0.08/0.13 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.08/0.14 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 1200 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Jul 13 16:13:26 EDT 2021 0.13/0.36 % CPUTime : 0.79/1.06 ============================== Prover9 =============================== 0.79/1.06 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009. 0.79/1.06 Process 4663 was started by sandbox2 on n021.cluster.edu, 0.79/1.06 Tue Jul 13 16:13:26 2021 0.79/1.06 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 1200 -f /tmp/Prover9_4509_n021.cluster.edu". 0.79/1.06 ============================== end of head =========================== 0.79/1.06 0.79/1.06 ============================== INPUT ================================= 0.79/1.06 0.79/1.06 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_4509_n021.cluster.edu 0.79/1.06 0.79/1.06 set(prolog_style_variables). 0.79/1.06 set(auto2). 0.79/1.06 % set(auto2) -> set(auto). 0.79/1.06 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference). 0.79/1.06 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup). 0.79/1.06 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim). 0.79/1.06 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold). 0.79/1.06 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits). 0.79/1.06 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000"). 0.79/1.06 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000). 0.79/1.06 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials). 0.79/1.06 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process). 0.79/1.06 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1). 0.79/1.06 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3). 0.79/1.06 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000"). 0.79/1.06 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1). 0.79/1.06 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600). 0.79/1.06 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0). 0.79/1.06 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5). 0.79/1.06 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300). 0.79/1.06 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos). 0.79/1.06 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1). 0.79/1.06 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000). 0.79/1.06 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400). 0.79/1.06 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some). 0.79/1.06 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input). 0.79/1.06 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet). 0.79/1.06 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses). 0.79/1.06 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given). 0.79/1.06 assign(lrs_ticks,-1). 0.79/1.06 assign(sos_limit,10000). 0.79/1.06 assign(order,kbo). 0.79/1.06 set(lex_order_vars). 0.79/1.06 clear(print_given). 0.79/1.06 0.79/1.06 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (18 formulas) 0.79/1.06 0.79/1.06 ============================== end of input ========================== 0.79/1.06 0.79/1.06 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 1200). 0.79/1.06 0.79/1.06 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ========== 0.79/1.06 0.79/1.06 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses: 0.79/1.06 1 (all A multiplication(A,one) = A) # label(multiplicative_right_identity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.79/1.06 2 (all C all B all A addition(addition(A,B),C) = addition(A,addition(B,C))) # label(additive_associativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.79/1.06 3 (all A all B all C addition(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(A,C)) = multiplication(A,addition(B,C))) # label(right_distributivity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.79/1.06 4 (all A multiplication(one,A) = A) # label(multiplicative_left_identity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.79/1.06 5 (all A addition(A,zero) = A) # label(additive_identity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.79/1.06 6 (all A multiplication(A,zero) = zero) # label(right_annihilation) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.79/1.06 7 (all A all B all C addition(multiplication(A,C),multiplication(B,C)) = multiplication(addition(A,B),C)) # label(left_distributivity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.79/1.06 8 (all A all B (B = addition(A,B) <-> leq(A,B))) # label(order) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.79/1.06 9 (all A all B addition(B,A) = addition(A,B)) # label(additive_commutativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.79/1.06 10 (all A all B all C multiplication(A,multiplication(B,C)) = multiplication(multiplication(A,B),C)) # label(multiplicative_associativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.79/1.06 11 (all A zero = multiplication(zero,A)) # label(left_annihilation) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.79/1.06 12 (all A A = addition(A,A)) # label(additive_idempotence) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.79/1.06 13 (all X0 all X1 addition(domain(X0),domain(X1)) = domain(addition(X0,X1))) # label(domain5) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.79/1.06 14 (all X0 multiplication(domain(X0),X0) = addition(X0,multiplication(domain(X0),X0))) # label(domain1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.79/1.07 15 (all X0 all X1 domain(multiplication(X0,X1)) = domain(multiplication(X0,domain(X1)))) # label(domain2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.79/1.07 16 (all X0 addition(domain(X0),one) = one) # label(domain3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.79/1.07 17 -(all X0 all X1 (addition(domain(X0),domain(X1)) = domain(X1) -> addition(X0,multiplication(domain(X1),X0)) = multiplication(domain(X1),X0))) # label(goals) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.79/1.07 0.79/1.07 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas === 0.79/1.07 0.79/1.07 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES =============== 0.79/1.07 0.79/1.07 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION ================= 0.79/1.07 18 addition(A,B) = B | -leq(A,B) # label(order) # label(axiom). [clausify(8)]. 0.79/1.07 19 addition(A,B) != B | leq(A,B) # label(order) # label(axiom). [clausify(8)]. 0.79/1.07 0.79/1.07 ============================== end predicate elimination ============= 0.79/1.07 0.79/1.07 Auto_denials: 0.79/1.07 % copying label goals to answer in negative clause 0.79/1.07 0.79/1.07 Term ordering decisions: 0.79/1.07 0.79/1.07 % Assigning unary symbol domain kb_weight 0 and highest precedence (8). 0.79/1.07 Function symbol KB weights: zero=1. one=1. c1=1. c2=1. multiplication=1. addition=1. domain=0. 0.79/1.07 0.79/1.07 ============================== end of process initial clauses ======== 0.79/1.07 0.79/1.07 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ==================== 0.79/1.07 0.79/1.07 ============================== end of clauses for search ============= 0.79/1.07 0.79/1.07 ============================== SEARCH ================================ 0.79/1.07 0.79/1.07 % Starting search at 0.01 seconds. 0.79/1.07 0.79/1.07 ============================== PROOF ================================= 0.79/1.07 % SZS status Theorem 0.79/1.07 % SZS output start Refutation 0.79/1.07 0.79/1.07 % Proof 1 at 0.03 (+ 0.00) seconds: goals. 0.79/1.07 % Length of proof is 23. 0.79/1.07 % Level of proof is 7. 0.79/1.07 % Maximum clause weight is 13.000. 0.79/1.07 % Given clauses 31. 0.79/1.07 0.79/1.07 4 (all A multiplication(one,A) = A) # label(multiplicative_left_identity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.79/1.07 7 (all A all B all C addition(multiplication(A,C),multiplication(B,C)) = multiplication(addition(A,B),C)) # label(left_distributivity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.79/1.07 9 (all A all B addition(B,A) = addition(A,B)) # label(additive_commutativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.79/1.07 14 (all X0 multiplication(domain(X0),X0) = addition(X0,multiplication(domain(X0),X0))) # label(domain1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.79/1.07 16 (all X0 addition(domain(X0),one) = one) # label(domain3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.79/1.07 17 -(all X0 all X1 (addition(domain(X0),domain(X1)) = domain(X1) -> addition(X0,multiplication(domain(X1),X0)) = multiplication(domain(X1),X0))) # label(goals) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.79/1.07 22 multiplication(one,A) = A # label(multiplicative_left_identity) # label(axiom). [clausify(4)]. 0.79/1.07 27 addition(domain(A),one) = one # label(domain3) # label(axiom). [clausify(16)]. 0.79/1.07 28 addition(A,B) = addition(B,A) # label(additive_commutativity) # label(axiom). [clausify(9)]. 0.79/1.07 29 domain(c2) = addition(domain(c1),domain(c2)) # label(goals) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(17)]. 0.79/1.07 30 addition(domain(c1),domain(c2)) = domain(c2). [copy(29),flip(a)]. 0.79/1.07 36 addition(A,multiplication(domain(A),A)) = multiplication(domain(A),A) # label(domain1) # label(axiom). [clausify(14)]. 0.79/1.07 38 addition(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(C,B)) = multiplication(addition(A,C),B) # label(left_distributivity) # label(axiom). [clausify(7)]. 0.79/1.07 39 addition(c1,multiplication(domain(c2),c1)) != multiplication(domain(c2),c1) # label(goals) # label(negated_conjecture) # answer(goals). [clausify(17)]. 0.79/1.07 41 addition(one,domain(A)) = one. [para(28(a,1),27(a,1))]. 0.79/1.07 61 addition(A,multiplication(B,A)) = multiplication(addition(B,one),A). [para(22(a,1),38(a,1,1)),rewrite([28(4)])]. 0.79/1.07 62 addition(A,multiplication(domain(B),A)) = A. [para(27(a,1),38(a,2,1)),rewrite([22(4),28(3),22(5)])]. 0.79/1.07 69 multiplication(domain(c2),c1) != c1 # answer(goals). [back_rewrite(39),rewrite([61(6),28(4),41(4),22(3)]),flip(a)]. 0.79/1.07 70 multiplication(domain(A),A) = A. [back_rewrite(36),rewrite([62(3)]),flip(a)]. 0.79/1.07 72 addition(A,multiplication(B,A)) = multiplication(addition(B,domain(A)),A). [para(70(a,1),38(a,1,1)),rewrite([28(4)])]. 0.79/1.07 74 multiplication(addition(domain(A),domain(B)),A) = A. [back_rewrite(62),rewrite([72(3),28(3)])]. 0.79/1.07 89 multiplication(domain(c2),c1) = c1. [para(30(a,1),74(a,1,1))]. 0.79/1.07 90 $F # answer(goals). [resolve(89,a,69,a)]. 0.79/1.07 0.79/1.07 % SZS output end Refutation 0.79/1.07 ============================== end of proof ========================== 0.79/1.07 0.79/1.07 ============================== STATISTICS ============================ 0.79/1.07 0.79/1.07 Given=31. Generated=486. Kept=68. proofs=1. 0.79/1.07 Usable=30. Sos=24. Demods=53. Limbo=1, Disabled=32. Hints=0. 0.79/1.07 Megabytes=0.10. 0.79/1.07 User_CPU=0.03, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0. 0.79/1.07 0.79/1.07 ============================== end of statistics ===================== 0.79/1.07 0.79/1.07 ============================== end of search ========================= 0.79/1.07 0.79/1.07 THEOREM PROVED 0.79/1.07 % SZS status Theorem 0.79/1.07 0.79/1.07 Exiting with 1 proof. 0.79/1.07 0.79/1.07 Process 4663 exit (max_proofs) Tue Jul 13 16:13:26 2021 0.79/1.07 Prover9 interrupted 0.81/1.08 EOF