TSTP Solution File: TOP033+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : TOP033+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 21:34:52 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 1.94s 2.21s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11 % Problem : TOP033+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.18/0.33 % DateTime : Sun May 29 07:18:53 EDT 2022
% 0.18/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.18/0.36 The process was started by sandbox on n022.cluster.edu,
% 0.18/0.36 Sun May 29 07:18:53 2022
% 0.18/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 29067.
% 0.18/0.36
% 0.18/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.18/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.18/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.18/0.36
% 0.18/0.36 formula_list(usable).
% 0.18/0.36
% 0.18/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=14.
% 0.18/0.36
% 0.18/0.36 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.18/0.36 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.18/0.36 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.18/0.36 clauses in usable.
% 0.18/0.36
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.18/0.36
% 0.18/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.18/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 19 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)|v2_t_0topsp(A)| -l1_pre_topc(A)| -m1_pre_topc(B,A)|v3_struct_0(B)| -v2_t_0topsp(B)|v2_tex_2(B,A).
% 0.18/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 49 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l1_pre_topc(A)|v3_struct_0(A)|v2_t_0topsp(A)| -v3_realset2(A).
% 0.18/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 50 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -l1_pre_topc(A)| -m1_pre_topc(B,A)|v3_struct_0(B)|v2_t_0topsp(B)| -v2_tsp_2(B,A).
% 0.18/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 45 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)| -l1_pre_topc(A)| -m1_pre_topc(B,A)| -v2_tsp_2(B,A)|v2_pre_topc(B).
% 0.18/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 49 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l1_pre_topc(A)|v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)|v2_t_0topsp(A)| -v3_realset2(A).
% 0.18/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 60 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l1_pre_topc(A)|v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)|v2_t_0topsp(A)| -v1_tdlat_3(A).
% 0.18/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 45 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)| -l1_pre_topc(A)| -m1_pre_topc(B,A)|v1_tex_3(B,A)|v2_pre_topc(B).
% 0.18/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 61 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)| -l1_pre_topc(A)| -m1_pre_topc(B,A)|v1_tex_3(B,A)| -v2_tsp_2(B,A).
% 0.18/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 45 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)| -l1_pre_topc(A)| -m1_pre_topc(B,A)| -v1_tsep_1(B,A)| -v2_tsp_2(B,A)|v2_pre_topc(B).
% 0.18/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 63 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -v2_pre_topc(A)| -l1_pre_topc(A)| -m1_subset_1(B,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(A)))| -v3_pre_topc(B,A)| -v3_tops_1(B,A)|v2_tops_1(B,A).
% 0.18/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 65 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l1_pre_topc(A)|v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)| -v2_tdlat_3(A)| -v2_t_0topsp(A)|v3_realset2(A).
% 0.18/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 8 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l1_pre_topc(A)|v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)| -v2_tdlat_3(A)| -v2_t_0topsp(A)|v1_tdlat_3(A).
% 0.18/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 45 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)| -l1_pre_topc(A)| -m1_pre_topc(B,A)| -v1_tsep_1(B,A)| -v2_tex_2(B,A)|v2_pre_topc(B).
% 0.18/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 66 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)| -l1_pre_topc(A)| -m1_pre_topc(B,A)| -v1_tsep_1(B,A)| -v2_tex_2(B,A)| -v2_tsp_2(B,A).
% 0.18/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 65 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l1_pre_topc(A)|v3_struct_0(A)|v3_realset2(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)| -v2_t_0topsp(A)| -v2_tdlat_3(A).
% 0.18/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 10 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)| -l1_pre_topc(A)| -m1_pre_topc(B,A)| -v2_tex_2(B,A)| -v2_tsp_2(B,A)|v2_pre_topc(B).
% 0.18/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 66 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)| -l1_pre_topc(A)| -m1_pre_topc(B,A)| -v2_tex_2(B,A)| -v2_tsp_2(B,A)| -v1_tsep_1(B,A).
% 0.18/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 9 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l1_pre_topc(A)|v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)| -v3_tdlat_3(A)| -v2_t_0topsp(A)|v1_tdlat_3(A).
% 0.18/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 45 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)| -l1_pre_topc(A)| -m1_pre_topc(B,A)| -v1_borsuk_1(B,A)| -v2_tsp_2(B,A)|v2_pre_topc(B).
% 0.18/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 11 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)| -l1_pre_topc(A)| -m1_pre_topc(B,A)| -v1_borsuk_1(B,A)| -v2_tsp_2(B,A)| -v2_tex_2(B,A).
% 0.18/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 9 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l1_pre_topc(A)|v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)|v1_tdlat_3(A)| -v3_tdlat_3(A)| -v2_t_0topsp(A).
% 0.18/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 45 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)| -l1_pre_topc(A)| -m1_pre_topc(B,A)| -v2_tex_2(B,A)| -v1_borsuk_1(B,A)|v2_pre_topc(B).
% 0.18/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 11 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)| -l1_pre_topc(A)| -m1_pre_topc(B,A)| -v2_tex_2(B,A)| -v1_borsuk_1(B,A)| -v2_tsp_2(B,A).
% 0.18/0.37 45 back subsumes 10.
% 0.18/0.37
% 0.18/0.37 ------------> process sos:
% 0.18/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 238 during input processing: 0 [copy,238,flip.1] {-} k3_xboole_0(A,B)=k3_xboole_0(B,A).
% 0.18/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 265 during input processing: 0 [copy,265,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.18/0.37 265 back subsumes 229.
% 0.18/0.37 265 back subsumes 227.
% 0.18/0.37 265 back subsumes 222.
% 0.18/0.37 265 back subsumes 221.
% 0.18/0.37
% 0.18/0.37 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.18/0.48
% 0.18/0.48 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.18/0.48
% 0.18/0.48 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.18/0.48
% 0.18/0.48
% 0.18/0.48 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.18/0.48
% 0.18/0.48 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.18/0.48 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.18/0.48 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.18/0.48 number of clauses in intial UL: 221
% 0.18/0.48 number of clauses initially in problem: 257
% 0.18/0.48 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 85
% 0.18/0.48 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 92
% 0.18/0.48 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 99
% 0.18/0.48 absolute distinct symbol count: 84
% 0.18/0.48 distinct predicate count: 46
% 0.18/0.48 distinct function count: 30
% 0.18/0.48 distinct constant count: 8
% 0.18/0.48
% 0.18/0.48 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.18/0.48
% 0.18/0.48
% 0.18/0.48
% 0.18/0.48 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.18/0.48
% 0.18/0.48 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.18/0.48
% 0.18/0.48 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.94/2.21
% 1.94/2.21 SEGMENTATION FAULT!! This is probably caused by a
% 1.94/2.21 bug in Otter. Please send copy of the input file to
% 1.94/2.21 otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 1.94/2.21 using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 1.94/2.21
% 1.94/2.21
% 1.94/2.21 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.94/2.21
% 1.94/2.21 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.94/2.21
% 1.94/2.21 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.94/2.21
% 1.94/2.21 Model 3 [ 1 3 15015 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.94/2.21
% 1.94/2.21 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.94/2.21
% 1.94/2.21 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.94/2.21
% 1.94/2.21 Model 4 [ 2 1 4913 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.94/2.21
% 1.94/2.21 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.94/2.21
% 1.94/2.21 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.94/2.21
% 1.94/2.21 Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.94/2.21
% 1.94/2.21 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.94/2.21
% 1.94/2.21 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.94/2.21
% 1.94/2.21 Model 6 [ 6 2 17733 ] (0.00 seconds, 52540 Inserts)
% 1.94/2.21
% 1.94/2.21 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.94/2.21
% 1.94/2.21 true clauses given 3 (21.4%)
% 1.94/2.21 false clauses given 11
% 1.94/2.21
% 1.94/2.21 FALSE TRUE
% 1.94/2.21 2 2 9
% 1.94/2.21 3 1 20
% 1.94/2.21 4 3 29
% 1.94/2.21 5 2 6
% 1.94/2.21 6 2 15
% 1.94/2.21 7 2 4
% 1.94/2.21 8 1 1
% 1.94/2.21 18 0 1
% 1.94/2.21 23 0 9
% 1.94/2.21 24 0 4
% 1.94/2.21 tot: 13 98 (88.3% true)
% 1.94/2.21
% 1.94/2.21
% 1.94/2.21 Model 6 [ 6 2 17733 ] (0.00 seconds, 52540 Inserts)
% 1.94/2.21
% 1.94/2.21 SEGMENTATION FAULT!! This is probably caused by a
% 1.94/2.21 bug in Otter. Please send copy of the input file to
% 1.94/2.21 otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 1.94/2.21 using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 1.94/2.21
% 1.94/2.21
% 1.94/2.21 The job finished Sun May 29 07:18:55 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------