0.07/0.12	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.07/0.13	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.13/0.34	% Computer   : n013.cluster.edu
0.13/0.34	% Model      : x86_64 x86_64
0.13/0.34	% CPU        : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.13/0.34	% Memory     : 8042.1875MB
0.13/0.34	% OS         : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.13/0.34	% CPULimit   : 1200
0.13/0.34	% WCLimit    : 120
0.13/0.34	% DateTime   : Wed Jul 14 13:54:18 EDT 2021
0.13/0.34	% CPUTime    : 
0.19/0.47	Running first-order theorem proving
0.19/0.47	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --free-numbers --proof-object --auto-schedule --cpu-limit=120 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.19/0.47	# Version: 2.6
0.19/0.47	# No SInE strategy applied
0.19/0.47	# Trying AutoSched0 for 59 seconds
0.51/0.68	# AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y
0.51/0.68	# and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
0.51/0.68	#
0.51/0.68	# Preprocessing time       : 0.044 s
0.51/0.68	
0.51/0.68	# Proof found!
0.51/0.68	# SZS status Theorem
0.51/0.68	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.51/0.68	fof(quaternion_ds1_inuse_0010, conjecture, ((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((use=a_select2(rho_defuse,n1)&a_select2(rho_defuse,n2)=use)&use=a_select2(sigma_defuse,n0))&use=a_select2(sigma_defuse,n1))&use=a_select2(sigma_defuse,n4))&a_select3(u_defuse,n0,n0)=use)&a_select3(u_defuse,n1,n0)=use)&use=a_select2(xinit_defuse,n3))&a_select2(xinit_defuse,n4)=use)&use=a_select2(xinit_defuse,n5))&use=a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n1))&use=a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n4))&a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n5)=use)&a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n0)=use)&leq(pv5,n998))&![X14, X16]:(use=a_select3(z_defuse,X14,X16)<=(((leq(X14,n2)&leq(X16,pred(pv5)))&leq(n0,X16))&leq(n0,X14))))&![X6, X7]:((((leq(X6,n2)&leq(X7,pred(pv5)))&leq(n0,X7))&leq(n0,X6))=>use=a_select3(u_defuse,X6,X7)))&leq(pv5,n0))&leq(n0,pv5))&a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n5)=use)&use=a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n4))&a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n3)=use)&a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n2)=use)&use=a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n1))&a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n3)=use)&use=a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n2))&use=a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n0))&a_select3(u_defuse,n2,n0)=use)&a_select2(sigma_defuse,n5)=use)&a_select2(sigma_defuse,n3)=use)&a_select2(sigma_defuse,n2)=use)&a_select2(rho_defuse,n0)=use)=>![X17, X18]:((((~((n0=X17&X18=pv5))&~((X18=pv5&n2=X17)))&~((pv5=X18&X17=n1)))=>a_select3(z_defuse,X17,X18)=use)<=(((leq(n0,X17)&leq(n0,X18))&leq(X18,pv5))&leq(X17,n2)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', quaternion_ds1_inuse_0010)).
0.51/0.68	fof(finite_domain_0, axiom, ![X1]:(n0=X1<=(leq(n0,X1)&leq(X1,n0))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', finite_domain_0)).
0.51/0.68	fof(finite_domain_2, axiom, ![X1]:((n0=X1|n1=X1|X1=n2)<=(leq(X1,n2)&leq(n0,X1))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', finite_domain_2)).
0.51/0.68	fof(c_0_3, plain, (epred2_0<=>(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((use=a_select2(rho_defuse,n1)&a_select2(rho_defuse,n2)=use)&use=a_select2(sigma_defuse,n0))&use=a_select2(sigma_defuse,n1))&use=a_select2(sigma_defuse,n4))&a_select3(u_defuse,n0,n0)=use)&a_select3(u_defuse,n1,n0)=use)&use=a_select2(xinit_defuse,n3))&a_select2(xinit_defuse,n4)=use)&use=a_select2(xinit_defuse,n5))&use=a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n1))&use=a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n4))&a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n5)=use)&a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n0)=use)&leq(pv5,n998))&![X14, X16]:((((leq(X14,n2)&leq(X16,pred(pv5)))&leq(n0,X16))&leq(n0,X14))=>use=a_select3(z_defuse,X14,X16)))&![X6, X7]:((((leq(X6,n2)&leq(X7,pred(pv5)))&leq(n0,X7))&leq(n0,X6))=>use=a_select3(u_defuse,X6,X7)))&leq(pv5,n0))&leq(n0,pv5))&a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n5)=use)&use=a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n4))&a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n3)=use)&a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n2)=use)&use=a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n1))&a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n3)=use)&use=a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n2))&use=a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n0))&a_select3(u_defuse,n2,n0)=use)&a_select2(sigma_defuse,n5)=use)&a_select2(sigma_defuse,n3)=use)&a_select2(sigma_defuse,n2)=use)&a_select2(rho_defuse,n0)=use)), introduced(definition)).
0.51/0.68	fof(c_0_4, plain, (epred2_0=>(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((use=a_select2(rho_defuse,n1)&a_select2(rho_defuse,n2)=use)&use=a_select2(sigma_defuse,n0))&use=a_select2(sigma_defuse,n1))&use=a_select2(sigma_defuse,n4))&a_select3(u_defuse,n0,n0)=use)&a_select3(u_defuse,n1,n0)=use)&use=a_select2(xinit_defuse,n3))&a_select2(xinit_defuse,n4)=use)&use=a_select2(xinit_defuse,n5))&use=a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n1))&use=a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n4))&a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n5)=use)&a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n0)=use)&leq(pv5,n998))&![X14, X16]:((((leq(X14,n2)&leq(X16,pred(pv5)))&leq(n0,X16))&leq(n0,X14))=>use=a_select3(z_defuse,X14,X16)))&![X6, X7]:((((leq(X6,n2)&leq(X7,pred(pv5)))&leq(n0,X7))&leq(n0,X6))=>use=a_select3(u_defuse,X6,X7)))&leq(pv5,n0))&leq(n0,pv5))&a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n5)=use)&use=a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n4))&a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n3)=use)&a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n2)=use)&use=a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n1))&a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n3)=use)&use=a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n2))&use=a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n0))&a_select3(u_defuse,n2,n0)=use)&a_select2(sigma_defuse,n5)=use)&a_select2(sigma_defuse,n3)=use)&a_select2(sigma_defuse,n2)=use)&a_select2(rho_defuse,n0)=use)), inference(split_equiv,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])).
0.51/0.68	fof(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ~((epred2_0=>![X17, X18]:((((leq(n0,X17)&leq(n0,X18))&leq(X18,pv5))&leq(X17,n2))=>(((~((n0=X17&X18=pv5))&~((X18=pv5&n2=X17)))&~((pv5=X18&X17=n1)))=>a_select3(z_defuse,X17,X18)=use)))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[quaternion_ds1_inuse_0010])]), c_0_3])).
0.51/0.68	fof(c_0_6, plain, ![X1]:((leq(n0,X1)&leq(X1,n0))=>n0=X1), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[finite_domain_0])).
0.51/0.68	fof(c_0_7, plain, ![X375, X376, X377, X378]:((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((use=a_select2(rho_defuse,n1)|~epred2_0)&(a_select2(rho_defuse,n2)=use|~epred2_0))&(use=a_select2(sigma_defuse,n0)|~epred2_0))&(use=a_select2(sigma_defuse,n1)|~epred2_0))&(use=a_select2(sigma_defuse,n4)|~epred2_0))&(a_select3(u_defuse,n0,n0)=use|~epred2_0))&(a_select3(u_defuse,n1,n0)=use|~epred2_0))&(use=a_select2(xinit_defuse,n3)|~epred2_0))&(a_select2(xinit_defuse,n4)=use|~epred2_0))&(use=a_select2(xinit_defuse,n5)|~epred2_0))&(use=a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n1)|~epred2_0))&(use=a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n4)|~epred2_0))&(a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n5)=use|~epred2_0))&(a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n0)=use|~epred2_0))&(leq(pv5,n998)|~epred2_0))&(~leq(X375,n2)|~leq(X376,pred(pv5))|~leq(n0,X376)|~leq(n0,X375)|use=a_select3(z_defuse,X375,X376)|~epred2_0))&(~leq(X377,n2)|~leq(X378,pred(pv5))|~leq(n0,X378)|~leq(n0,X377)|use=a_select3(u_defuse,X377,X378)|~epred2_0))&(leq(pv5,n0)|~epred2_0))&(leq(n0,pv5)|~epred2_0))&(a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n5)=use|~epred2_0))&(use=a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n4)|~epred2_0))&(a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n3)=use|~epred2_0))&(a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n2)=use|~epred2_0))&(use=a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n1)|~epred2_0))&(a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n3)=use|~epred2_0))&(use=a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n2)|~epred2_0))&(use=a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n0)|~epred2_0))&(a_select3(u_defuse,n2,n0)=use|~epred2_0))&(a_select2(sigma_defuse,n5)=use|~epred2_0))&(a_select2(sigma_defuse,n3)=use|~epred2_0))&(a_select2(sigma_defuse,n2)=use|~epred2_0))&(a_select2(rho_defuse,n0)=use|~epred2_0)), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])])).
0.51/0.68	fof(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, (epred2_0&((((leq(n0,esk24_0)&leq(n0,esk25_0))&leq(esk25_0,pv5))&leq(esk24_0,n2))&((((n0!=esk24_0|esk25_0!=pv5)&(esk25_0!=pv5|n2!=esk24_0))&(pv5!=esk25_0|esk24_0!=n1))&a_select3(z_defuse,esk24_0,esk25_0)!=use))), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])).
0.51/0.68	fof(c_0_9, plain, ![X365]:(~leq(n0,X365)|~leq(X365,n0)|n0=X365), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])).
0.51/0.68	cnf(c_0_10, plain, (leq(pv5,n0)|~epred2_0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.51/0.68	cnf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, (epred2_0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.51/0.68	cnf(c_0_12, plain, (leq(n0,pv5)|~epred2_0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.51/0.68	cnf(c_0_13, plain, (n0=X1|~leq(n0,X1)|~leq(X1,n0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.51/0.68	cnf(c_0_14, plain, (leq(pv5,n0)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11])])).
0.51/0.68	cnf(c_0_15, plain, (leq(n0,pv5)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_11])])).
0.51/0.68	fof(c_0_16, plain, ![X1]:((leq(X1,n2)&leq(n0,X1))=>(n0=X1|n1=X1|X1=n2)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[finite_domain_2])).
0.51/0.68	cnf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, (leq(esk25_0,pv5)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.51/0.68	cnf(c_0_18, plain, (pv5=n0), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13, c_0_14]), c_0_15])])).
0.51/0.68	fof(c_0_19, plain, ![X360]:(~leq(X360,n2)|~leq(n0,X360)|(n0=X360|n1=X360|X360=n2)), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])])).
0.51/0.68	cnf(c_0_20, negated_conjecture, (n0!=esk24_0|esk25_0!=pv5), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.51/0.68	cnf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, (leq(esk25_0,n0)), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_18])).
0.51/0.68	cnf(c_0_22, negated_conjecture, (leq(n0,esk25_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.51/0.68	cnf(c_0_23, plain, (n0=X1|n1=X1|X1=n2|~leq(X1,n2)|~leq(n0,X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19])).
0.51/0.68	cnf(c_0_24, negated_conjecture, (leq(esk24_0,n2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.51/0.68	cnf(c_0_25, negated_conjecture, (leq(n0,esk24_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.51/0.68	cnf(c_0_26, negated_conjecture, (esk24_0!=n0|esk25_0!=n0), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20, c_0_18])).
0.51/0.68	cnf(c_0_27, negated_conjecture, (esk25_0=n0), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13, c_0_21]), c_0_22])])).
0.51/0.68	cnf(c_0_28, negated_conjecture, (pv5!=esk25_0|esk24_0!=n1), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.51/0.68	cnf(c_0_29, negated_conjecture, (esk24_0=n2|esk24_0=n0|esk24_0=n1), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23, c_0_24]), c_0_25])])).
0.51/0.68	cnf(c_0_30, negated_conjecture, (esk24_0!=n0), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26, c_0_27])])).
0.51/0.68	cnf(c_0_31, negated_conjecture, (esk24_0!=n1|esk25_0!=n0), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28, c_0_18])).
0.51/0.68	cnf(c_0_32, negated_conjecture, (esk25_0!=pv5|n2!=esk24_0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.51/0.68	cnf(c_0_33, negated_conjecture, (esk24_0=n1|esk24_0=n2), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_29, c_0_30])).
0.51/0.68	cnf(c_0_34, negated_conjecture, (esk24_0!=n1), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31, c_0_27])])).
0.51/0.68	cnf(c_0_35, negated_conjecture, (esk24_0!=n2|esk25_0!=n0), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_32, c_0_18])).
0.51/0.68	cnf(c_0_36, negated_conjecture, (esk24_0=n2), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_33, c_0_34])).
0.51/0.68	cnf(c_0_37, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_35, c_0_27])]), c_0_36])]), ['proof']).
0.51/0.68	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.51/0.68	# Proof object total steps             : 38
0.51/0.68	# Proof object clause steps            : 26
0.51/0.68	# Proof object formula steps           : 12
0.51/0.68	# Proof object conjectures             : 22
0.51/0.68	# Proof object clause conjectures      : 19
0.51/0.68	# Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
0.51/0.68	# Proof object initial clauses used    : 12
0.51/0.68	# Proof object initial formulas used   : 3
0.51/0.68	# Proof object generating inferences   : 3
0.51/0.68	# Proof object simplifying inferences  : 24
0.51/0.68	# Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
0.51/0.68	# Parsed axioms                        : 92
0.51/0.68	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.51/0.68	# Initial clauses                      : 240
0.51/0.68	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
0.51/0.68	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 238
0.51/0.68	# Processed clauses                    : 315
0.51/0.68	# ...of these trivial                  : 1
0.51/0.68	# ...subsumed                          : 15
0.51/0.68	# ...remaining for further processing  : 298
0.51/0.68	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 9
0.51/0.68	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.51/0.68	# Backward-subsumed                    : 2
0.51/0.68	# Backward-rewritten                   : 28
0.51/0.68	# Generated clauses                    : 4581
0.51/0.68	# ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 4537
0.51/0.68	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.51/0.68	# Paramodulations                      : 4561
0.51/0.68	# Factorizations                       : 7
0.51/0.68	# NegExts                              : 0
0.51/0.68	# Equation resolutions                 : 11
0.51/0.68	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.51/0.68	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.51/0.68	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.51/0.68	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.51/0.68	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.51/0.68	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.51/0.68	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.51/0.68	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.51/0.68	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.51/0.68	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.51/0.68	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.51/0.68	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.51/0.68	# Current number of processed clauses  : 265
0.51/0.68	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 92
0.51/0.68	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 5
0.51/0.68	#    Negative unit clauses             : 13
0.51/0.68	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 155
0.51/0.68	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4447
0.51/0.68	# ...number of literals in the above   : 27872
0.51/0.68	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.51/0.68	# Current number of archived clauses   : 34
0.51/0.68	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 18100
0.51/0.68	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1204
0.51/0.68	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 6
0.51/0.68	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2143
0.51/0.68	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.51/0.68	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 23
0.51/0.68	# BW rewrite match successes           : 14
0.51/0.68	# Condensation attempts                : 0
0.51/0.68	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.51/0.68	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 147533
0.51/0.68	
0.51/0.68	# -------------------------------------------------
0.51/0.68	# User time                : 0.190 s
0.51/0.68	# System time              : 0.015 s
0.51/0.68	# Total time               : 0.205 s
0.51/0.68	# Maximum resident set size: 1736 pages
0.51/0.68	EOF
