0.06/0.10	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.06/0.11	% Command    : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
0.11/0.30	% Computer   : n015.cluster.edu
0.11/0.30	% Model      : x86_64 x86_64
0.11/0.30	% CPU        : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.11/0.30	% Memory     : 8042.1875MB
0.11/0.30	% OS         : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.11/0.30	% CPULimit   : 1200
0.11/0.30	% WCLimit    : 120
0.11/0.30	% DateTime   : Tue Jul 13 16:54:04 EDT 2021
0.11/0.30	% CPUTime    : 
0.11/0.34	# No SInE strategy applied
0.11/0.34	# Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18C___F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
0.11/0.34	# and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
0.11/0.34	#
0.11/0.34	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.11/0.34	# Number of axioms: 63 Number of unprocessed: 43
0.11/0.34	# Tableaux proof search.
0.11/0.34	# APR header successfully linked.
0.11/0.34	# Hello from C++
0.16/0.34	# The folding up rule is enabled...
0.16/0.34	# Local unification is enabled...
0.16/0.34	# Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
0.16/0.34	# 43 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
0.16/0.34	# Creating start rules for all 3 conjectures.
0.16/0.34	# There are 3 start rule candidates:
0.16/0.34	# Found 9 unit axioms.
0.16/0.34	# Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
0.16/0.34	# 3 start rule tableaux created.
0.16/0.34	# 34 extension rule candidate clauses
0.16/0.34	# 9 unit axiom clauses
0.16/0.34	
0.16/0.34	# Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
0.16/0.34	# There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 3
0.16/0.34	# Returning from population with 10 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
0.16/0.34	# We now have 10 tableaux to operate on
0.16/0.40	# There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
0.16/0.40	# There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
0.16/0.40	# There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
0.16/0.40	# There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
0.16/0.40	# There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
0.16/0.40	# There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
0.16/0.40	# There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
0.16/0.40	# There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
0.16/0.40	# SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.16/0.40	# SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.16/0.40	# Begin clausification derivation
0.16/0.40	
0.16/0.40	# End clausification derivation
0.16/0.40	# Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
0.16/0.40	cnf(i_0_2, negated_conjecture, (subset(identity_relation_of(esk3_0),esk4_0))).
0.16/0.40	cnf(i_0_3, negated_conjecture, (ilf_type(esk4_0,relation_type(esk1_0,esk2_0)))).
0.16/0.40	cnf(i_0_42, plain, (ilf_type(esk13_0,binary_relation_type))).
0.16/0.40	cnf(i_0_35, plain, (ilf_type(X1,set_type))).
0.16/0.40	cnf(i_0_46, plain, (subset(X1,X1))).
0.16/0.40	cnf(i_0_48, plain, (ilf_type(identity_relation_of(X1),binary_relation_type))).
0.16/0.40	cnf(i_0_27, plain, (ilf_type(esk10_1(X1),subset_type(X1)))).
0.16/0.40	cnf(i_0_28, plain, (ilf_type(esk11_2(X1,X2),relation_type(X2,X1)))).
0.16/0.40	cnf(i_0_53, plain, (~empty(power_set(X1)))).
0.16/0.40	cnf(i_0_49, plain, (relation_like(X1)|~empty(X1))).
0.16/0.40	cnf(i_0_1, negated_conjecture, (~subset(esk3_0,domain(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk4_0))|~subset(esk3_0,range(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk4_0)))).
0.16/0.40	cnf(i_0_26, plain, (ilf_type(X1,binary_relation_type)|~relation_like(X1))).
0.16/0.40	cnf(i_0_24, plain, (relation_like(X1)|~ilf_type(X1,binary_relation_type))).
0.16/0.40	cnf(i_0_21, plain, (~empty(X1)|~member(X2,X1))).
0.16/0.40	cnf(i_0_10, plain, (member(esk7_1(X1),X1)|relation_like(X1))).
0.16/0.40	cnf(i_0_22, plain, (empty(X1)|member(esk9_1(X1),X1))).
0.16/0.40	cnf(i_0_30, plain, (empty(X1)|ilf_type(esk12_1(X1),member_type(X1)))).
0.16/0.40	cnf(i_0_57, plain, (subset(X1,X2)|~member(esk14_2(X1,X2),X2))).
0.16/0.40	cnf(i_0_50, plain, (relation_like(X1)|~ilf_type(X1,subset_type(cross_product(X2,X3))))).
0.16/0.40	cnf(i_0_17, plain, (member(X1,power_set(X2))|~member(esk8_2(X1,X2),X2))).
0.16/0.40	cnf(i_0_7, plain, (ilf_type(X1,subset_type(X2))|~ilf_type(X1,member_type(power_set(X2))))).
0.16/0.40	cnf(i_0_9, plain, (relation_like(X1)|ordered_pair(X2,X3)!=esk7_1(X1))).
0.16/0.40	cnf(i_0_34, plain, (X1=X2|~member(ordered_pair(X1,X2),identity_relation_of(X3)))).
0.16/0.40	cnf(i_0_36, plain, (ilf_type(X1,member_type(X2))|~member(X1,X2))).
0.16/0.40	cnf(i_0_58, plain, (member(esk14_2(X1,X2),X1)|subset(X1,X2))).
0.16/0.40	cnf(i_0_37, plain, (empty(X1)|member(X2,X1)|~ilf_type(X2,member_type(X1)))).
0.16/0.40	cnf(i_0_33, plain, (member(X1,X2)|~member(ordered_pair(X1,X3),identity_relation_of(X2)))).
0.16/0.40	cnf(i_0_44, plain, (ilf_type(X1,relation_type(X2,X3))|~ilf_type(X1,subset_type(cross_product(X2,X3))))).
0.16/0.40	cnf(i_0_60, plain, (subset(X1,X2)|~member(ordered_pair(esk15_2(X1,X2),esk16_2(X1,X2)),X2)|~ilf_type(X2,binary_relation_type)|~ilf_type(X1,binary_relation_type))).
0.16/0.40	cnf(i_0_8, plain, (ilf_type(X1,member_type(power_set(X2)))|~ilf_type(X1,subset_type(X2)))).
0.16/0.40	cnf(i_0_29, plain, (range(X1,X2,X3)=range_of(X3)|~ilf_type(X3,relation_type(X1,X2)))).
0.16/0.40	cnf(i_0_18, plain, (member(esk8_2(X1,X2),X1)|member(X1,power_set(X2)))).
0.16/0.40	cnf(i_0_45, plain, (domain(X1,X2,X3)=domain_of(X3)|~ilf_type(X3,relation_type(X1,X2)))).
0.16/0.40	cnf(i_0_56, plain, (member(X1,X2)|~member(X1,X3)|~subset(X3,X2))).
0.16/0.40	cnf(i_0_41, plain, (member(ordered_pair(X1,X1),identity_relation_of(X2))|~member(X1,X2))).
0.16/0.40	cnf(i_0_20, plain, (member(X1,X2)|~member(X3,power_set(X2))|~member(X1,X3))).
0.16/0.40	cnf(i_0_54, plain, (member(X1,range_of(X2))|~member(ordered_pair(X3,X1),X2)|~ilf_type(X2,binary_relation_type))).
0.16/0.40	cnf(i_0_43, plain, (ilf_type(X1,subset_type(cross_product(X2,X3)))|~ilf_type(X1,relation_type(X2,X3)))).
0.16/0.40	cnf(i_0_16, plain, (ilf_type(domain(X1,X2,X3),subset_type(X1))|~ilf_type(X3,relation_type(X1,X2)))).
0.16/0.40	cnf(i_0_31, plain, (ilf_type(range(X1,X2,X3),subset_type(X2))|~ilf_type(X3,relation_type(X1,X2)))).
0.16/0.40	cnf(i_0_13, plain, (ordered_pair(esk5_2(X1,X2),esk6_2(X1,X2))=X2|~member(X2,X1)|~relation_like(X1))).
0.16/0.40	cnf(i_0_55, plain, (member(X1,domain_of(X2))|~member(ordered_pair(X1,X3),X2)|~ilf_type(X2,binary_relation_type))).
0.16/0.40	cnf(i_0_61, plain, (member(ordered_pair(esk15_2(X1,X2),esk16_2(X1,X2)),X1)|subset(X1,X2)|~ilf_type(X2,binary_relation_type)|~ilf_type(X1,binary_relation_type))).
0.16/0.40	# End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
0.16/0.40	# Begin printing tableau
0.16/0.40	# Found 4 steps
0.16/0.40	cnf(i_0_3, negated_conjecture, (ilf_type(esk4_0,relation_type(esk1_0,esk2_0))), inference(start_rule)).
0.16/0.40	cnf(i_0_68, plain, (ilf_type(esk4_0,relation_type(esk1_0,esk2_0))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_43])).
0.16/0.40	cnf(i_0_530, plain, (ilf_type(esk4_0,subset_type(cross_product(esk1_0,esk2_0)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_50])).
0.16/0.40	cnf(i_0_548, plain, (relation_like(esk4_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_548, ...])).
0.16/0.40	# End printing tableau
0.16/0.40	# SZS output end
0.16/0.40	# Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
0.16/0.41	# Child (16106) has found a proof.
0.16/0.41	
0.16/0.41	# Proof search is over...
0.16/0.41	# Freeing feature tree
0.16/0.41	EOF