))=>big_d(X1,X5,X2))))&![X6]:?[X1]:big_f(X6,X1))=>?[X1]:![X2]:?[X3]:![X4]:(big_s(X3,X4)=>![X5]:(big_f(X4,X5)=>big_d(X5,X1,X2))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[x2138])])).
0.20/0.50	fof(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X29, X31, X32, X34, X35, X36, X37, X38, X40, X42]:((((~big_s(esk2_1(X29),X31)|big_d(X31,esk1_0,X29))&(~big_d(X34,X35,esk3_1(X32))|(~big_f(X35,X37)|~big_f(X34,X36)|big_d(X36,X37,X32))))&big_f(X38,esk4_1(X38)))&(big_s(X42,esk6_2(X40,X42))&(big_f(esk6_2(X40,X42),esk7_2(X40,X42))&~big_d(esk7_2(X40,X42),X40,esk5_1(X40))))), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])).
0.20/0.50	cnf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, (~big_d(esk7_2(X1,X2),X1,esk5_1(X1))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.20/0.50	cnf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, (big_d(X5,X4,X3)|~big_d(X1,X2,esk3_1(X3))|~big_f(X2,X4)|~big_f(X1,X5)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.20/0.50	cnf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, (big_d(X2,esk1_0,X1)|~big_s(esk2_1(X1),X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.20/0.50	cnf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, (big_s(X1,esk6_2(X2,X1))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.20/0.50	cnf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, (~big_d(X1,X2,esk3_1(esk5_1(X3)))|~big_f(X1,esk7_2(X3,X4))|~big_f(X2,X3)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_4])).
0.20/0.50	cnf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, (big_d(esk6_2(X1,esk2_1(X2)),esk1_0,X2)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_6])).
0.20/0.50	cnf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, (~big_f(esk6_2(X1,esk2_1(esk3_1(esk5_1(X2)))),esk7_2(X2,X3))|~big_f(esk1_0,X2)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_8])).
0.20/0.50	cnf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, (big_f(esk6_2(X1,X2),esk7_2(X1,X2))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.20/0.50	cnf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, (~big_f(esk1_0,X1)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_10])).
0.20/0.50	cnf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, (big_f(X1,esk4_1(X1))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.20/0.50	cnf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12]), ['proof']).
0.20/0.50	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.20/0.50	# Proof object total steps             : 14
0.20/0.50	# Proof object clause steps            : 11
0.20/0.50	# Proof object formula steps           : 3
0.20/0.50	# Proof object conjectures             : 14
0.20/0.50	# Proof object clause conjectures      : 11
0.20/0.50	# Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
0.20/0.50	# Proof object initial clauses used    : 6
0.20/0.50	# Proof object initial formulas used   : 1
0.20/0.50	# Proof object generating inferences   : 5
0.20/0.50	# Proof object simplifying inferences  : 0
0.20/0.50	# Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
0.20/0.50	# Parsed axioms                        : 1
0.20/0.50	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.20/0.50	# Initial clauses                      : 6
0.20/0.50	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.20/0.50	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 6
0.20/0.50	# Processed clauses                    : 16
0.20/0.50	# ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.20/0.50	# ...subsumed                          : 0
0.20/0.50	# ...remaining for further processing  : 16
0.20/0.50	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.20/0.50	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.20/0.50	# Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.20/0.50	# Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.20/0.50	# Generated clauses                    : 8
0.20/0.50	# ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 7
0.20/0.50	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.20/0.50	# Paramodulations                      : 8
0.20/0.50	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.20/0.50	# NegExts                              : 0
0.20/0.50	# Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.20/0.50	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.20/0.50	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.20/0.50	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.20/0.50	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.20/0.50	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.20/0.50	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.20/0.50	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.20/0.50	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.20/0.50	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.20/0.50	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.20/0.50	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.20/0.50	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.20/0.50	# Current number of processed clauses  : 10
0.20/0.50	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 4
0.20/0.50	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.20/0.50	#    Negative unit clauses             : 2
0.20/0.50	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 4
0.20/0.50	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3
0.20/0.50	# ...number of literals in the above   : 14
0.20/0.50	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.20/0.50	# Current number of archived clauses   : 6
0.20/0.50	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
0.20/0.50	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
0.20/0.50	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
0.20/0.50	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
0.20/0.50	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.20/0.50	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
0.20/0.50	# BW rewrite match successes           : 0
0.20/0.50	# Condensation attempts                : 0
0.20/0.50	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.20/0.50	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 808
0.20/0.50	
0.20/0.50	# -------------------------------------------------
0.20/0.50	# User time                : 0.024 s
0.20/0.50	# System time              : 0.007 s
0.20/0.50	# Total time               : 0.031 s
0.20/0.50	# Maximum resident set size: 1588 pages
0.20/0.50	EOF
