0.00/0.10	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.11	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.10/0.31	% Computer   : n007.cluster.edu
0.10/0.31	% Model      : x86_64 x86_64
0.10/0.31	% CPU        : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.10/0.31	% Memory     : 8042.1875MB
0.10/0.31	% OS         : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.10/0.31	% CPULimit   : 1200
0.10/0.31	% WCLimit    : 120
0.10/0.31	% DateTime   : Tue Jul 13 10:55:19 EDT 2021
0.10/0.31	% CPUTime    : 
0.16/0.46	Running first-order theorem proving
0.16/0.46	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --free-numbers --proof-object --auto-schedule --cpu-limit=120 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.16/0.46	# Version: 2.6
0.16/0.47	# No SInE strategy applied
0.16/0.47	# Trying AutoSched0 for 59 seconds
0.16/0.58	# AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___200_C45_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S4S
0.16/0.58	# and selection function SelectNewComplexAHPNS.
0.16/0.58	#
0.16/0.58	# Preprocessing time       : 0.075 s
0.16/0.58	
0.16/0.58	# Proof found!
0.16/0.58	# SZS status Theorem
0.16/0.58	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.16/0.58	fof(query98, conjecture, ?[X5]:(borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,X5)<=mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', query98)).
0.16/0.58	fof(ax1_207, axiom, (mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)=>borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,c_georegion_l4_x45_y10)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax', ax1_207)).
0.16/0.58	fof(ax1_1123, axiom, ![X20, X21]:((mtvisible(X20)&genlmt(X20,X21))=>mtvisible(X21)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax', ax1_1123)).
0.16/0.58	fof(ax1_140, axiom, genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member1_mt), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax', ax1_140)).
0.16/0.58	fof(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X5]:(mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)=>borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,X5))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query98])])).
0.16/0.58	fof(c_0_5, plain, (~mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)|borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,c_georegion_l4_x45_y10)), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_207])).
0.16/0.58	fof(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X2265]:(mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)&~borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,X2265)), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])).
0.16/0.58	fof(c_0_7, plain, ![X2055, X2056]:(~mtvisible(X2055)|~genlmt(X2055,X2056)|mtvisible(X2056)), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_1123])])).
0.16/0.58	cnf(c_0_8, plain, (borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,c_georegion_l4_x45_y10)|~mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
0.16/0.58	cnf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, (~borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.16/0.58	cnf(c_0_10, plain, (mtvisible(X2)|~mtvisible(X1)|~genlmt(X1,X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.16/0.58	cnf(c_0_11, plain, (genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax1_140])).
0.16/0.58	cnf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, (mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.16/0.58	cnf(c_0_13, plain, (~mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_9])).
0.16/0.58	cnf(c_0_14, plain, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11]), c_0_12])]), c_0_13]), ['proof']).
0.16/0.58	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.16/0.58	# Proof object total steps             : 15
0.16/0.58	# Proof object clause steps            : 7
0.16/0.58	# Proof object formula steps           : 8
0.16/0.58	# Proof object conjectures             : 5
0.16/0.58	# Proof object clause conjectures      : 2
0.16/0.58	# Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
0.16/0.58	# Proof object initial clauses used    : 5
0.16/0.58	# Proof object initial formulas used   : 4
0.16/0.58	# Proof object generating inferences   : 1
0.16/0.58	# Proof object simplifying inferences  : 4
0.16/0.58	# Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
0.16/0.58	# Parsed axioms                        : 1132
0.16/0.58	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.16/0.58	# Initial clauses                      : 1133
0.16/0.58	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.16/0.58	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 1133
0.16/0.58	# Processed clauses                    : 939
0.16/0.58	# ...of these trivial                  : 1
0.16/0.58	# ...subsumed                          : 14
0.16/0.58	# ...remaining for further processing  : 924
0.16/0.58	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.16/0.58	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.16/0.58	# Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.16/0.58	# Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.16/0.58	# Generated clauses                    : 338
0.16/0.58	# ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 275
0.16/0.58	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.16/0.58	# Paramodulations                      : 338
0.16/0.58	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.16/0.58	# NegExts                              : 0
0.16/0.58	# Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.16/0.58	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.16/0.58	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.16/0.58	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.16/0.58	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.16/0.58	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.16/0.58	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.16/0.58	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.16/0.58	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.16/0.58	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.16/0.58	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.16/0.58	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.16/0.58	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.16/0.58	# Current number of processed clauses  : 924
0.16/0.58	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 285
0.16/0.58	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.16/0.58	#    Negative unit clauses             : 5
0.16/0.58	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 634
0.16/0.58	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 458
0.16/0.58	# ...number of literals in the above   : 726
0.16/0.58	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.16/0.58	# Current number of archived clauses   : 0
0.16/0.58	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 48060
0.16/0.58	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 46185
0.16/0.58	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 12
0.16/0.58	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 245
0.16/0.59	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.16/0.59	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
0.16/0.59	# BW rewrite match successes           : 0
0.16/0.59	# Condensation attempts                : 0
0.16/0.59	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.16/0.59	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 66408
0.16/0.59	
0.16/0.59	# -------------------------------------------------
0.16/0.59	# User time                : 0.112 s
0.16/0.59	# System time              : 0.016 s
0.16/0.59	# Total time               : 0.128 s
0.16/0.59	# Maximum resident set size: 2540 pages
0.16/0.59	EOF
