TSTP Solution File: TOP029+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : TOP029+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 21:34:52 EDT 2022
% Result : Timeout 300.06s 300.40s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : TOP029+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Sun May 29 14:37:39 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.19/0.36 The process was started by sandbox on n020.cluster.edu,
% 0.19/0.36 Sun May 29 14:37:39 2022
% 0.19/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 20220.
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.19/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.19/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 formula_list(usable).
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=8.
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.19/0.36 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.19/0.36 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.19/0.36 clauses in usable.
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 20 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)|v2_t_0topsp(A)| -l1_pre_topc(A)| -m1_pre_topc(B,A)|v3_struct_0(B)| -v2_t_0topsp(B)|v2_tex_2(B,A).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 49 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l1_pre_topc(A)|v3_struct_0(A)|v2_t_0topsp(A)| -v3_realset2(A).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 50 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -l1_pre_topc(A)| -m1_pre_topc(B,A)|v3_struct_0(B)|v2_t_0topsp(B)| -v2_tsp_2(B,A).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 46 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)| -l1_pre_topc(A)| -m1_pre_topc(B,A)| -v2_tsp_2(B,A)|v2_pre_topc(B).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 49 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l1_pre_topc(A)|v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)|v2_t_0topsp(A)| -v3_realset2(A).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 60 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l1_pre_topc(A)|v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)|v2_t_0topsp(A)| -v1_tdlat_3(A).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 46 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)| -l1_pre_topc(A)| -m1_pre_topc(B,A)|v1_tex_3(B,A)|v2_pre_topc(B).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 61 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)| -l1_pre_topc(A)| -m1_pre_topc(B,A)|v1_tex_3(B,A)| -v2_tsp_2(B,A).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 46 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)| -l1_pre_topc(A)| -m1_pre_topc(B,A)| -v1_tsep_1(B,A)| -v2_tsp_2(B,A)|v2_pre_topc(B).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 63 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -v2_pre_topc(A)| -l1_pre_topc(A)| -m1_subset_1(B,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(A)))| -v3_pre_topc(B,A)| -v3_tops_1(B,A)|v2_tops_1(B,A).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 65 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l1_pre_topc(A)|v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)| -v2_tdlat_3(A)| -v2_t_0topsp(A)|v3_realset2(A).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 9 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l1_pre_topc(A)|v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)| -v2_tdlat_3(A)| -v2_t_0topsp(A)|v1_tdlat_3(A).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 46 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)| -l1_pre_topc(A)| -m1_pre_topc(B,A)| -v1_tsep_1(B,A)| -v2_tex_2(B,A)|v2_pre_topc(B).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 66 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)| -l1_pre_topc(A)| -m1_pre_topc(B,A)| -v1_tsep_1(B,A)| -v2_tex_2(B,A)| -v2_tsp_2(B,A).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 65 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l1_pre_topc(A)|v3_struct_0(A)|v3_realset2(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)| -v2_t_0topsp(A)| -v2_tdlat_3(A).
% 0.19/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 11 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)| -l1_pre_topc(A)| -m1_pre_topc(B,A)| -v2_tex_2(B,A)| -v2_tsp_2(B,A)|v2_pre_topc(B).
% 0.19/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 66 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)| -l1_pre_topc(A)| -m1_pre_topc(B,A)| -v2_tex_2(B,A)| -v2_tsp_2(B,A)| -v1_tsep_1(B,A).
% 0.19/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 10 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l1_pre_topc(A)|v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)| -v3_tdlat_3(A)| -v2_t_0topsp(A)|v1_tdlat_3(A).
% 0.19/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 46 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)| -l1_pre_topc(A)| -m1_pre_topc(B,A)| -v1_borsuk_1(B,A)| -v2_tsp_2(B,A)|v2_pre_topc(B).
% 0.19/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 12 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)| -l1_pre_topc(A)| -m1_pre_topc(B,A)| -v1_borsuk_1(B,A)| -v2_tsp_2(B,A)| -v2_tex_2(B,A).
% 0.19/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 10 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l1_pre_topc(A)|v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)|v1_tdlat_3(A)| -v3_tdlat_3(A)| -v2_t_0topsp(A).
% 0.19/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 46 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)| -l1_pre_topc(A)| -m1_pre_topc(B,A)| -v2_tex_2(B,A)| -v1_borsuk_1(B,A)|v2_pre_topc(B).
% 0.19/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 12 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_pre_topc(A)| -l1_pre_topc(A)| -m1_pre_topc(B,A)| -v2_tex_2(B,A)| -v1_borsuk_1(B,A)| -v2_tsp_2(B,A).
% 0.19/0.37 46 back subsumes 11.
% 0.19/0.37
% 0.19/0.37 ------------> process sos:
% 0.19/0.37 247 back subsumes 204.
% 0.19/0.37 247 back subsumes 202.
% 0.19/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 248 during input processing: 0 [copy,248,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.19/0.37 248 back subsumes 205.
% 0.19/0.37
% 0.19/0.37 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.41
% 0.19/0.41 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.41
% 0.19/0.41 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.41
% 0.19/0.41
% 0.19/0.41 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.41
% 0.19/0.41 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.41 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.41 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.41 number of clauses in intial UL: 199
% 0.19/0.41 number of clauses initially in problem: 242
% 0.19/0.41 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 82
% 0.19/0.41 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 93
% 0.19/0.41 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 99
% 0.19/0.41 absolute distinct symbol count: 80
% 0.19/0.41 distinct predicate count: 40
% 0.19/0.41 distinct function count: 27
% 0.19/0.41 distinct constant count: 13
% 0.19/0.41
% 0.19/0.41 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.41
% 0.19/0.41
% 0.19/0.41
% 0.19/0.41 =========== start of search ===========
% 300.06/300.40 Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------