0.04/0.13 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.04/0.13 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 1200 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Jul 13 16:21:03 EDT 2021 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime : 0.46/1.06 ============================== Prover9 =============================== 0.46/1.06 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009. 0.46/1.06 Process 28028 was started by sandbox2 on n005.cluster.edu, 0.46/1.06 Tue Jul 13 16:21:04 2021 0.46/1.06 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 1200 -f /tmp/Prover9_27761_n005.cluster.edu". 0.46/1.06 ============================== end of head =========================== 0.46/1.06 0.46/1.06 ============================== INPUT ================================= 0.46/1.06 0.46/1.06 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_27761_n005.cluster.edu 0.46/1.06 0.46/1.06 set(prolog_style_variables). 0.46/1.06 set(auto2). 0.46/1.06 % set(auto2) -> set(auto). 0.46/1.06 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference). 0.46/1.06 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup). 0.46/1.06 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim). 0.46/1.06 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold). 0.46/1.06 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits). 0.46/1.06 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000"). 0.46/1.06 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000). 0.46/1.06 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials). 0.46/1.06 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process). 0.46/1.06 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1). 0.46/1.06 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3). 0.46/1.06 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000"). 0.46/1.06 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1). 0.46/1.06 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600). 0.46/1.06 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0). 0.46/1.06 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5). 0.46/1.06 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300). 0.46/1.06 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos). 0.46/1.06 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1). 0.46/1.06 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000). 0.46/1.06 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400). 0.46/1.06 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some). 0.46/1.06 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input). 0.46/1.06 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet). 0.46/1.06 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses). 0.46/1.06 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given). 0.46/1.06 assign(lrs_ticks,-1). 0.46/1.06 assign(sos_limit,10000). 0.46/1.06 assign(order,kbo). 0.46/1.06 set(lex_order_vars). 0.46/1.06 clear(print_given). 0.46/1.06 0.46/1.06 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (13 formulas) 0.46/1.06 0.46/1.06 ============================== end of input ========================== 0.46/1.06 0.46/1.06 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 1200). 0.46/1.06 0.46/1.06 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ========== 0.46/1.06 0.46/1.06 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses: 0.46/1.06 1 (all X all Y all Re all C all P all P1 all P2 all C1 all C2 all Ta all Tb all Tc (organization(Y,Ta) & reorganization(X,Ta,Tb) & reorganization(Y,Ta,Tc) & reorganization_type(Y,Re,Ta) & complexity(X,C1,Ta) & complexity(Y,C2,Ta) & greater(C2,C1) & survival_chance(Y,P2,Tb) & survival_chance(X,P1,Tb) & reorganization_type(X,Re,Ta) & survival_chance(Y,P,Ta) & survival_chance(X,P,Ta) & class(Y,C,Ta) & class(X,C,Ta) & organization(Y,Tb) & organization(X,Tb) & organization(X,Ta) -> P2 = P1 | greater(P1,P2))) # label(a11_FOL) # label(hypothesis) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.46/1.06 2 (all X all Y all Re all C all C1 all C2 all Ta all Tb all Tc (organization(X,Ta) & class(X,C,Ta) & reorganization(X,Ta,Tb) & reorganization_type(X,Re,Ta) & complexity(X,C1,Ta) & greater(C2,C1) & complexity(Y,C2,Ta) & reorganization_type(Y,Re,Ta) & reorganization(Y,Ta,Tc) & class(Y,C,Ta) & organization(Y,Tc) & organization(Y,Ta) -> greater(Tc,Tb))) # label(a10_FOL) # label(hypothesis) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.46/1.06 3 (all X all Y all P1 all P2 all T (survival_chance(Y,P2,T) & survival_chance(X,P1,T) -> P1 = P2 | greater(P2,P1) | greater(P1,P2))) # label(mp14) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.46/1.06 4 (all X all Ta all Tb (reorganization(X,Ta,Tb) -> greater(Tb,Ta))) # label(mp7) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.46/1.06 5 (all X all Y all Z (greater(Y,Z) & greater(X,Y) -> greater(X,Z))) # label(mp11) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.46/1.06 6 (all X all T (organization(X,T) -> (exists P survival_chance(X,P,T)))) # label(mp12) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.46/1.06 7 (all X all T all T1 all T2 (organization(X,T2) & greater(T,T1) & greater(T2,T) & organization(X,T1) -> organization(X,T))) # label(mp13) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.46/1.06 8 (all X all P1 all P2 all T1 all T2 (organization(X,T1) & greater(T2,T1) & survival_chance(X,P2,T2) & survival_chance(X,P1,T1) & reorganization_free(X,T1,T2) & organization(X,T2) -> greater(P2,P1))) # label(t3_FOL) # label(hypothesis) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 1.67/2.04 9 (all X all P1 all P2 all T1 all T2 all Ta all Tb (organization(X,T1) & organization(X,T2) & survival_chance(X,P1,T1) & -greater(Ta,T1) & greater(T2,T1) & -greater(T2,Tb) & survival_chance(X,P2,T2) & reorganization(X,Ta,Tb) -> greater(P1,P2))) # label(t4_FOL) # label(hypothesis) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 1.67/2.04 10 (all X all Y -(greater(Y,X) & greater(X,Y))) # label(mp6_2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 1.67/2.04 11 (all X all Y -(Y = X & greater(X,Y))) # label(mp6_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 1.67/2.04 12 (all X all Y all Px1 all Px2 all Py1 all Py2 all T1 all T2 (greater(T2,T1) & survival_chance(X,Px1,T1) & survival_chance(X,Px2,T2) & greater(Py1,Px2) & greater(Px2,Px1) & survival_chance(Y,Py2,T2) & survival_chance(Y,Py1,T1) -> (exists T0 exists Px0 exists Py0 (greater(T2,T0) & Px0 = Py0 & survival_chance(Y,Py0,T0) & survival_chance(X,Px0,T0) & greater(T0,T1))))) # label(a15_FOL) # label(hypothesis) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 1.67/2.04 13 -(all X all Y all Re all C all P all P1 all P2 all C1 all C2 all T all Ta all Tb all Tc (class(Y,C,Ta) & survival_chance(X,P,Ta) & survival_chance(Y,P,Ta) & reorganization(X,Ta,Tb) & reorganization(Y,Ta,Tc) & reorganization_type(X,Re,Ta) & survival_chance(X,P1,T) & greater(C2,C1) & (T = Tc -> greater(P1,P2)) & complexity(Y,C2,Ta) & complexity(X,C1,Ta) & survival_chance(Y,P2,T) & reorganization_free(X,Tb,Tc) & reorganization_type(Y,Re,Ta) & class(X,C,Ta) & organization(Y,Tc) & organization(X,Tc) & organization(Y,Ta) & organization(X,Ta) -> (T = Tb -> greater(P1,P2) | P2 = P1))) # label(t5_plus_FOL) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 1.67/2.04 1.67/2.04 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas === 1.67/2.04 1.67/2.04 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES =============== 1.67/2.04 1.67/2.04 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION ================= 1.67/2.04 14 -organization(A,B) | -greater(C,B) | -survival_chance(A,D,C) | -survival_chance(A,E,B) | -reorganization_free(A,B,C) | -organization(A,C) | greater(D,E) # label(t3_FOL) # label(hypothesis). [clausify(8)]. 1.67/2.04 15 reorganization_free(c1,c12,c13) # label(t5_plus_FOL) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(13)]. 1.67/2.04 Derived: -organization(c1,c12) | -greater(c13,c12) | -survival_chance(c1,A,c13) | -survival_chance(c1,B,c12) | -organization(c1,c13) | greater(A,B). [resolve(14,e,15,a)]. 1.67/2.04 1.67/2.04 ============================== end predicate elimination ============= 1.67/2.04 1.67/2.04 Auto_denials: (non-Horn, no changes). 1.67/2.04 1.67/2.04 Term ordering decisions: 1.67/2.04 Function symbol KB weights: c1=1. c2=1. c3=1. c4=1. c5=1. c6=1. c7=1. c8=1. c9=1. c10=1. c11=1. c12=1. c13=1. f1=1. f2=1. f3=1. f4=1. 1.67/2.04 1.67/2.04 ============================== end of process initial clauses ======== 1.67/2.04 1.67/2.04 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ==================== 1.67/2.04 1.67/2.04 ============================== end of clauses for search ============= 1.67/2.04 1.67/2.04 ============================== SEARCH ================================ 1.67/2.04 1.67/2.04 % Starting search at 0.02 seconds. 1.67/2.04 1.67/2.04 NOTE: Back_subsumption disabled, ratio of kept to back_subsumed is 38 (0.00 of 0.31 sec). 1.67/2.04 1.67/2.04 ============================== PROOF ================================= 1.67/2.04 % SZS status Theorem 1.67/2.04 % SZS output start Refutation 1.67/2.04 1.67/2.04 % Proof 1 at 0.98 (+ 0.01) seconds. 1.67/2.04 % Length of proof is 48. 1.67/2.04 % Level of proof is 10. 1.67/2.04 % Maximum clause weight is 69.000. 1.67/2.04 % Given clauses 1392. 1.67/2.04 1.67/2.04 1 (all X all Y all Re all C all P all P1 all P2 all C1 all C2 all Ta all Tb all Tc (organization(Y,Ta) & reorganization(X,Ta,Tb) & reorganization(Y,Ta,Tc) & reorganization_type(Y,Re,Ta) & complexity(X,C1,Ta) & complexity(Y,C2,Ta) & greater(C2,C1) & survival_chance(Y,P2,Tb) & survival_chance(X,P1,Tb) & reorganization_type(X,Re,Ta) & survival_chance(Y,P,Ta) & survival_chance(X,P,Ta) & class(Y,C,Ta) & class(X,C,Ta) & organization(Y,Tb) & organization(X,Tb) & organization(X,Ta) -> P2 = P1 | greater(P1,P2))) # label(a11_FOL) # label(hypothesis) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 1.67/2.04 2 (all X all Y all Re all C all C1 all C2 all Ta all Tb all Tc (organization(X,Ta) & class(X,C,Ta) & reorganization(X,Ta,Tb) & reorganization_type(X,Re,Ta) & complexity(X,C1,Ta) & greater(C2,C1) & complexity(Y,C2,Ta) & reorganization_type(Y,Re,Ta) & reorganization(Y,Ta,Tc) & class(Y,C,Ta) & organization(Y,Tc) & organization(Y,Ta) -> greater(Tc,Tb))) # label(a10_FOL) # label(hypothesis) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 1.77/2.04 4 (all X all Ta all Tb (reorganization(X,Ta,Tb) -> greater(Tb,Ta))) # label(mp7) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 1.77/2.04 7 (all X all T all T1 all T2 (organization(X,T2) & greater(T,T1) & greater(T2,T) & organization(X,T1) -> organization(X,T))) # label(mp13) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 1.77/2.04 13 -(all X all Y all Re all C all P all P1 all P2 all C1 all C2 all T all Ta all Tb all Tc (class(Y,C,Ta) & survival_chance(X,P,Ta) & survival_chance(Y,P,Ta) & reorganization(X,Ta,Tb) & reorganization(Y,Ta,Tc) & reorganization_type(X,Re,Ta) & survival_chance(X,P1,T) & greater(C2,C1) & (T = Tc -> greater(P1,P2)) & complexity(Y,C2,Ta) & complexity(X,C1,Ta) & survival_chance(Y,P2,T) & reorganization_free(X,Tb,Tc) & reorganization_type(Y,Re,Ta) & class(X,C,Ta) & organization(Y,Tc) & organization(X,Tc) & organization(Y,Ta) & organization(X,Ta) -> (T = Tb -> greater(P1,P2) | P2 = P1))) # label(t5_plus_FOL) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 1.77/2.04 16 greater(c9,c8) # label(t5_plus_FOL) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(13)]. 1.77/2.04 17 organization(c2,c13) # label(t5_plus_FOL) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(13)]. 1.77/2.04 18 organization(c1,c13) # label(t5_plus_FOL) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(13)]. 1.77/2.04 19 organization(c2,c11) # label(t5_plus_FOL) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(13)]. 1.77/2.04 20 organization(c1,c11) # label(t5_plus_FOL) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(13)]. 1.77/2.04 21 c10 = c12 # label(t5_plus_FOL) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(13)]. 1.77/2.04 22 c12 = c10. [copy(21),flip(a)]. 1.77/2.04 23 class(c2,c4,c11) # label(t5_plus_FOL) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(13)]. 1.77/2.04 24 survival_chance(c1,c5,c11) # label(t5_plus_FOL) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(13)]. 1.77/2.04 25 survival_chance(c2,c5,c11) # label(t5_plus_FOL) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(13)]. 1.77/2.04 26 reorganization(c1,c11,c12) # label(t5_plus_FOL) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(13)]. 1.77/2.04 27 reorganization(c1,c11,c10). [copy(26),rewrite([22(3)])]. 1.77/2.04 28 reorganization(c2,c11,c13) # label(t5_plus_FOL) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(13)]. 1.77/2.04 29 reorganization_type(c1,c3,c11) # label(t5_plus_FOL) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(13)]. 1.77/2.04 30 survival_chance(c1,c6,c10) # label(t5_plus_FOL) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(13)]. 1.77/2.04 31 complexity(c2,c9,c11) # label(t5_plus_FOL) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(13)]. 1.77/2.04 32 complexity(c1,c8,c11) # label(t5_plus_FOL) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(13)]. 1.77/2.04 33 survival_chance(c2,c7,c10) # label(t5_plus_FOL) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(13)]. 1.77/2.04 34 reorganization_type(c2,c3,c11) # label(t5_plus_FOL) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(13)]. 1.77/2.04 35 class(c1,c4,c11) # label(t5_plus_FOL) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(13)]. 1.77/2.04 36 -greater(c6,c7) # label(t5_plus_FOL) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(13)]. 1.77/2.04 37 c7 != c6 # label(t5_plus_FOL) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(13)]. 1.77/2.04 42 -reorganization(A,B,C) | greater(C,B) # label(mp7) # label(axiom). [clausify(4)]. 1.77/2.04 45 -organization(A,B) | -greater(C,D) | -greater(B,C) | -organization(A,D) | organization(A,C) # label(mp13) # label(axiom). [clausify(7)]. 1.77/2.04 53 -organization(A,B) | -class(A,C,B) | -reorganization(A,B,D) | -reorganization_type(A,E,B) | -complexity(A,F,B) | -greater(V6,F) | -complexity(V7,V6,B) | -reorganization_type(V7,E,B) | -reorganization(V7,B,V8) | -class(V7,C,B) | -organization(V7,V8) | -organization(V7,B) | greater(V8,D) # label(a10_FOL) # label(hypothesis). [clausify(2)]. 1.77/2.04 54 -organization(A,B) | -reorganization(C,B,D) | -reorganization(A,B,E) | -reorganization_type(A,F,B) | -complexity(C,V6,B) | -complexity(A,V7,B) | -greater(V7,V6) | -survival_chance(A,V8,D) | -survival_chance(C,V9,D) | -reorganization_type(C,F,B) | -survival_chance(A,V10,B) | -survival_chance(C,V10,B) | -class(A,V11,B) | -class(C,V11,B) | -organization(A,D) | -organization(C,D) | -organization(C,B) | V8 = V9 | greater(V9,V8) # label(a11_FOL) # label(hypothesis). [clausify(1)]. 1.77/2.04 98 greater(c10,c11). [resolve(42,a,27,a)]. 1.77/2.04 108 -greater(A,B) | -greater(c13,A) | -organization(c1,B) | organization(c1,A). [resolve(45,a,18,a)]. 1.77/2.04 109 -greater(A,B) | -greater(c13,A) | -organization(c2,B) | organization(c2,A). [resolve(45,a,17,a)]. 1.77/2.04 424 -class(c1,A,c11) | -reorganization(c1,c11,B) | -complexity(c1,C,c11) | -greater(D,C) | -complexity(E,D,c11) | -reorganization_type(E,c3,c11) | -reorganization(E,c11,F) | -class(E,A,c11) | -organization(E,F) | -organization(E,c11) | greater(F,B). [resolve(53,d,29,a),unit_del(a,20)]. 1.77/2.04 860 -greater(A,c11) | -greater(c13,A) | organization(c1,A). [resolve(108,c,20,a)]. 1.77/2.04 861 -greater(c13,c10) | organization(c1,c10). [resolve(860,a,98,a)]. 1.77/2.04 862 -greater(A,c11) | -greater(c13,A) | organization(c2,A). [resolve(109,c,19,a)]. 1.77/2.04 865 -greater(c13,c10) | organization(c2,c10). [resolve(862,a,98,a)]. 1.77/2.04 2088 -class(c1,A,c11) | -reorganization(c1,c11,B) | -complexity(c1,C,c11) | -greater(D,C) | -complexity(c2,D,c11) | -reorganization(c2,c11,E) | -class(c2,A,c11) | -organization(c2,E) | greater(E,B). [resolve(424,f,34,a),unit_del(i,19)]. 1.77/2.04 2089 -class(c1,A,c11) | -reorganization(c1,c11,B) | -greater(C,c8) | -complexity(c2,C,c11) | -reorganization(c2,c11,D) | -class(c2,A,c11) | -organization(c2,D) | greater(D,B). [resolve(2088,c,32,a)]. 1.77/2.04 2091 -class(c1,A,c11) | -reorganization(c1,c11,B) | -reorganization(c2,c11,C) | -class(c2,A,c11) | -organization(c2,C) | greater(C,B). [resolve(2089,d,31,a),unit_del(c,16)]. 1.77/2.04 2092 -reorganization(c1,c11,A) | -reorganization(c2,c11,B) | -organization(c2,B) | greater(B,A). [resolve(2091,d,23,a),unit_del(a,35)]. 1.77/2.04 2094 -reorganization(c1,c11,A) | greater(c13,A). [resolve(2092,b,28,a),unit_del(b,17)]. 1.77/2.04 2095 greater(c13,c10). [resolve(2094,a,27,a)]. 1.77/2.04 2232 organization(c2,c10). [back_unit_del(865),unit_del(a,2095)]. 1.77/2.04 2233 organization(c1,c10). [back_unit_del(861),unit_del(a,2095)]. 1.77/2.04 2432 $F. [ur(54,a,19,a,b,27,a,c,28,a,d,34,a,e,32,a,f,31,a,g,16,a,h,33,a,i,30,a,j,29,a,k,25,a,l,24,a,m,23,a,n,35,a,o,2232,a,q,20,a,r,37,a,s,36,a),unit_del(a,2233)]. 1.77/2.04 1.77/2.04 % SZS output end Refutation 1.77/2.04 ============================== end of proof ========================== 1.77/2.04 1.77/2.04 ============================== STATISTICS ============================ 1.77/2.04 1.77/2.04 Given=1392. Generated=9161. Kept=2412. proofs=1. 1.77/2.04 Usable=1190. Sos=854. Demods=1. Limbo=10, Disabled=397. Hints=0. 1.77/2.04 Megabytes=4.05. 1.77/2.04 User_CPU=0.98, System_CPU=0.01, Wall_clock=1. 1.77/2.04 1.77/2.04 ============================== end of statistics ===================== 1.77/2.04 1.77/2.04 ============================== end of search ========================= 1.77/2.04 1.77/2.04 THEOREM PROVED 1.77/2.04 % SZS status Theorem 1.77/2.04 1.77/2.04 Exiting with 1 proof. 1.77/2.04 1.77/2.04 Process 28028 exit (max_proofs) Tue Jul 13 16:21:05 2021 1.77/2.04 Prover9 interrupted 1.77/2.04 EOF