0.02/0.09 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.02/0.09 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s 0.09/0.29 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu 0.09/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.09/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.09/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.09/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.09/0.29 % CPULimit : 1200 0.09/0.29 % DateTime : Tue Jul 13 16:13:33 EDT 2021 0.09/0.29 % CPUTime : 0.70/0.98 ============================== Prover9 =============================== 0.70/0.98 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009. 0.70/0.98 Process 14902 was started by sandbox on n013.cluster.edu, 0.70/0.98 Tue Jul 13 16:13:34 2021 0.70/0.98 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 1200 -f /tmp/Prover9_14749_n013.cluster.edu". 0.70/0.98 ============================== end of head =========================== 0.70/0.98 0.70/0.98 ============================== INPUT ================================= 0.70/0.98 0.70/0.98 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_14749_n013.cluster.edu 0.70/0.98 0.70/0.98 set(prolog_style_variables). 0.70/0.98 set(auto2). 0.70/0.98 % set(auto2) -> set(auto). 0.70/0.98 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference). 0.70/0.98 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup). 0.70/0.98 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim). 0.70/0.98 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold). 0.70/0.98 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits). 0.70/0.98 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000"). 0.70/0.98 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000). 0.70/0.98 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials). 0.70/0.98 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process). 0.70/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1). 0.70/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3). 0.70/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000"). 0.70/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1). 0.70/0.98 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600). 0.70/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0). 0.70/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5). 0.70/0.98 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300). 0.70/0.98 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos). 0.70/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1). 0.70/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000). 0.70/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400). 0.70/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some). 0.70/0.98 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input). 0.70/0.98 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet). 0.70/0.98 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses). 0.70/0.98 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given). 0.70/0.98 assign(lrs_ticks,-1). 0.70/0.98 assign(sos_limit,10000). 0.70/0.98 assign(order,kbo). 0.70/0.98 set(lex_order_vars). 0.70/0.98 clear(print_given). 0.70/0.98 0.70/0.98 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (43 formulas) 0.70/0.98 0.70/0.98 ============================== end of input ========================== 0.70/0.98 0.70/0.98 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 1200). 0.70/0.98 0.70/0.98 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ========== 0.70/0.98 0.70/0.98 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses: 0.70/0.98 1 implies_3 <-> (all X all Y all Z is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,Y),implies(implies(Y,Z),implies(X,Z))))) # label(implies_3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.70/0.98 2 (all P all Q all R is_a_theorem(implies(implies(P,Q),implies(implies(Q,R),implies(P,R))))) <-> cn1 # label(cn1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.70/0.98 3 (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(and(X,Y),X))) <-> and_1 # label(and_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.70/0.98 4 (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,implies(X,Y)),implies(X,Y)))) <-> implies_2 # label(implies_2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.70/0.98 5 (all X all Y (is_a_theorem(implies(X,Y)) & is_a_theorem(X) -> is_a_theorem(Y))) <-> modus_ponens # label(modus_ponens) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.70/0.98 6 (all P all Q is_a_theorem(implies(P,implies(not(P),Q)))) <-> cn2 # label(cn2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.70/0.98 7 (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(equiv(X,Y),implies(Y,X)))) <-> equivalence_2 # label(equivalence_2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.70/0.98 8 equivalence_3 <-> (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,Y),implies(implies(Y,X),equiv(X,Y))))) # label(equivalence_3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.70/0.98 9 equivalence_1 <-> (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(equiv(X,Y),implies(X,Y)))) # label(equivalence_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.70/0.98 10 (all P is_a_theorem(implies(or(P,P),P))) <-> r1 # label(r1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.70/0.98 11 and_2 <-> (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(and(X,Y),Y))) # label(and_2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.70/0.98 12 r3 <-> (all P all Q is_a_theorem(implies(or(P,Q),or(Q,P)))) # label(r3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.70/0.98 13 and_3 <-> (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(Y,and(X,Y))))) # label(and_3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.70/0.98 14 kn3 <-> (all P all Q all R is_a_theorem(implies(implies(P,Q),implies(not(and(Q,R)),not(and(R,P)))))) # label(kn3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 1.25/1.60 15 kn1 <-> (all P is_a_theorem(implies(P,and(P,P)))) # label(kn1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 1.25/1.60 16 or_2 <-> (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(Y,or(X,Y)))) # label(or_2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 1.25/1.60 17 or_1 <-> (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(X,or(X,Y)))) # label(or_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 1.25/1.60 18 (all P all Q all R is_a_theorem(implies(implies(Q,R),implies(or(P,Q),or(P,R))))) <-> r5 # label(r5) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 1.25/1.60 19 r4 <-> (all P all Q all R is_a_theorem(implies(or(P,or(Q,R)),or(Q,or(P,R))))) # label(r4) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 1.25/1.60 20 (all P all Q is_a_theorem(implies(and(P,Q),P))) <-> kn2 # label(kn2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 1.25/1.60 21 (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(Y),not(X)),implies(X,Y)))) <-> modus_tollens # label(modus_tollens) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 1.25/1.60 22 (all X all Y all Z is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,Z),implies(implies(Y,Z),implies(or(X,Y),Z))))) <-> or_3 # label(or_3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 1.25/1.60 23 implies_1 <-> (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(Y,X)))) # label(implies_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 1.25/1.60 24 r2 <-> (all P all Q is_a_theorem(implies(Q,or(P,Q)))) # label(r2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 1.25/1.60 25 cn3 <-> (all P is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(P),P),P))) # label(cn3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 1.25/1.60 26 (all X all Y (is_a_theorem(equiv(X,Y)) -> X = Y)) <-> substitution_of_equivalents # label(substitution_of_equivalents) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 1.25/1.60 27 op_implies_or -> (all X all Y implies(X,Y) = or(not(X),Y)) # label(op_implies_or) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 1.25/1.60 28 op_implies_and -> (all X all Y implies(X,Y) = not(and(X,not(Y)))) # label(op_implies_and) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 1.25/1.60 29 op_or -> (all X all Y or(X,Y) = not(and(not(X),not(Y)))) # label(op_or) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 1.25/1.60 30 op_equiv -> (all X all Y and(implies(X,Y),implies(Y,X)) = equiv(X,Y)) # label(op_equiv) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 1.25/1.60 31 op_and -> (all X all Y not(or(not(X),not(Y))) = and(X,Y)) # label(op_and) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 1.25/1.60 1.25/1.60 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas === 1.25/1.60 1.25/1.60 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES =============== 1.25/1.60 1.25/1.60 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION ================= 1.25/1.60 1.25/1.60 ============================== end predicate elimination ============= 1.25/1.60 1.25/1.60 Auto_denials: (non-Horn, no changes). 1.25/1.60 1.25/1.60 Term ordering decisions: 1.25/1.60 1.25/1.60 % Assigning unary symbol not kb_weight 0 and highest precedence (94). 1.25/1.60 Function symbol KB weights: c1=1. c2=1. c3=1. c4=1. c5=1. c6=1. c7=1. c8=1. c9=1. c10=1. c11=1. c12=1. c13=1. c14=1. c15=1. c16=1. c17=1. c18=1. c19=1. c20=1. c21=1. c22=1. c23=1. c24=1. c25=1. c26=1. c27=1. c28=1. c29=1. c30=1. c31=1. c32=1. c33=1. c34=1. c35=1. c36=1. c37=1. c38=1. c39=1. c40=1. c41=1. c42=1. c43=1. c44=1. c45=1. c46=1. c47=1. c48=1. c49=1. c50=1. c51=1. c52=1. c53=1. c54=1. c55=1. implies=1. or=1. and=1. equiv=1. not=0. 1.25/1.60 1.25/1.60 ============================== end of process initial clauses ======== 1.25/1.60 1.25/1.60 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ==================== 1.25/1.60 1.25/1.60 ============================== end of clauses for search ============= 1.25/1.60 1.25/1.60 ============================== SEARCH ================================ 1.25/1.60 1.25/1.60 % Starting search at 0.01 seconds. 1.25/1.60 1.25/1.60 Low Water (keep): wt=37.000, iters=3438 1.25/1.60 1.25/1.60 Low Water (keep): wt=31.000, iters=3353 1.25/1.60 1.25/1.60 Low Water (keep): wt=30.000, iters=3639 1.25/1.60 1.25/1.60 Low Water (keep): wt=25.000, iters=3390 1.25/1.60 1.25/1.60 Low Water (keep): wt=24.000, iters=3402 1.25/1.60 1.25/1.60 Low Water (keep): wt=23.000, iters=3361 1.25/1.60 1.25/1.60 Low Water (keep): wt=22.000, iters=3391 1.25/1.60 1.25/1.60 Low Water (keep): wt=21.000, iters=3427 1.25/1.60 1.25/1.60 Low Water (keep): wt=20.000, iters=3415 1.25/1.60 1.25/1.60 Low Water (keep): wt=19.000, iters=3351 3.61/3.91 3.61/3.91 Low Water (keep): wt=18.000, iters=3498 3.61/3.91 3.61/3.91 Low Water (keep): wt=17.000, iters=3348 3.61/3.91 3.61/3.91 Low Water (keep): wt=16.000, iters=3354 3.61/3.91 3.61/3.91 Low Water (keep): wt=15.000, iters=3436 3.61/3.91 3.61/3.91 Low Water (displace): id=3269, wt=51.000 3.61/3.91 3.61/3.91 Low Water (displace): id=3276, wt=49.000 3.61/3.91 3.61/3.91 Low Water (displace): id=1613, wt=47.000 3.61/3.91 3.61/3.91 Low Water (displace): id=2743, wt=45.000 3.61/3.91 3.61/3.91 Low Water (displace): id=3268, wt=43.000 3.61/3.91 3.61/3.91 Low Water (displace): id=3279, wt=41.000 3.61/3.91 3.61/3.91 Low Water (displace): id=3463, wt=40.000 3.61/3.91 3.61/3.91 Low Water (displace): id=3270, wt=39.000 3.61/3.91 3.61/3.91 Low Water (displace): id=3229, wt=38.000 3.61/3.91 3.61/3.91 Low Water (displace): id=3277, wt=37.000 3.61/3.91 3.61/3.91 Low Water (displace): id=3280, wt=35.000 3.61/3.91 3.61/3.91 Low Water (displace): id=10666, wt=14.000 3.61/3.91 3.61/3.91 Low Water (displace): id=11360, wt=13.000 3.61/3.91 3.61/3.91 Low Water (displace): id=11394, wt=12.000 3.61/3.91 3.61/3.91 Low Water (displace): id=11422, wt=11.000 3.61/3.91 3.61/3.91 Low Water (displace): id=11616, wt=10.000 3.61/3.91 3.61/3.91 NOTE: Back_subsumption disabled, ratio of kept to back_subsumed is 117 (0.00 of 1.56 sec). 3.61/3.91 3.61/3.91 ============================== PROOF ================================= 3.61/3.91 % SZS status Theorem 3.61/3.91 % SZS output start Refutation 3.61/3.91 3.61/3.91 % Proof 1 at 2.80 (+ 0.13) seconds. 3.61/3.91 % Length of proof is 56. 3.61/3.91 % Level of proof is 21. 3.61/3.91 % Maximum clause weight is 16.000. 3.61/3.91 % Given clauses 770. 3.61/3.91 3.61/3.91 5 (all X all Y (is_a_theorem(implies(X,Y)) & is_a_theorem(X) -> is_a_theorem(Y))) <-> modus_ponens # label(modus_ponens) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 3.61/3.91 6 (all P all Q is_a_theorem(implies(P,implies(not(P),Q)))) <-> cn2 # label(cn2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 3.61/3.91 14 kn3 <-> (all P all Q all R is_a_theorem(implies(implies(P,Q),implies(not(and(Q,R)),not(and(R,P)))))) # label(kn3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 3.61/3.91 15 kn1 <-> (all P is_a_theorem(implies(P,and(P,P)))) # label(kn1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 3.61/3.91 20 (all P all Q is_a_theorem(implies(and(P,Q),P))) <-> kn2 # label(kn2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 3.61/3.91 28 op_implies_and -> (all X all Y implies(X,Y) = not(and(X,not(Y)))) # label(op_implies_and) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 3.61/3.91 33 op_implies_and # label(rosser_op_implies_and) # label(axiom). [assumption]. 3.61/3.91 34 modus_ponens # label(rosser_modus_ponens) # label(axiom). [assumption]. 3.61/3.91 36 kn1 # label(rosser_kn1) # label(axiom). [assumption]. 3.61/3.91 37 kn2 # label(rosser_kn2) # label(axiom). [assumption]. 3.61/3.91 38 kn3 # label(rosser_kn3) # label(axiom). [assumption]. 3.61/3.91 41 -cn2 # label(luka_cn2) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption]. 3.61/3.91 48 -kn1 | is_a_theorem(implies(A,and(A,A))) # label(kn1) # label(axiom). [clausify(15)]. 3.61/3.91 49 is_a_theorem(implies(A,and(A,A))). [copy(48),unit_del(a,36)]. 3.61/3.91 55 is_a_theorem(implies(and(A,B),A)) | -kn2 # label(kn2) # label(axiom). [clausify(20)]. 3.61/3.91 56 is_a_theorem(implies(and(A,B),A)). [copy(55),unit_del(b,37)]. 3.61/3.91 61 -is_a_theorem(implies(c13,implies(not(c13),c14))) | cn2 # label(cn2) # label(axiom). [clausify(6)]. 3.61/3.91 62 -is_a_theorem(implies(c13,implies(not(c13),c14))). [copy(61),unit_del(b,41)]. 3.61/3.91 67 -is_a_theorem(implies(A,B)) | -is_a_theorem(A) | is_a_theorem(B) | -modus_ponens # label(modus_ponens) # label(axiom). [clausify(5)]. 3.61/3.91 68 -is_a_theorem(implies(A,B)) | -is_a_theorem(A) | is_a_theorem(B). [copy(67),unit_del(d,34)]. 3.61/3.91 78 -op_implies_and | not(and(A,not(B))) = implies(A,B) # label(op_implies_and) # label(axiom). [clausify(28)]. 3.61/3.91 79 not(and(A,not(B))) = implies(A,B). [copy(78),unit_del(a,33)]. 3.61/3.91 104 -kn3 | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(not(and(B,C)),not(and(C,A))))) # label(kn3) # label(axiom). [clausify(14)]. 3.61/3.91 105 is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(not(and(B,C)),not(and(C,A))))). [copy(104),unit_del(a,38)]. 3.61/3.91 132 -is_a_theorem(implies(A,B)) | is_a_theorem(implies(not(and(B,C)),not(and(C,A)))). [resolve(105,a,68,a)]. 3.61/3.91 275 is_a_theorem(implies(not(and(A,B)),not(and(B,and(A,C))))). [resolve(132,a,56,a)]. 3.61/3.91 276 is_a_theorem(implies(not(and(and(A,A),B)),not(and(B,A)))). [resolve(132,a,49,a)]. 3.61/3.91 280 -is_a_theorem(not(and(A,B))) | is_a_theorem(not(and(B,and(A,C)))). [resolve(275,a,68,a)]. 3.61/3.91 357 -is_a_theorem(not(and(and(A,A),B))) | is_a_theorem(not(and(B,A))). [resolve(276,a,68,a)]. 3.61/3.91 407 -is_a_theorem(implies(and(A,A),B)) | is_a_theorem(not(and(not(B),A))). [para(79(a,1),357(a,1))]. 3.61/3.91 703 is_a_theorem(not(and(not(A),A))). [resolve(407,a,56,a)]. 3.61/3.91 706 is_a_theorem(not(and(A,and(not(A),B)))). [resolve(703,a,280,a)]. 3.61/3.91 736 is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(A)),A)). [para(79(a,1),703(a,1))]. 3.61/3.91 739 is_a_theorem(implies(not(and(A,B)),implies(B,not(A)))). [resolve(736,a,132,a),rewrite([79(6)])]. 3.61/3.91 741 -is_a_theorem(not(not(A))) | is_a_theorem(A). [resolve(736,a,68,a)]. 3.61/3.91 918 is_a_theorem(not(and(and(not(A),B),and(A,C)))). [resolve(706,a,280,a)]. 3.61/3.91 1173 -is_a_theorem(not(and(A,B))) | is_a_theorem(implies(B,not(A))). [resolve(739,a,68,a)]. 3.61/3.91 1779 is_a_theorem(implies(and(A,B),not(and(not(A),C)))). [resolve(1173,a,918,a)]. 3.61/3.91 1786 -is_a_theorem(implies(A,B)) | is_a_theorem(implies(not(B),not(A))). [para(79(a,1),1173(a,1))]. 3.61/3.91 2675 is_a_theorem(implies(and(A,B),implies(not(A),C))). [para(79(a,1),1779(a,1,2))]. 3.61/3.91 2679 is_a_theorem(not(and(not(implies(not(A),B)),A))). [resolve(2675,a,407,a)]. 3.61/3.91 3021 -is_a_theorem(implies(not(and(not(implies(not(A),B)),A)),implies(c13,implies(not(c13),c14)))). [ur(68,b,2679,a,c,62,a)]. 3.61/3.91 4884 is_a_theorem(implies(not(A),not(and(A,B)))). [resolve(1786,a,56,a)]. 3.61/3.91 4885 is_a_theorem(implies(not(and(A,A)),not(A))). [resolve(1786,a,49,a)]. 3.61/3.91 4965 is_a_theorem(implies(not(A),implies(A,B))). [para(79(a,1),4884(a,1,2))]. 3.61/3.91 4972 is_a_theorem(implies(not(and(implies(A,B),C)),implies(C,A))). [resolve(4965,a,132,a),rewrite([79(6)])]. 3.61/3.91 5389 -is_a_theorem(not(and(A,A))) | is_a_theorem(not(A)). [resolve(4885,a,68,a)]. 3.61/3.91 5492 -is_a_theorem(implies(not(A),A)) | is_a_theorem(not(not(A))). [para(79(a,1),5389(a,1))]. 3.61/3.91 11508 -is_a_theorem(not(and(implies(A,B),C))) | is_a_theorem(implies(C,A)). [resolve(4972,a,68,a)]. 3.61/3.91 11527 is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),C),implies(not(C),A))). [para(79(a,1),4972(a,1,1))]. 3.61/3.91 13796 -is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),C)) | is_a_theorem(implies(not(C),A)). [para(79(a,1),11508(a,1))]. 3.61/3.91 14826 is_a_theorem(implies(not(implies(not(A),B)),implies(B,C))). [resolve(13796,a,11527,a)]. 3.61/3.91 15595 is_a_theorem(not(not(implies(not(A),not(A))))). [resolve(14826,a,5492,a)]. 3.61/3.91 15626 is_a_theorem(implies(not(A),not(A))). [resolve(15595,a,741,a)]. 3.61/3.91 15653 is_a_theorem(implies(not(and(not(A),B)),implies(B,A))). [resolve(15626,a,132,a),rewrite([79(6)])]. 3.61/3.91 15654 $F. [resolve(15653,a,3021,a)]. 3.61/3.91 3.61/3.91 % SZS output end Refutation 3.61/3.91 ============================== end of proof ========================== 3.61/3.91 3.61/3.91 ============================== STATISTICS ============================ 3.61/3.91 3.61/3.91 Given=770. Generated=140501. Kept=15604. proofs=1. 3.61/3.91 Usable=765. Sos=9999. Demods=5. Limbo=9, Disabled=4902. Hints=0. 3.61/3.91 Megabytes=13.77. 3.61/3.91 User_CPU=2.80, System_CPU=0.13, Wall_clock=2. 3.61/3.91 3.61/3.91 ============================== end of statistics ===================== 3.61/3.91 3.61/3.91 ============================== end of search ========================= 3.61/3.91 3.61/3.91 THEOREM PROVED 3.61/3.91 % SZS status Theorem 3.61/3.91 3.61/3.91 Exiting with 1 proof. 3.61/3.91 3.61/3.91 Process 14902 exit (max_proofs) Tue Jul 13 16:13:36 2021 3.61/3.91 Prover9 interrupted 3.61/3.91 EOF