0.00/0.12 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.12/0.12 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 180 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Aug 29 09:23:42 EDT 2019 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime : 0.73/1.02 ============================== Prover9 =============================== 0.73/1.02 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009. 0.73/1.02 Process 14622 was started by sandbox2 on n011.cluster.edu, 0.73/1.02 Thu Aug 29 09:23:43 2019 0.73/1.02 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 180 -f /tmp/Prover9_14468_n011.cluster.edu". 0.73/1.02 ============================== end of head =========================== 0.73/1.02 0.73/1.02 ============================== INPUT ================================= 0.73/1.02 0.73/1.02 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_14468_n011.cluster.edu 0.73/1.02 0.73/1.02 set(prolog_style_variables). 0.73/1.02 set(auto2). 0.73/1.02 % set(auto2) -> set(auto). 0.73/1.02 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference). 0.73/1.02 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup). 0.73/1.02 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim). 0.73/1.02 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold). 0.73/1.02 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits). 0.73/1.02 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000"). 0.73/1.02 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000). 0.73/1.02 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials). 0.73/1.02 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process). 0.73/1.02 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1). 0.73/1.02 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3). 0.73/1.02 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000"). 0.73/1.02 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1). 0.73/1.02 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600). 0.73/1.02 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0). 0.73/1.02 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5). 0.73/1.02 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300). 0.73/1.02 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos). 0.73/1.02 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1). 0.73/1.02 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000). 0.73/1.02 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400). 0.73/1.02 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some). 0.73/1.02 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input). 0.73/1.02 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet). 0.73/1.02 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses). 0.73/1.02 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given). 0.73/1.02 assign(lrs_ticks,-1). 0.73/1.02 assign(sos_limit,10000). 0.73/1.02 assign(order,kbo). 0.73/1.02 set(lex_order_vars). 0.73/1.02 clear(print_given). 0.73/1.02 0.73/1.02 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (89 formulas) 0.73/1.02 0.73/1.02 ============================== end of input ========================== 0.73/1.02 0.73/1.02 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 180). 0.73/1.02 0.73/1.02 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ========== 0.73/1.02 0.73/1.02 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses: 0.73/1.02 1 (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(Y,and(X,Y))))) <-> and_3 # label(and_3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 2 r5 <-> (all P all Q all R is_a_theorem(implies(implies(Q,R),implies(or(P,Q),or(P,R))))) # label(r5) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 3 substitution_of_equivalents <-> (all X all Y (is_a_theorem(equiv(X,Y)) -> X = Y)) # label(substitution_of_equivalents) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 4 (all P all Q all R is_a_theorem(implies(implies(P,Q),implies(not(and(Q,R)),not(and(R,P)))))) <-> kn3 # label(kn3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 5 implies_3 <-> (all X all Y all Z is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,Y),implies(implies(Y,Z),implies(X,Z))))) # label(implies_3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 6 cn1 <-> (all P all Q all R is_a_theorem(implies(implies(P,Q),implies(implies(Q,R),implies(P,R))))) # label(cn1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 7 (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(equiv(X,Y),implies(X,Y)))) <-> equivalence_1 # label(equivalence_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 8 (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,Y),implies(implies(Y,X),equiv(X,Y))))) <-> equivalence_3 # label(equivalence_3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 9 modus_ponens <-> (all X all Y (is_a_theorem(X) & is_a_theorem(implies(X,Y)) -> is_a_theorem(Y))) # label(modus_ponens) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 10 (all P is_a_theorem(implies(P,and(P,P)))) <-> kn1 # label(kn1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 11 (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(and(X,Y),X))) <-> and_1 # label(and_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 12 and_2 <-> (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(and(X,Y),Y))) # label(and_2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 13 (all P is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(P),P),P))) <-> cn3 # label(cn3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 14 or_2 <-> (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(Y,or(X,Y)))) # label(or_2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 15 r3 <-> (all P all Q is_a_theorem(implies(or(P,Q),or(Q,P)))) # label(r3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 16 (all P all Q is_a_theorem(implies(P,implies(not(P),Q)))) <-> cn2 # label(cn2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 17 implies_2 <-> (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,implies(X,Y)),implies(X,Y)))) # label(implies_2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 18 (all P all Q is_a_theorem(implies(Q,or(P,Q)))) <-> r2 # label(r2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 19 (all X all Y all Z is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,Z),implies(implies(Y,Z),implies(or(X,Y),Z))))) <-> or_3 # label(or_3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 20 (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(Y),not(X)),implies(X,Y)))) <-> modus_tollens # label(modus_tollens) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 21 equivalence_2 <-> (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(equiv(X,Y),implies(Y,X)))) # label(equivalence_2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 22 implies_1 <-> (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(Y,X)))) # label(implies_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 23 or_1 <-> (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(X,or(X,Y)))) # label(or_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 24 (all P all Q all R is_a_theorem(implies(or(P,or(Q,R)),or(Q,or(P,R))))) <-> r4 # label(r4) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 25 r1 <-> (all P is_a_theorem(implies(or(P,P),P))) # label(r1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 26 kn2 <-> (all P all Q is_a_theorem(implies(and(P,Q),P))) # label(kn2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 27 op_and -> (all X all Y not(or(not(X),not(Y))) = and(X,Y)) # label(op_and) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 28 op_or -> (all X all Y or(X,Y) = not(and(not(X),not(Y)))) # label(op_or) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 29 op_equiv -> (all X all Y equiv(X,Y) = and(implies(X,Y),implies(Y,X))) # label(op_equiv) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 30 op_implies_or -> (all X all Y implies(X,Y) = or(not(X),Y)) # label(op_implies_or) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 31 op_implies_and -> (all X all Y implies(X,Y) = not(and(X,not(Y)))) # label(op_implies_and) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 32 (all X all Y all Z is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(strict_implies(X,Y),strict_implies(Y,Z)),strict_implies(X,Z)))) <-> axiom_m5 # label(axiom_m5) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 33 (all P all Q is_a_theorem(strict_implies(possibly(and(P,Q)),P))) <-> axiom_m7 # label(axiom_m7) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 34 adjunction <-> (all X all Y (is_a_theorem(X) & is_a_theorem(Y) -> is_a_theorem(and(X,Y)))) # label(adjunction) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 35 axiom_B <-> (all X is_a_theorem(implies(X,necessarily(possibly(X))))) # label(axiom_B) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 36 (all X is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X,possibly(X)))) <-> axiom_m6 # label(axiom_m6) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 37 (all X is_a_theorem(strict_implies(necessarily(X),necessarily(necessarily(X))))) <-> axiom_s4 # label(axiom_s4) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 38 axiom_m1 <-> (all X all Y is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(X,Y),and(Y,X)))) # label(axiom_m1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 39 (all X all Y (is_a_theorem(strict_equiv(X,Y)) -> X = Y)) <-> substitution_strict_equiv # label(substitution_strict_equiv) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 40 axiom_m8 <-> (all P all Q is_a_theorem(strict_implies(strict_implies(P,Q),strict_implies(possibly(P),possibly(Q))))) # label(axiom_m8) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 41 necessitation <-> (all X (is_a_theorem(X) -> is_a_theorem(necessarily(X)))) # label(necessitation) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.06 42 (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(necessarily(implies(X,Y)),implies(necessarily(X),necessarily(Y))))) <-> axiom_K # label(axiom_K) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.06 43 axiom_s1 <-> (all X all Y all Z is_a_theorem(implies(and(necessarily(implies(X,Y)),necessarily(implies(Y,Z))),necessarily(implies(X,Z))))) # label(axiom_s1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.06 44 (all X is_a_theorem(implies(necessarily(X),necessarily(necessarily(X))))) <-> axiom_4 # label(axiom_4) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.06 45 axiom_s2 <-> (all P all Q is_a_theorem(strict_implies(possibly(and(P,Q)),and(possibly(P),possibly(Q))))) # label(axiom_s2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.06 46 (all X is_a_theorem(strict_implies(possibly(X),necessarily(possibly(X))))) <-> axiom_m10 # label(axiom_m10) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.06 47 modus_ponens_strict_implies <-> (all X all Y (is_a_theorem(X) & is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X,Y)) -> is_a_theorem(Y))) # label(modus_ponens_strict_implies) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.06 48 (all X is_a_theorem(strict_implies(possibly(possibly(X)),possibly(X)))) <-> axiom_m9 # label(axiom_m9) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.06 49 (all X is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X,and(X,X)))) <-> axiom_m4 # label(axiom_m4) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.06 50 (all X is_a_theorem(implies(possibly(X),necessarily(possibly(X))))) <-> axiom_5 # label(axiom_5) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.06 51 axiom_M <-> (all X is_a_theorem(implies(necessarily(X),X))) # label(axiom_M) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.06 52 axiom_m2 <-> (all X all Y is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(X,Y),X))) # label(axiom_m2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.06 53 axiom_s3 <-> (all X all Y is_a_theorem(strict_implies(strict_implies(X,Y),strict_implies(not(possibly(Y)),not(possibly(X)))))) # label(axiom_s3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.06 54 axiom_m3 <-> (all X all Y all Z is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(and(X,Y),Z),and(X,and(Y,Z))))) # label(axiom_m3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.06 55 op_necessarily -> (all X necessarily(X) = not(possibly(not(X)))) # label(op_necessarily) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.06 56 op_strict_equiv -> (all X all Y and(strict_implies(X,Y),strict_implies(Y,X)) = strict_equiv(X,Y)) # label(op_strict_equiv) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.06 57 op_strict_implies -> (all X all Y necessarily(implies(X,Y)) = strict_implies(X,Y)) # label(op_strict_implies) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.06 58 op_possibly -> (all X not(necessarily(not(X))) = possibly(X)) # label(op_possibly) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.06 0.73/1.06 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas === 0.73/1.06 0.73/1.06 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES =============== 0.73/1.06 0.73/1.06 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION ================= 0.73/1.06 0.73/1.06 ============================== end predicate elimination ============= 0.73/1.06 0.73/1.06 Auto_denials: (non-Horn, no changes). 0.73/1.06 0.73/1.06 Term ordering decisions: 0.73/1.06 Function symbol KB weights: c1=1. c2=1. c3=1. c4=1. c5=1. c6=1. c7=1. c8=1. c9=1. c10=1. c11=1. c12=1. c13=1. c14=1. c15=1. c16=1. c17=1. c18=1. c19=1. c20=1. c21=1. c22=1. c23=1. c24=1. c25=1. c26=1. c27=1. c28=1. c29=1. c30=1. c31=1. c32=1. c33=1. c34=1. c35=1. c36=1. c37=1. c38=1. c39=1. c40=1. c41=1. c42=1. c43=1. c44=1. c45=1. c46=1. c47=1. c48=1. c49=1. c50=1. c51=1. c52=1. c53=1. c54=1. c55=1. c56=1. c57=1. c58=1. c59=1. c60=1. c61=1. c62=1. c63=1. c64=1. c65=1. c66=1. c67=1. c68=1. c69=1. c70=1. c71=1. c72=1. c73=1. c74=1. c75=1. c76=1. c77=1. c78=1. c79=1. c80=1. c81=1. c82=1. c83=1. c84=1. c85=1. c86=1. c87=1. c88=1. c89=1. c90=1. c91=1. c92=1. c93=1. c94=1. implies=1. and=1. strict_implies=1. or=1. equiv=1. strict_equiv=1. necessarily=1. possibly=1. not=1. 0.73/1.06 0.73/1.06 ============================== end of process initial clauses ======== 0.73/1.06 0.73/1.06 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ==================== 2.75/3.02 2.75/3.02 ============================== end of clauses for search ============= 2.75/3.02 2.75/3.02 ============================== SEARCH ================================ 2.75/3.02 2.75/3.02 % Starting search at 0.05 seconds. 2.75/3.02 2.75/3.02 Low Water (keep): wt=25.000, iters=3398 2.75/3.02 2.75/3.02 Low Water (keep): wt=22.000, iters=3425 2.75/3.02 2.75/3.02 Low Water (keep): wt=21.000, iters=3416 2.75/3.02 2.75/3.02 Low Water (keep): wt=20.000, iters=3383 2.75/3.02 2.75/3.02 Low Water (keep): wt=19.000, iters=3367 2.75/3.02 2.75/3.02 Low Water (keep): wt=17.000, iters=3387 2.75/3.02 2.75/3.02 Low Water (keep): wt=16.000, iters=3338 2.75/3.02 2.75/3.02 Low Water (keep): wt=15.000, iters=3341 2.75/3.02 2.75/3.02 Low Water (keep): wt=14.000, iters=3368 2.75/3.02 2.75/3.02 Low Water (keep): wt=13.000, iters=3363 2.75/3.02 2.75/3.02 NOTE: Back_subsumption disabled, ratio of kept to back_subsumed is 37 (0.00 of 1.94 sec). 2.75/3.02 2.75/3.02 ============================== PROOF ================================= 2.75/3.02 % SZS status Theorem 2.75/3.02 % SZS output start Refutation 2.75/3.02 2.75/3.02 % Proof 1 at 1.99 (+ 0.02) seconds. 2.75/3.02 % Length of proof is 35. 2.75/3.02 % Level of proof is 7. 2.75/3.02 % Maximum clause weight is 12.000. 2.75/3.02 % Given clauses 549. 2.75/3.02 2.75/3.02 9 modus_ponens <-> (all X all Y (is_a_theorem(X) & is_a_theorem(implies(X,Y)) -> is_a_theorem(Y))) # label(modus_ponens) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 2.75/3.02 41 necessitation <-> (all X (is_a_theorem(X) -> is_a_theorem(necessarily(X)))) # label(necessitation) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 2.75/3.02 42 (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(necessarily(implies(X,Y)),implies(necessarily(X),necessarily(Y))))) <-> axiom_K # label(axiom_K) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 2.75/3.02 47 modus_ponens_strict_implies <-> (all X all Y (is_a_theorem(X) & is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X,Y)) -> is_a_theorem(Y))) # label(modus_ponens_strict_implies) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 2.75/3.02 51 axiom_M <-> (all X is_a_theorem(implies(necessarily(X),X))) # label(axiom_M) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 2.75/3.02 57 op_strict_implies -> (all X all Y necessarily(implies(X,Y)) = strict_implies(X,Y)) # label(op_strict_implies) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 2.75/3.02 76 -modus_ponens | -is_a_theorem(A) | -is_a_theorem(implies(A,B)) | is_a_theorem(B) # label(modus_ponens) # label(axiom). [clausify(9)]. 2.75/3.02 128 modus_ponens # label(hilbert_modus_ponens) # label(axiom). [assumption]. 2.75/3.02 159 -necessitation | -is_a_theorem(A) | is_a_theorem(necessarily(A)) # label(necessitation) # label(axiom). [clausify(41)]. 2.75/3.02 163 is_a_theorem(implies(necessarily(implies(A,B)),implies(necessarily(A),necessarily(B)))) | -axiom_K # label(axiom_K) # label(axiom). [clausify(42)]. 2.75/3.02 173 modus_ponens_strict_implies | is_a_theorem(c82) # label(modus_ponens_strict_implies) # label(axiom). [clausify(47)]. 2.75/3.02 174 modus_ponens_strict_implies | is_a_theorem(strict_implies(c82,c83)) # label(modus_ponens_strict_implies) # label(axiom). [clausify(47)]. 2.75/3.02 175 modus_ponens_strict_implies | -is_a_theorem(c83) # label(modus_ponens_strict_implies) # label(axiom). [clausify(47)]. 2.75/3.02 182 -axiom_M | is_a_theorem(implies(necessarily(A),A)) # label(axiom_M) # label(axiom). [clausify(51)]. 2.75/3.02 194 -op_strict_implies | necessarily(implies(A,B)) = strict_implies(A,B) # label(op_strict_implies) # label(axiom). [clausify(57)]. 2.75/3.02 198 axiom_M # label(km4b_axiom_M) # label(axiom). [assumption]. 2.75/3.02 199 necessitation # label(km4b_necessitation) # label(axiom). [assumption]. 2.75/3.02 200 axiom_K # label(km4b_axiom_K) # label(axiom). [assumption]. 2.75/3.02 205 op_strict_implies # label(s1_0_op_strict_implies) # label(axiom). [assumption]. 2.75/3.02 206 -modus_ponens_strict_implies # label(s1_0_modus_ponens_strict_implies) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption]. 2.75/3.02 215 -is_a_theorem(A) | -is_a_theorem(implies(A,B)) | is_a_theorem(B). [back_unit_del(76),unit_del(a,128)]. 2.75/3.02 227 is_a_theorem(implies(necessarily(A),A)). [back_unit_del(182),unit_del(a,198)]. 2.75/3.02 228 -is_a_theorem(A) | is_a_theorem(necessarily(A)). [back_unit_del(159),unit_del(a,199)]. 2.75/3.02 229 is_a_theorem(implies(necessarily(implies(A,B)),implies(necessarily(A),necessarily(B)))). [back_unit_del(163),unit_del(b,200)]. 2.75/3.02 233 necessarily(implies(A,B)) = strict_implies(A,B). [back_unit_del(194),unit_del(a,205)]. 2.75/3.02 234 -is_a_theorem(c83). [back_unit_del(175),unit_del(a,206)]. 2.75/3.02 235 is_a_theorem(strict_implies(c82,c83)). [back_unit_del(174),unit_del(a,206)]. 2.75/3.02 236 is_a_theorem(c82). [back_unit_del(173),unit_del(a,206)]. 2.75/3.02 246 is_a_theorem(implies(strict_implies(A,B),implies(necessarily(A),necessarily(B)))). [back_rewrite(229),rewrite([233(2)])]. 2.75/3.02 325 -is_a_theorem(necessarily(A)) | is_a_theorem(A). [resolve(227,a,215,b)]. 2.75/3.02 365 is_a_theorem(necessarily(c82)). [resolve(236,a,228,a)]. 2.75/3.02 379 -is_a_theorem(strict_implies(A,B)) | is_a_theorem(implies(necessarily(A),necessarily(B))). [resolve(246,a,215,b)]. 2.75/3.02 10141 is_a_theorem(implies(necessarily(c82),necessarily(c83))). [resolve(379,a,235,a)]. 2.75/3.02 10159 is_a_theorem(necessarily(c83)). [resolve(10141,a,215,b),unit_del(a,365)]. 2.75/3.02 10171 $F. [resolve(10159,a,325,a),unit_del(a,234)]. 2.75/3.02 2.75/3.02 % SZS output end Refutation 2.75/3.02 ============================== end of proof ========================== 2.75/3.02 2.75/3.02 ============================== STATISTICS ============================ 2.75/3.02 2.75/3.02 Given=549. Generated=19244. Kept=10108. proofs=1. 2.75/3.02 Usable=535. Sos=9267. Demods=24. Limbo=9, Disabled=444. Hints=0. 2.75/3.02 Megabytes=12.83. 2.75/3.02 User_CPU=1.99, System_CPU=0.02, Wall_clock=2. 2.75/3.02 2.75/3.02 ============================== end of statistics ===================== 2.75/3.02 2.75/3.02 ============================== end of search ========================= 2.75/3.02 2.75/3.02 THEOREM PROVED 2.75/3.02 % SZS status Theorem 2.75/3.02 2.75/3.02 Exiting with 1 proof. 2.75/3.02 2.75/3.02 Process 14622 exit (max_proofs) Thu Aug 29 09:23:45 2019 2.75/3.02 Prover9 interrupted 2.75/3.02 EOF