TSTP Solution File: TOP045+4 by nanoCoP---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : nanoCoP---2.0
% Problem : TOP045+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 12:39:09 EDT 2023
% Result : Unknown 163.67s 162.19s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11 % Problem : TOP045+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Thu May 18 19:59:54 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 12.43/12.20 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 12.43/12.20 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 12.43/12.20 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 25.61/25.37 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 25.61/25.37 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 25.61/25.37 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 38.20/38.49 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 38.20/38.49 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 38.20/38.49 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 52.88/52.87 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 52.88/52.87 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 52.88/52.87 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 59.38/59.49 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 59.38/59.49 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 59.38/59.49 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 70.77/70.48 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 70.77/70.48 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 70.77/70.48 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 82.35/82.03 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 82.35/82.03 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 82.35/82.03 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 93.80/93.32 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 93.80/93.32 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 93.80/93.32 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 110.08/109.35 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 110.08/109.35 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 110.08/109.35 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 163.60/161.65 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 163.60/161.65 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 163.60/161.65 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 163.67/162.19 Timeout
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------