0.00/0.12	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.09/0.13	% Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
0.09/0.36	% Computer   : n026.cluster.edu
0.09/0.36	% Model      : x86_64 x86_64
0.09/0.36	% CPU        : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.09/0.36	% Memory     : 8042.1875MB
0.09/0.36	% OS         : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.09/0.36	% CPULimit   : 1200
0.09/0.36	% WCLimit    : 120
0.09/0.36	% DateTime   : Tue Jul 13 12:59:14 EDT 2021
0.09/0.36	% CPUTime    : 
0.15/0.47	openjdk version "1.8.0_171"
0.15/0.47	OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_171-b10)
0.15/0.47	OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.171-b10, mixed mode)
0.15/0.48	file=/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.60/0.88	start to proof: theBenchmark
0.63/0.91	% Version  : CSE_E---1.3
0.63/0.91	% Problem  : theBenchmark.p
0.63/0.91	% Proof found
0.63/0.91	% SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
0.63/0.91	% SZS output start Proof
0.63/0.91	fof(xplustwoidy, conjecture, ?[X27, X9, X10]:(id(X10,X9)&?[X60]:(?[X61]:(r2(X61,X60)&?[X12]:(r1(X12)&r2(X12,X61)))&r3(X27,X60,X10))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', xplustwoidy)).
0.63/0.91	fof(axiom_1a, axiom, ![X58, X59]:?[X60]:(?[X61]:(?[X62]:(r2(X59,X62)&r3(X58,X62,X61))&id(X61,X60))&?[X63]:(r2(X63,X60)&r3(X58,X59,X63))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM009+0.ax', axiom_1a)).
0.63/0.91	fof(axiom_6, axiom, ![X44, X45]:(id(X45,X44)|~(id(X44,X45))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM009+0.ax', axiom_6)).
0.63/0.91	fof(axiom_4a, axiom, ![X14]:?[X15]:(?[X16]:(r1(X16)&r3(X14,X16,X15))&id(X15,X14)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM009+0.ax', axiom_4a)).
0.63/0.91	fof(axiom_2, axiom, ![X17]:?[X18]:![X19]:((id(X19,X18)&r2(X17,X19))|(~(r2(X17,X19))&~(id(X19,X18)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM009+0.ax', axiom_2)).
0.63/0.91	fof(axiom_5, axiom, ![X13]:id(X13,X13), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM009+0.ax', axiom_5)).
0.63/0.91	fof(axiom_1, axiom, ?[X52]:![X53]:((id(X53,X52)&r1(X53))|(~(r1(X53))&~(id(X53,X52)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM009+0.ax', axiom_1)).
0.63/0.91	fof(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X27, X9, X10]:(id(X10,X9)&?[X60]:(?[X61]:(r2(X61,X60)&?[X12]:(r1(X12)&r2(X12,X61)))&r3(X27,X60,X10)))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[xplustwoidy])).
0.63/0.91	fof(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X135, X136, X137, X138, X139, X140]:(~id(X137,X136)|(~r2(X139,X138)|(~r1(X140)|~r2(X140,X139))|~r3(X135,X138,X137))), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])).
0.63/0.91	fof(c_0_9, plain, ![X125, X126]:(((r2(X126,esk19_2(X125,X126))&r3(X125,esk19_2(X125,X126),esk18_2(X125,X126)))&id(esk18_2(X125,X126),esk17_2(X125,X126)))&(r2(esk20_2(X125,X126),esk17_2(X125,X126))&r3(X125,X126,esk20_2(X125,X126)))), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[axiom_1a])])).
0.63/0.91	fof(c_0_10, plain, ![X111, X112]:(id(X112,X111)|~id(X111,X112)), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_6])])).
0.63/0.91	fof(c_0_11, plain, ![X81]:((r1(esk6_1(X81))&r3(X81,esk6_1(X81),esk5_1(X81)))&id(esk5_1(X81),X81)), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[axiom_4a])])).
0.63/0.91	cnf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, (~id(X1,X2)|~r2(X3,X4)|~r1(X5)|~r2(X5,X3)|~r3(X6,X4,X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.63/0.91	cnf(c_0_13, plain, (r3(X1,X2,esk20_2(X1,X2))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.63/0.91	cnf(c_0_14, plain, (id(X1,X2)|~id(X2,X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])).
0.63/0.91	cnf(c_0_15, plain, (id(esk5_1(X1),X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])).
0.63/0.91	fof(c_0_16, plain, ![X84, X86]:(((~r2(X84,X86)|id(X86,esk7_1(X84)))&(~id(X86,esk7_1(X84))|id(X86,esk7_1(X84))))&((~r2(X84,X86)|r2(X84,X86))&(~id(X86,esk7_1(X84))|r2(X84,X86)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_2])])])])).
0.63/0.91	fof(c_0_17, plain, ![X80]:id(X80,X80), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[axiom_5])).
0.63/0.91	cnf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, (~r1(X1)|~r2(X1,X2)|~r2(X2,X3)|~id(esk20_2(X4,X3),X5)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_13])).
0.63/0.91	cnf(c_0_19, plain, (id(X1,esk5_1(X1))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15])).
0.63/0.91	cnf(c_0_20, plain, (r2(X2,X1)|~id(X1,esk7_1(X2))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])).
0.63/0.91	cnf(c_0_21, plain, (id(X1,X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])).
0.63/0.91	fof(c_0_22, plain, ![X120]:(((~r1(X120)|id(X120,esk13_0))&(~id(X120,esk13_0)|id(X120,esk13_0)))&((~r1(X120)|r1(X120))&(~id(X120,esk13_0)|r1(X120)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_1])])])])).
0.63/0.92	cnf(c_0_23, negated_conjecture, (~r1(X1)|~r2(X1,X2)|~r2(X2,X3)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_19])).
0.63/0.92	cnf(c_0_24, plain, (r2(X1,esk7_1(X1))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20, c_0_21])).
0.63/0.92	cnf(c_0_25, plain, (r1(X1)|~id(X1,esk13_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22])).
0.63/0.92	cnf(c_0_26, negated_conjecture, (~r1(X1)|~r2(esk7_1(X1),X2)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23, c_0_24])).
0.63/0.92	cnf(c_0_27, plain, (r2(X1,esk19_2(X2,X1))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.63/0.92	cnf(c_0_28, plain, (r1(esk13_0)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25, c_0_21])).
0.63/0.92	cnf(c_0_29, negated_conjecture, (~r1(X1)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26, c_0_27])).
0.63/0.92	cnf(c_0_30, plain, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_28, c_0_29]), ['proof']).
0.63/0.92	% SZS output end Proof
0.63/0.92	% Total time : 0.034000 s
0.63/0.93	EOF