0.12/0.13 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.12/0.13 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 1200 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Jul 13 16:17:55 EDT 2021 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime : 0.50/1.07 ============================== Prover9 =============================== 0.50/1.07 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009. 0.50/1.07 Process 21062 was started by sandbox2 on n029.cluster.edu, 0.50/1.07 Tue Jul 13 16:17:55 2021 0.50/1.07 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 1200 -f /tmp/Prover9_20909_n029.cluster.edu". 0.50/1.07 ============================== end of head =========================== 0.50/1.07 0.50/1.07 ============================== INPUT ================================= 0.50/1.07 0.50/1.07 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_20909_n029.cluster.edu 0.50/1.07 0.50/1.07 set(prolog_style_variables). 0.50/1.07 set(auto2). 0.50/1.07 % set(auto2) -> set(auto). 0.50/1.07 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference). 0.50/1.07 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup). 0.50/1.07 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim). 0.50/1.07 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold). 0.50/1.07 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits). 0.50/1.07 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000"). 0.50/1.07 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000). 0.50/1.07 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials). 0.50/1.07 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process). 0.50/1.07 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1). 0.50/1.07 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3). 0.50/1.07 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000"). 0.50/1.07 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1). 0.50/1.07 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600). 0.50/1.07 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0). 0.50/1.07 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5). 0.50/1.07 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300). 0.50/1.07 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos). 0.50/1.07 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1). 0.50/1.07 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000). 0.50/1.07 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400). 0.50/1.07 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some). 0.50/1.07 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input). 0.50/1.07 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet). 0.50/1.07 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses). 0.50/1.07 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given). 0.50/1.07 assign(lrs_ticks,-1). 0.50/1.07 assign(sos_limit,10000). 0.50/1.07 assign(order,kbo). 0.50/1.07 set(lex_order_vars). 0.50/1.07 clear(print_given). 0.50/1.07 0.50/1.07 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (17 formulas) 0.50/1.07 0.50/1.07 ============================== end of input ========================== 0.50/1.07 0.50/1.07 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 1200). 0.50/1.07 0.50/1.07 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ========== 0.50/1.07 0.50/1.07 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses: 0.50/1.07 1 (all A multiplication(A,zero) = zero) # label(right_annihilation) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.50/1.07 2 (all A A = multiplication(A,one)) # label(multiplicative_right_identity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.50/1.07 3 (all A all B all C addition(multiplication(A,C),multiplication(B,C)) = multiplication(addition(A,B),C)) # label(left_distributivity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.50/1.07 4 (all A zero = multiplication(zero,A)) # label(left_annihilation) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.50/1.07 5 (all A addition(A,A) = A) # label(additive_idempotence) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.50/1.07 6 (all A leq(addition(one,multiplication(A,star(A))),star(A))) # label(star_unfold_right) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.50/1.07 7 (all C all B all A addition(A,addition(B,C)) = addition(addition(A,B),C)) # label(additive_associativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.50/1.07 8 (all A all B all C multiplication(multiplication(A,B),C) = multiplication(A,multiplication(B,C))) # label(multiplicative_associativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.50/1.07 9 (all A addition(A,zero) = A) # label(additive_identity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.50/1.07 10 (all A all B all C (leq(addition(multiplication(A,B),C),A) -> leq(multiplication(C,star(B)),A))) # label(star_induction_right) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.50/1.07 11 (all A multiplication(one,A) = A) # label(multiplicative_left_identity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.50/1.07 12 (all A all B addition(A,B) = addition(B,A)) # label(additive_commutativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.50/1.07 13 (all A all B all C (leq(addition(multiplication(A,B),C),B) -> leq(multiplication(star(A),C),B))) # label(star_induction_left) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.50/1.07 14 (all A leq(addition(one,multiplication(star(A),A)),star(A))) # label(star_unfold_left) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.96/1.25 15 (all A all B all C addition(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(A,C)) = multiplication(A,addition(B,C))) # label(right_distributivity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.96/1.25 16 (all A all B (B = addition(A,B) <-> leq(A,B))) # label(order) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.96/1.25 0.96/1.25 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas === 0.96/1.25 0.96/1.25 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES =============== 0.96/1.25 0.96/1.25 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION ================= 0.96/1.25 0.96/1.25 ============================== end predicate elimination ============= 0.96/1.25 0.96/1.25 Auto_denials: 0.96/1.25 % copying label a to answer in negative clause 0.96/1.25 0.96/1.25 Term ordering decisions: 0.96/1.25 0.96/1.25 % Assigning unary symbol star kb_weight 0 and highest precedence (8). 0.96/1.25 Function symbol KB weights: zero=1. one=1. a=1. multiplication=1. addition=1. star=0. 0.96/1.25 0.96/1.25 ============================== end of process initial clauses ======== 0.96/1.25 0.96/1.25 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ==================== 0.96/1.25 0.96/1.25 ============================== end of clauses for search ============= 0.96/1.25 0.96/1.25 ============================== SEARCH ================================ 0.96/1.25 0.96/1.25 % Starting search at 0.01 seconds. 0.96/1.25 0.96/1.25 ============================== PROOF ================================= 0.96/1.25 % SZS status Theorem 0.96/1.25 % SZS output start Refutation 0.96/1.25 0.96/1.25 % Proof 1 at 0.19 (+ 0.01) seconds: a. 0.96/1.25 % Length of proof is 44. 0.96/1.25 % Level of proof is 13. 0.96/1.25 % Maximum clause weight is 16.000. 0.96/1.25 % Given clauses 222. 0.96/1.25 0.96/1.25 2 (all A A = multiplication(A,one)) # label(multiplicative_right_identity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.96/1.25 3 (all A all B all C addition(multiplication(A,C),multiplication(B,C)) = multiplication(addition(A,B),C)) # label(left_distributivity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.96/1.25 5 (all A addition(A,A) = A) # label(additive_idempotence) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.96/1.25 6 (all A leq(addition(one,multiplication(A,star(A))),star(A))) # label(star_unfold_right) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.96/1.25 7 (all C all B all A addition(A,addition(B,C)) = addition(addition(A,B),C)) # label(additive_associativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.96/1.25 12 (all A all B addition(A,B) = addition(B,A)) # label(additive_commutativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.96/1.25 14 (all A leq(addition(one,multiplication(star(A),A)),star(A))) # label(star_unfold_left) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.96/1.25 15 (all A all B all C addition(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(A,C)) = multiplication(A,addition(B,C))) # label(right_distributivity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.96/1.25 16 (all A all B (B = addition(A,B) <-> leq(A,B))) # label(order) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.96/1.25 18 multiplication(A,one) = A # label(multiplicative_right_identity) # label(axiom). [clausify(2)]. 0.96/1.25 20 addition(A,A) = A # label(additive_idempotence) # label(axiom). [clausify(5)]. 0.96/1.25 23 addition(A,B) = addition(B,A) # label(additive_commutativity) # label(axiom). [clausify(12)]. 0.96/1.25 24 leq(addition(one,multiplication(A,star(A))),star(A)) # label(star_unfold_right) # label(axiom). [clausify(6)]. 0.96/1.25 25 leq(addition(one,multiplication(star(A),A)),star(A)) # label(star_unfold_left) # label(axiom). [clausify(14)]. 0.96/1.25 26 addition(addition(A,B),C) = addition(A,addition(B,C)) # label(additive_associativity) # label(axiom). [clausify(7)]. 0.96/1.25 27 addition(A,addition(B,C)) = addition(C,addition(A,B)). [copy(26),rewrite([23(2)]),flip(a)]. 0.96/1.25 29 addition(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(C,B)) = multiplication(addition(A,C),B) # label(left_distributivity) # label(axiom). [clausify(3)]. 0.96/1.25 30 addition(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(A,C)) = multiplication(A,addition(B,C)) # label(right_distributivity) # label(axiom). [clausify(15)]. 0.96/1.25 31 -leq(multiplication(a,a),star(a)) # label(a) # label(negated_conjecture) # answer(a). [assumption]. 0.96/1.25 32 addition(A,B) != B | leq(A,B) # label(order) # label(axiom). [clausify(16)]. 0.96/1.25 33 addition(A,B) = B | -leq(A,B) # label(order) # label(axiom). [clausify(16)]. 0.96/1.25 40 addition(A,addition(A,B)) = addition(A,B). [para(27(a,1),20(a,1)),rewrite([23(1),23(2),27(2,R),20(1),23(3)])]. 0.96/1.25 46 addition(A,multiplication(A,B)) = multiplication(A,addition(B,one)). [para(18(a,1),30(a,1,1)),rewrite([23(4)])]. 0.96/1.25 52 addition(A,addition(B,C)) != addition(A,C) | leq(B,addition(A,C)). [para(27(a,1),32(a,1)),rewrite([23(3),23(5)])]. 0.96/1.25 53 addition(A,addition(B,C)) != addition(A,B) | leq(C,addition(A,B)). [para(27(a,2),32(a,1))]. 0.96/1.25 56 addition(star(A),addition(one,multiplication(star(A),A))) = star(A). [hyper(33,b,25,a),rewrite([23(6)])]. 0.96/1.25 57 addition(star(A),addition(one,multiplication(A,star(A)))) = star(A). [hyper(33,b,24,a),rewrite([23(6)])]. 0.96/1.25 197 leq(A,addition(B,A)). [para(20(a,1),52(a,1,2)),xx(a)]. 0.96/1.25 203 leq(A,addition(B,addition(A,C))). [para(40(a,1),52(a,1,2)),xx(a)]. 0.96/1.25 210 leq(addition(A,B),addition(A,addition(B,C))). [para(27(a,1),197(a,2)),rewrite([23(2),27(3,R),23(2)])]. 0.96/1.25 212 leq(multiplication(A,B),addition(C,multiplication(addition(A,D),B))). [para(29(a,1),203(a,2,2))]. 0.96/1.25 216 leq(A,addition(B,multiplication(A,addition(C,one)))). [para(46(a,1),203(a,2,2))]. 0.96/1.25 291 addition(star(A),one) != star(A) | leq(multiplication(star(A),A),addition(star(A),one)). [para(56(a,1),53(a,1)),flip(a)]. 0.96/1.25 292 leq(addition(star(A),one),star(A)). [para(56(a,1),210(a,2))]. 0.96/1.25 296 addition(star(A),one) = star(A). [hyper(33,b,292,a),rewrite([23(5),40(5)])]. 0.96/1.25 297 leq(multiplication(star(A),A),star(A)). [back_rewrite(291),rewrite([296(3),296(8)]),xx(a)]. 0.96/1.25 309 addition(star(A),multiplication(A,star(A))) = star(A). [para(57(a,1),27(a,1)),rewrite([296(6),23(5)]),flip(a)]. 0.96/1.25 321 leq(A,addition(B,multiplication(A,star(C)))). [para(296(a,1),216(a,2,2,2))]. 0.96/1.25 327 addition(star(A),multiplication(star(A),A)) = star(A). [hyper(33,b,297,a),rewrite([23(4)])]. 0.96/1.25 488 leq(A,star(A)). [para(309(a,1),321(a,2))]. 0.96/1.25 493 addition(A,star(A)) = star(A). [hyper(33,b,488,a)]. 0.96/1.25 1741 leq(multiplication(A,B),addition(C,multiplication(star(A),B))). [para(493(a,1),212(a,2,2,1))]. 0.96/1.25 1770 leq(multiplication(A,A),star(A)). [para(327(a,1),1741(a,2))]. 0.96/1.25 1771 $F # answer(a). [resolve(1770,a,31,a)]. 0.96/1.25 0.96/1.25 % SZS output end Refutation 0.96/1.25 ============================== end of proof ========================== 0.96/1.25 0.96/1.25 ============================== STATISTICS ============================ 0.96/1.25 0.96/1.25 Given=222. Generated=5540. Kept=1751. proofs=1. 0.96/1.25 Usable=195. Sos=1430. Demods=213. Limbo=8, Disabled=135. Hints=0. 0.96/1.25 Megabytes=1.67. 0.96/1.25 User_CPU=0.19, System_CPU=0.01, Wall_clock=1. 0.96/1.25 0.96/1.25 ============================== end of statistics ===================== 0.96/1.25 0.96/1.25 ============================== end of search ========================= 0.96/1.25 0.96/1.25 THEOREM PROVED 0.96/1.25 % SZS status Theorem 0.96/1.25 0.96/1.25 Exiting with 1 proof. 0.96/1.25 0.96/1.25 Process 21062 exit (max_proofs) Tue Jul 13 16:17:56 2021 0.96/1.25 Prover9 interrupted 0.96/1.26 EOF