0.00/0.10	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.11	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.10/0.31	% Computer   : n006.cluster.edu
0.10/0.31	% Model      : x86_64 x86_64
0.10/0.31	% CPU        : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.10/0.31	% Memory     : 8042.1875MB
0.10/0.31	% OS         : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.10/0.31	% CPULimit   : 1200
0.10/0.31	% WCLimit    : 120
0.10/0.31	% DateTime   : Tue Jul 13 16:35:10 EDT 2021
0.10/0.31	% CPUTime    : 
0.16/0.42	Running first-order theorem proving
0.16/0.42	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --free-numbers --proof-object --auto-schedule --cpu-limit=120 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.16/0.42	# Version: 2.6
0.16/0.42	# No SInE strategy applied
0.16/0.42	# Trying AutoSched0 for 59 seconds
0.16/0.52	# AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4b
0.16/0.52	# and selection function SelectCQIPrecW.
0.16/0.52	#
0.16/0.52	# Preprocessing time       : 0.027 s
0.16/0.52	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.16/0.52	
0.16/0.52	# Proof found!
0.16/0.52	# SZS status Theorem
0.16/0.52	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.16/0.52	fof(axiom_3a, axiom, ![X1, X2]:(![X3]:(![X4]:(~(r2(X1,X4))|X4!=X3)|~(r2(X2,X3)))|X2=X1), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax', axiom_3a)).
0.16/0.52	fof(axiom_2, axiom, ![X41]:?[X42]:![X43]:((X42!=X43&~(r2(X41,X43)))|(r2(X41,X43)&X43=X42)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax', axiom_2)).
0.16/0.52	fof(axiom_7a, axiom, ![X38, X39]:(~(r2(X38,X39))|![X40]:(~(r1(X40))|X39!=X40)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax', axiom_7a)).
0.16/0.52	fof(nonzerononetwoexist, conjecture, ?[X35]:(![X24]:(~(r1(X24))|X24!=X35)&![X30]:(![X32]:(![X22]:(~(r2(X22,X32))|~(r1(X22)))|~(r2(X32,X30)))|X30!=X35)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', nonzerononetwoexist)).
0.16/0.52	fof(axiom_1, axiom, ?[X26]:![X27]:((r1(X27)&X26=X27)|(X27!=X26&~(r1(X27)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax', axiom_1)).
0.16/0.52	fof(c_0_5, plain, ![X1, X2]:(![X3]:(![X4]:(~r2(X1,X4)|X4!=X3)|~r2(X2,X3))|X2=X1), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_3a])).
0.16/0.52	fof(c_0_6, plain, ![X41]:?[X42]:![X43]:((X42!=X43&~r2(X41,X43))|(r2(X41,X43)&X43=X42)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_2])).
0.16/0.52	fof(c_0_7, plain, ![X38, X39]:(~r2(X38,X39)|![X40]:(~r1(X40)|X39!=X40)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_7a])).
0.16/0.52	fof(c_0_8, plain, ![X92, X93, X94, X95]:(~r2(X92,X95)|X95!=X94|~r2(X93,X94)|X93=X92), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])).
0.16/0.52	fof(c_0_9, plain, ![X132, X134]:(((r2(X132,X134)|esk20_1(X132)!=X134)&(X134=esk20_1(X132)|esk20_1(X132)!=X134))&((r2(X132,X134)|~r2(X132,X134))&(X134=esk20_1(X132)|~r2(X132,X134)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])).
0.16/0.52	fof(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X35]:(![X24]:(~r1(X24)|X24!=X35)&![X30]:(![X32]:(![X22]:(~r2(X22,X32)|~r1(X22))|~r2(X32,X30))|X30!=X35))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[nonzerononetwoexist])])).
0.16/0.52	fof(c_0_11, plain, ![X129, X130, X131]:(~r2(X129,X130)|(~r1(X131)|X130!=X131)), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])).
0.16/0.52	cnf(c_0_12, plain, (X4=X1|~r2(X1,X2)|X2!=X3|~r2(X4,X3)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.16/0.52	cnf(c_0_13, plain, (r2(X1,X2)|esk20_1(X1)!=X2), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.16/0.52	fof(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ![X135]:(((((r2(esk24_1(X135),esk23_1(X135))|r1(esk21_1(X135)))&(r1(esk24_1(X135))|r1(esk21_1(X135))))&(r2(esk23_1(X135),esk22_1(X135))|r1(esk21_1(X135))))&(esk22_1(X135)=X135|r1(esk21_1(X135))))&((((r2(esk24_1(X135),esk23_1(X135))|esk21_1(X135)=X135)&(r1(esk24_1(X135))|esk21_1(X135)=X135))&(r2(esk23_1(X135),esk22_1(X135))|esk21_1(X135)=X135))&(esk22_1(X135)=X135|esk21_1(X135)=X135))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])])])).
0.16/0.52	cnf(c_0_15, plain, (~r2(X1,X2)|~r1(X3)|X2!=X3), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])).
0.16/0.52	cnf(c_0_16, plain, (X1=X2|~r2(X2,X3)|~r2(X1,X3)), inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])).
0.16/0.52	cnf(c_0_17, plain, (r2(X1,esk20_1(X1))), inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])).
0.16/0.52	cnf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, (r2(esk23_1(X1),esk22_1(X1))|r1(esk21_1(X1))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])).
0.16/0.52	cnf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, (esk22_1(X1)=X1|r1(esk21_1(X1))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])).
0.16/0.52	fof(c_0_20, plain, ?[X26]:![X27]:((r1(X27)&X26=X27)|(X27!=X26&~r1(X27))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_1])).
0.16/0.52	cnf(c_0_21, plain, (~r1(X1)|~r2(X2,X1)), inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_15])).
0.16/0.52	cnf(c_0_22, negated_conjecture, (r2(esk24_1(X1),esk23_1(X1))|r1(esk21_1(X1))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])).
0.16/0.52	cnf(c_0_23, plain, (X1=X2|~r2(X1,esk20_1(X2))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_17])).
0.16/0.52	cnf(c_0_24, negated_conjecture, (r1(esk21_1(X1))|r2(esk23_1(X1),X1)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_19])).
0.16/0.52	fof(c_0_25, plain, ![X118]:(((X118!=esk12_0|r1(X118))&(~r1(X118)|r1(X118)))&((X118!=esk12_0|esk12_0=X118)&(~r1(X118)|esk12_0=X118))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])])])).
0.16/0.52	cnf(c_0_26, negated_conjecture, (r2(esk23_1(X1),esk22_1(X1))|esk21_1(X1)=X1), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])).
0.16/0.52	cnf(c_0_27, negated_conjecture, (esk22_1(X1)=X1|esk21_1(X1)=X1), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])).
0.16/0.52	cnf(c_0_28, negated_conjecture, (r1(esk21_1(X1))|~r1(esk23_1(X1))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_22])).
0.16/0.52	cnf(c_0_29, negated_conjecture, (esk23_1(esk20_1(X1))=X1|r1(esk21_1(esk20_1(X1)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23, c_0_24])).
0.16/0.52	cnf(c_0_30, plain, (r1(X1)|X1!=esk12_0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25])).
0.16/0.52	cnf(c_0_31, negated_conjecture, (r2(esk24_1(X1),esk23_1(X1))|esk21_1(X1)=X1), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])).
0.16/0.52	cnf(c_0_32, negated_conjecture, (esk21_1(X1)=X1|r2(esk23_1(X1),X1)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26, c_0_27])).
0.16/0.52	cnf(c_0_33, negated_conjecture, (r1(esk21_1(esk20_1(X1)))|~r1(X1)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28, c_0_29])).
0.16/0.52	cnf(c_0_34, plain, (r1(esk12_0)), inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_30])).
0.16/0.52	cnf(c_0_35, negated_conjecture, (esk21_1(X1)=X1|~r1(esk23_1(X1))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_31])).
0.16/0.52	cnf(c_0_36, negated_conjecture, (esk21_1(esk20_1(X1))=esk20_1(X1)|esk23_1(esk20_1(X1))=X1), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23, c_0_32])).
0.16/0.52	cnf(c_0_37, plain, (esk12_0=X1|~r1(X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25])).
0.16/0.52	cnf(c_0_38, negated_conjecture, (r1(esk21_1(esk20_1(esk12_0)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33, c_0_34])).
0.16/0.52	cnf(c_0_39, negated_conjecture, (esk21_1(esk20_1(X1))=esk20_1(X1)|~r1(X1)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35, c_0_36])).
0.16/0.52	cnf(c_0_40, negated_conjecture, (esk21_1(esk20_1(esk12_0))=esk12_0), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37, c_0_38])).
0.16/0.52	cnf(c_0_41, plain, (~r1(esk20_1(X1))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_17])).
0.16/0.52	cnf(c_0_42, negated_conjecture, (esk20_1(esk12_0)=esk12_0), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39, c_0_34]), c_0_40])).
0.16/0.52	cnf(c_0_43, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41, c_0_42]), c_0_34])]), ['proof']).
0.16/0.52	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.16/0.52	# Proof object total steps             : 44
0.16/0.52	# Proof object clause steps            : 29
0.16/0.52	# Proof object formula steps           : 15
0.16/0.52	# Proof object conjectures             : 21
0.16/0.52	# Proof object clause conjectures      : 18
0.16/0.52	# Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
0.16/0.52	# Proof object initial clauses used    : 11
0.16/0.52	# Proof object initial formulas used   : 5
0.16/0.52	# Proof object generating inferences   : 14
0.16/0.52	# Proof object simplifying inferences  : 7
0.16/0.52	# Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
0.16/0.52	# Parsed axioms                        : 12
0.16/0.52	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.16/0.52	# Initial clauses                      : 47
0.16/0.52	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 12
0.16/0.52	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 35
0.16/0.52	# Processed clauses                    : 889
0.16/0.52	# ...of these trivial                  : 2
0.16/0.52	# ...subsumed                          : 517
0.16/0.52	# ...remaining for further processing  : 370
0.16/0.52	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 6
0.16/0.52	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.16/0.52	# Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.16/0.52	# Backward-rewritten                   : 25
0.16/0.52	# Generated clauses                    : 7111
0.16/0.52	# ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 4313
0.16/0.52	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.16/0.52	# Paramodulations                      : 7105
0.16/0.52	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.16/0.52	# NegExts                              : 0
0.16/0.52	# Equation resolutions                 : 6
0.16/0.52	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.16/0.52	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.16/0.52	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.16/0.52	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.16/0.52	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.16/0.52	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.16/0.52	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.16/0.52	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.16/0.52	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.16/0.52	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.16/0.52	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.16/0.52	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.16/0.52	# Current number of processed clauses  : 304
0.16/0.52	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 23
0.16/0.52	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.16/0.52	#    Negative unit clauses             : 2
0.16/0.52	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 279
0.16/0.52	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3471
0.16/0.52	# ...number of literals in the above   : 11354
0.16/0.52	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.16/0.52	# Current number of archived clauses   : 64
0.16/0.52	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 17796
0.16/0.52	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 13929
0.16/0.52	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 509
0.16/0.52	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 822
0.16/0.52	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.16/0.52	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 27
0.16/0.52	# BW rewrite match successes           : 13
0.16/0.52	# Condensation attempts                : 0
0.16/0.52	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.16/0.52	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 104689
0.16/0.52	
0.16/0.52	# -------------------------------------------------
0.16/0.52	# User time                : 0.095 s
0.16/0.52	# System time              : 0.006 s
0.16/0.52	# Total time               : 0.101 s
0.16/0.52	# Maximum resident set size: 1640 pages
0.16/0.52	EOF
