0.03/0.12	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.12/0.12	% Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
0.12/0.33	% Computer   : n002.cluster.edu
0.12/0.33	% Model      : x86_64 x86_64
0.12/0.33	% CPU        : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.12/0.33	% Memory     : 8042.1875MB
0.12/0.33	% OS         : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.12/0.33	% CPULimit   : 1200
0.12/0.33	% WCLimit    : 120
0.12/0.33	% DateTime   : Wed Jul 14 14:22:03 EDT 2021
0.12/0.33	% CPUTime    : 
0.18/0.44	openjdk version "1.8.0_171"
0.18/0.44	OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_171-b10)
0.18/0.44	OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.171-b10, mixed mode)
0.18/0.45	file=/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.52/0.64	start to proof: theBenchmark
0.61/0.69	% Version  : CSE_E---1.3
0.61/0.69	% Problem  : theBenchmark.p
0.61/0.69	% Proof found
0.61/0.69	% SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
0.61/0.69	% SZS output start Proof
0.61/0.69	fof(co3, conjecture, ![X1, X2, X3, X4]:(pi_remove(triple(X1,X2,X3),X4)=>((i(remove_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),X4))=remove_pq(i(triple(X1,X2,X3)),X4)&pi_sharp_remove(i(triple(X1,X2,X3)),X4))<=phi(remove_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),X4)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', co3)).
0.61/0.69	fof(main3_li34, lemma, ![X1, X2, X3, X4]:(contains_pq(i(triple(X1,X2,X3)),X4)=>i(remove_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),X4))=remove_pq(i(triple(X1,X2,X3)),X4)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', main3_li34)).
0.61/0.69	fof(ax56, axiom, ![X1, X2]:(pi_sharp_remove(X1,X2)<=>contains_pq(X1,X2)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV007+4.ax', ax56)).
0.61/0.69	fof(ax57, axiom, ![X1, X2]:(pi_remove(X1,X2)<=>pi_sharp_remove(i(X1),X2)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV007+4.ax', ax57)).
0.61/0.69	fof(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ~(![X1, X2, X3, X4]:(pi_remove(triple(X1,X2,X3),X4)=>((i(remove_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),X4))=remove_pq(i(triple(X1,X2,X3)),X4)&pi_sharp_remove(i(triple(X1,X2,X3)),X4))<=phi(remove_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),X4))))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co3])).
0.61/0.69	fof(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, (pi_remove(triple(esk5_0,esk6_0,esk7_0),esk8_0)&(phi(remove_cpq(triple(esk5_0,esk6_0,esk7_0),esk8_0))&(i(remove_cpq(triple(esk5_0,esk6_0,esk7_0),esk8_0))!=remove_pq(i(triple(esk5_0,esk6_0,esk7_0)),esk8_0)|~pi_sharp_remove(i(triple(esk5_0,esk6_0,esk7_0)),esk8_0)))), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])])).
0.61/0.69	fof(c_0_6, lemma, ![X174, X175, X176, X177]:(~contains_pq(i(triple(X174,X175,X176)),X177)|i(remove_cpq(triple(X174,X175,X176),X177))=remove_pq(i(triple(X174,X175,X176)),X177)), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[main3_li34])])).
0.61/0.69	fof(c_0_7, plain, ![X147, X148]:((~pi_sharp_remove(X147,X148)|contains_pq(X147,X148))&(~contains_pq(X147,X148)|pi_sharp_remove(X147,X148))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax56])])).
0.61/0.69	cnf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, (i(remove_cpq(triple(esk5_0,esk6_0,esk7_0),esk8_0))!=remove_pq(i(triple(esk5_0,esk6_0,esk7_0)),esk8_0)|~pi_sharp_remove(i(triple(esk5_0,esk6_0,esk7_0)),esk8_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
0.61/0.69	cnf(c_0_9, lemma, (i(remove_cpq(triple(X1,X2,X3),X4))=remove_pq(i(triple(X1,X2,X3)),X4)|~contains_pq(i(triple(X1,X2,X3)),X4)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.61/0.69	cnf(c_0_10, plain, (contains_pq(X1,X2)|~pi_sharp_remove(X1,X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.61/0.69	fof(c_0_11, plain, ![X164, X165]:((~pi_remove(X164,X165)|pi_sharp_remove(i(X164),X165))&(~pi_sharp_remove(i(X164),X165)|pi_remove(X164,X165))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax57])])).
0.61/0.69	cnf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, (~pi_sharp_remove(i(triple(esk5_0,esk6_0,esk7_0)),esk8_0)), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_9]), c_0_10])).
0.61/0.69	cnf(c_0_13, plain, (pi_sharp_remove(i(X1),X2)|~pi_remove(X1,X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])).
0.61/0.69	cnf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, (pi_remove(triple(esk5_0,esk6_0,esk7_0),esk8_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
0.61/0.69	cnf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_13]), c_0_14])]), ['proof']).
0.61/0.69	% SZS output end Proof
0.61/0.69	% Total time : 0.046000 s
0.61/0.69	
0.61/0.70	EOF