0.03/0.11 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.03/0.12 % Command : eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule --cpu-limit=%d %s 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 180 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Aug 29 09:10:47 EDT 2019 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : 0.12/0.33 # Version: 2.4_pre003 0.12/0.34 # No SInE strategy applied 0.12/0.34 # Trying AutoSched0 for 90 seconds 0.19/0.39 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI 0.19/0.39 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn. 0.19/0.39 # 0.19/0.39 # Preprocessing time : 0.032 s 0.19/0.39 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.19/0.39 0.19/0.39 # Proof found! 0.19/0.39 # SZS status Theorem 0.19/0.39 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.19/0.39 fof(s1_0_axiom_m4, conjecture, axiom_m4, file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', s1_0_axiom_m4)). 0.19/0.39 fof(necessitation, axiom, (necessitation<=>![X1]:(is_a_theorem(necessarily(X1))<=is_a_theorem(X1))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+0.ax', necessitation)). 0.19/0.39 fof(op_strict_implies, axiom, (![X1, X2]:necessarily(implies(X1,X2))=strict_implies(X1,X2)<=op_strict_implies), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+1.ax', op_strict_implies)). 0.19/0.39 fof(modus_ponens, axiom, (modus_ponens<=>![X1, X2]:((is_a_theorem(X1)&is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)))=>is_a_theorem(X2))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax', modus_ponens)). 0.19/0.39 fof(implies_2, axiom, (implies_2<=>![X1, X2]:is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,implies(X1,X2)),implies(X1,X2)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax', implies_2)). 0.19/0.39 fof(axiom_m4, axiom, (![X1]:is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X1,and(X1,X1)))<=>axiom_m4), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+0.ax', axiom_m4)). 0.19/0.39 fof(km5_necessitation, axiom, necessitation, file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+2.ax', km5_necessitation)). 0.19/0.39 fof(s1_0_op_strict_implies, axiom, op_strict_implies, file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', s1_0_op_strict_implies)). 0.19/0.39 fof(hilbert_modus_ponens, axiom, modus_ponens, file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax', hilbert_modus_ponens)). 0.19/0.39 fof(hilbert_implies_2, axiom, implies_2, file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax', hilbert_implies_2)). 0.19/0.39 fof(and_3, axiom, (![X1, X2]:is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,and(X1,X2))))<=>and_3), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax', and_3)). 0.19/0.39 fof(hilbert_and_3, axiom, and_3, file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax', hilbert_and_3)). 0.19/0.39 fof(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ~(axiom_m4), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[s1_0_axiom_m4])). 0.19/0.39 fof(c_0_13, plain, ![X159]:((~necessitation|(~is_a_theorem(X159)|is_a_theorem(necessarily(X159))))&((is_a_theorem(esk72_0)|necessitation)&(~is_a_theorem(necessarily(esk72_0))|necessitation))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[necessitation])])])])])])). 0.19/0.39 fof(c_0_14, plain, ![X208, X209]:(~op_strict_implies|necessarily(implies(X208,X209))=strict_implies(X208,X209)), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[op_strict_implies])])])])). 0.19/0.39 fof(c_0_15, plain, ![X47, X48]:((~modus_ponens|(~is_a_theorem(X47)|~is_a_theorem(implies(X47,X48))|is_a_theorem(X48)))&(((is_a_theorem(esk21_0)|modus_ponens)&(is_a_theorem(implies(esk21_0,esk22_0))|modus_ponens))&(~is_a_theorem(esk22_0)|modus_ponens))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[modus_ponens])])])])])). 0.19/0.39 fof(c_0_16, plain, ![X75, X76]:((~implies_2|is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X75,implies(X75,X76)),implies(X75,X76))))&(~is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk35_0,implies(esk35_0,esk36_0)),implies(esk35_0,esk36_0)))|implies_2)), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[implies_2])])])])). 0.19/0.39 fof(c_0_17, plain, ![X186]:((~is_a_theorem(strict_implies(esk85_0,and(esk85_0,esk85_0)))|axiom_m4)&(~axiom_m4|is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X186,and(X186,X186))))), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_m4])])])])). 0.19/0.39 fof(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, ~axiom_m4, inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])). 0.19/0.39 cnf(c_0_19, plain, (is_a_theorem(necessarily(X1))|~necessitation|~is_a_theorem(X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])). 0.19/0.39 cnf(c_0_20, plain, (necessitation), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[km5_necessitation])). 0.19/0.39 cnf(c_0_21, plain, (necessarily(implies(X1,X2))=strict_implies(X1,X2)|~op_strict_implies), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])). 0.19/0.39 cnf(c_0_22, plain, (op_strict_implies), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[s1_0_op_strict_implies])). 0.19/0.39 cnf(c_0_23, plain, (is_a_theorem(X2)|~modus_ponens|~is_a_theorem(X1)|~is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15])). 0.19/0.39 cnf(c_0_24, plain, (modus_ponens), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[hilbert_modus_ponens])). 0.19/0.39 cnf(c_0_25, plain, (is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,implies(X1,X2)),implies(X1,X2)))|~implies_2), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])). 0.19/0.39 cnf(c_0_26, plain, (implies_2), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[hilbert_implies_2])). 0.19/0.39 fof(c_0_27, plain, ![X9, X10]:((~is_a_theorem(implies(esk1_0,implies(esk2_0,and(esk1_0,esk2_0))))|and_3)&(~and_3|is_a_theorem(implies(X9,implies(X10,and(X9,X10)))))), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[and_3])])])])). 0.19/0.39 cnf(c_0_28, plain, (axiom_m4|~is_a_theorem(strict_implies(esk85_0,and(esk85_0,esk85_0)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])). 0.19/0.39 cnf(c_0_29, negated_conjecture, (~axiom_m4), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18])). 0.19/0.39 cnf(c_0_30, plain, (is_a_theorem(necessarily(X1))|~is_a_theorem(X1)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19, c_0_20])])). 0.19/0.39 cnf(c_0_31, plain, (necessarily(implies(X1,X2))=strict_implies(X1,X2)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_22])])). 0.19/0.39 cnf(c_0_32, plain, (is_a_theorem(X1)|~is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1))|~is_a_theorem(X2)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23, c_0_24])])). 0.19/0.39 cnf(c_0_33, plain, (is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,implies(X1,X2)),implies(X1,X2)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25, c_0_26])])). 0.19/0.39 cnf(c_0_34, plain, (is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,and(X1,X2))))|~and_3), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27])). 0.19/0.39 cnf(c_0_35, plain, (and_3), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[hilbert_and_3])). 0.19/0.39 cnf(c_0_36, plain, (~is_a_theorem(strict_implies(esk85_0,and(esk85_0,esk85_0)))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_28, c_0_29])). 0.19/0.39 cnf(c_0_37, plain, (is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X1,X2))|~is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30, c_0_31])). 0.19/0.39 cnf(c_0_38, plain, (is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))|~is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X1,X2)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32, c_0_33])). 0.19/0.39 cnf(c_0_39, plain, (is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,and(X1,X2))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_34, c_0_35])])). 0.19/0.39 cnf(c_0_40, plain, (~is_a_theorem(implies(esk85_0,and(esk85_0,esk85_0)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36, c_0_37])). 0.19/0.39 cnf(c_0_41, plain, (is_a_theorem(implies(X1,and(X1,X1)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38, c_0_39])). 0.19/0.39 cnf(c_0_42, plain, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_40, c_0_41])]), ['proof']). 0.19/0.39 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.19/0.39 # Proof object total steps : 43 0.19/0.39 # Proof object clause steps : 23 0.19/0.39 # Proof object formula steps : 20 0.19/0.39 # Proof object conjectures : 4 0.19/0.39 # Proof object clause conjectures : 1 0.19/0.39 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3 0.19/0.39 # Proof object initial clauses used : 12 0.19/0.39 # Proof object initial formulas used : 12 0.19/0.39 # Proof object generating inferences : 4 0.19/0.39 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 13 0.19/0.39 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative 0.19/0.39 # Parsed axioms : 88 0.19/0.39 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 0.19/0.39 # Initial clauses : 146 0.19/0.39 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0 0.19/0.39 # Initial clauses in saturation : 146 0.19/0.39 # Processed clauses : 386 0.19/0.39 # ...of these trivial : 30 0.19/0.39 # ...subsumed : 40 0.19/0.39 # ...remaining for further processing : 316 0.19/0.39 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 0.19/0.39 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.19/0.39 # Backward-subsumed : 4 0.19/0.39 # Backward-rewritten : 9 0.19/0.39 # Generated clauses : 400 0.19/0.39 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 377 0.19/0.39 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.19/0.39 # Paramodulations : 400 0.19/0.39 # Factorizations : 0 0.19/0.39 # Equation resolutions : 0 0.19/0.39 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.19/0.39 # Propositional check models : 0 0.19/0.39 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.19/0.39 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.19/0.39 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.19/0.39 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.19/0.39 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.19/0.39 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.19/0.39 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.19/0.39 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.19/0.39 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.19/0.39 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.19/0.39 # Current number of processed clauses : 188 0.19/0.39 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 65 0.19/0.39 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.19/0.39 # Negative unit clauses : 4 0.19/0.39 # Non-unit-clauses : 119 0.19/0.39 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 249 0.19/0.39 # ...number of literals in the above : 562 0.19/0.39 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.19/0.39 # Current number of archived clauses : 128 0.19/0.39 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2104 0.19/0.39 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1678 0.19/0.39 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 42 0.19/0.39 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 258 0.19/0.39 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.19/0.39 # BW rewrite match attempts : 109 0.19/0.39 # BW rewrite match successes : 10 0.19/0.39 # Condensation attempts : 0 0.19/0.39 # Condensation successes : 0 0.19/0.39 # Termbank termtop insertions : 14123 0.19/0.39 0.19/0.39 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.19/0.39 # User time : 0.054 s 0.19/0.39 # System time : 0.006 s 0.19/0.39 # Total time : 0.060 s 0.19/0.39 # Maximum resident set size: 1688 pages 0.19/0.39 EOF