0.07/0.13 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.13/0.14 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 1200 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 120 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Jul 13 17:01:10 EDT 2021 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime : 0.14/0.38 # No SInE strategy applied 0.14/0.38 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN 0.14/0.38 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn. 0.14/0.38 # 0.14/0.38 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.14/0.38 # Number of axioms: 16 Number of unprocessed: 16 0.14/0.38 # Tableaux proof search. 0.14/0.38 # APR header successfully linked. 0.14/0.38 # Hello from C++ 0.22/0.39 # The folding up rule is enabled... 0.22/0.39 # Local unification is enabled... 0.22/0.39 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... 0.22/0.39 # 16 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification 0.22/0.39 # Creating start rules for all 2 conjectures. 0.22/0.39 # There are 2 start rule candidates: 0.22/0.39 # Found 7 unit axioms. 0.22/0.39 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on. 0.22/0.39 # 2 start rule tableaux created. 0.22/0.39 # 9 extension rule candidate clauses 0.22/0.39 # 7 unit axiom clauses 0.22/0.39 0.22/0.39 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. 0.22/0.39 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 2 0.22/0.39 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. 0.22/0.39 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. 0.22/0.39 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. 0.22/0.39 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. 0.22/0.39 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. 0.22/0.39 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. 0.22/0.39 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. 0.22/0.39 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. 0.22/0.39 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.22/0.39 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.22/0.39 # Begin clausification derivation 0.22/0.39 0.22/0.39 # End clausification derivation 0.22/0.39 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (empty(empty_set))). 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_2, plain, (empty(esk2_0))). 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (unordered_pair(X1,X2)=unordered_pair(X2,X1))). 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_14, negated_conjecture, (esk4_0!=empty_set)). 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_1, plain, (~empty(esk1_0))). 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (~in(X1,empty_set))). 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (~empty(unordered_pair(singleton(X1),unordered_pair(X1,X2))))). 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_13, negated_conjecture, (cartesian_product2(singleton(esk5_0),esk4_0)=empty_set|cartesian_product2(esk4_0,singleton(esk5_0))=empty_set)). 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (X1=empty_set|in(esk3_1(X1),X1))). 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (~in(X1,X2)|~in(X2,X1))). 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (X1=X2|~in(unordered_pair(singleton(X3),unordered_pair(X3,X2)),cartesian_product2(X4,singleton(X1))))). 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (X1=X2|~in(unordered_pair(singleton(X1),unordered_pair(X1,X3)),cartesian_product2(singleton(X2),X4)))). 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (in(X1,X2)|~in(unordered_pair(singleton(X1),unordered_pair(X1,X3)),cartesian_product2(X2,singleton(X4))))). 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (in(X1,X2)|~in(unordered_pair(singleton(X3),unordered_pair(X3,X1)),cartesian_product2(singleton(X4),X2)))). 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (in(unordered_pair(singleton(X1),unordered_pair(X1,X2)),cartesian_product2(X3,singleton(X2)))|~in(X1,X3))). 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (in(unordered_pair(singleton(X1),unordered_pair(X1,X2)),cartesian_product2(singleton(X1),X3))|~in(X2,X3))). 0.22/0.39 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! 0.22/0.39 # Begin printing tableau 0.22/0.39 # Found 4 steps 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_14, negated_conjecture, (esk4_0!=empty_set), inference(start_rule)). 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (esk4_0!=empty_set), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_6])). 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_67, plain, (~in(unordered_pair(singleton(esk4_0),unordered_pair(esk4_0,X12)),cartesian_product2(singleton(empty_set),X11))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_5])). 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_87, plain, (~in(unordered_pair(singleton(unordered_pair(singleton(esk4_0),unordered_pair(esk4_0,X12))),unordered_pair(unordered_pair(singleton(esk4_0),unordered_pair(esk4_0,X12)),X9)),cartesian_product2(cartesian_product2(singleton(empty_set),X11),singleton(X10)))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_87, ...])). 0.22/0.39 # End printing tableau 0.22/0.39 # SZS output end 0.22/0.39 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" 0.22/0.39 # Returning from population with 3 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. 0.22/0.39 # We now have 3 tableaux to operate on 0.22/0.39 # Found closed tableau during pool population. 0.22/0.39 # Proof search is over... 0.22/0.39 # Freeing feature tree 0.22/0.39 EOF