TSTP Solution File: TOP025+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : TOP025+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 21:25:28 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.22s 1.40s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   30 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  123 (  18 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   19 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  149 (  56   ~;  54   |;  24   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;  13  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   11 (   9 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   29 (   0 sgn  20   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t3_tsp_2,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
        & v2_pre_topc(X1)
        & l1_pre_topc(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
         => ~ ( ( v3_pre_topc(X2,X1)
                | v4_pre_topc(X2,X1) )
              & v1_tsp_2(X2,X1)
              & v1_tex_2(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t3_tsp_2) ).

fof(d5_tsp_2,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
        & v2_pre_topc(X1)
        & l1_pre_topc(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
         => ( v1_tsp_2(X2,X1)
          <=> ( v1_tsp_1(X2,X1)
              & k3_tex_4(X1,X2) = u1_struct_0(X1) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d5_tsp_2) ).

fof(t62_tex_4,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
        & v2_pre_topc(X1)
        & l1_pre_topc(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
         => ( v4_pre_topc(X2,X1)
           => k3_tex_4(X1,X2) = X2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t62_tex_4) ).

fof(t58_tex_4,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
        & v2_pre_topc(X1)
        & l1_pre_topc(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
         => ( v3_pre_topc(X2,X1)
           => k3_tex_4(X1,X2) = X2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t58_tex_4) ).

fof(t5_tex_2,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(X1))
     => ( v1_tex_2(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(X1))
      <=> X2 != X1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t5_tex_2) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
          & v2_pre_topc(X1)
          & l1_pre_topc(X1) )
       => ! [X2] :
            ( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
           => ~ ( ( v3_pre_topc(X2,X1)
                  | v4_pre_topc(X2,X1) )
                & v1_tsp_2(X2,X1)
                & v1_tex_2(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t3_tsp_2]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ( v1_tsp_1(X4,X3)
        | ~ v1_tsp_2(X4,X3)
        | ~ m1_subset_1(X4,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X3)))
        | v3_struct_0(X3)
        | ~ v2_pre_topc(X3)
        | ~ l1_pre_topc(X3) )
      & ( k3_tex_4(X3,X4) = u1_struct_0(X3)
        | ~ v1_tsp_2(X4,X3)
        | ~ m1_subset_1(X4,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X3)))
        | v3_struct_0(X3)
        | ~ v2_pre_topc(X3)
        | ~ l1_pre_topc(X3) )
      & ( ~ v1_tsp_1(X4,X3)
        | k3_tex_4(X3,X4) != u1_struct_0(X3)
        | v1_tsp_2(X4,X3)
        | ~ m1_subset_1(X4,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X3)))
        | v3_struct_0(X3)
        | ~ v2_pre_topc(X3)
        | ~ l1_pre_topc(X3) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[d5_tsp_2])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ v3_struct_0(esk1_0)
    & v2_pre_topc(esk1_0)
    & l1_pre_topc(esk1_0)
    & m1_subset_1(esk2_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0)))
    & ( v3_pre_topc(esk2_0,esk1_0)
      | v4_pre_topc(esk2_0,esk1_0) )
    & v1_tsp_2(esk2_0,esk1_0)
    & v1_tex_2(esk2_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0))) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( v3_struct_0(X3)
      | ~ v2_pre_topc(X3)
      | ~ l1_pre_topc(X3)
      | ~ m1_subset_1(X4,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X3)))
      | ~ v4_pre_topc(X4,X3)
      | k3_tex_4(X3,X4) = X4 ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[t62_tex_4])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X1)
    | k3_tex_4(X1,X2) = u1_struct_0(X1)
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ v2_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
    | ~ v1_tsp_2(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    v1_tsp_2(esk2_0,esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    m1_subset_1(esk2_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    l1_pre_topc(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    v2_pre_topc(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v3_struct_0(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( v3_struct_0(X3)
      | ~ v2_pre_topc(X3)
      | ~ l1_pre_topc(X3)
      | ~ m1_subset_1(X4,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X3)))
      | ~ v3_pre_topc(X4,X3)
      | k3_tex_4(X3,X4) = X4 ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[t58_tex_4])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( k3_tex_4(X1,X2) = X2
    | v3_struct_0(X1)
    | ~ v4_pre_topc(X2,X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ v2_pre_topc(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    k3_tex_4(esk1_0,esk2_0) = u1_struct_0(esk1_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),c_0_12]),c_0_13])]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( k3_tex_4(X1,X2) = X2
    | v3_struct_0(X1)
    | ~ v3_pre_topc(X2,X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ v2_pre_topc(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

fof(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ( ~ v1_tex_2(X4,k1_zfmisc_1(X3))
        | X4 != X3
        | ~ m1_subset_1(X4,k1_zfmisc_1(X3)) )
      & ( X4 = X3
        | v1_tex_2(X4,k1_zfmisc_1(X3))
        | ~ m1_subset_1(X4,k1_zfmisc_1(X3)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t5_tex_2])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( u1_struct_0(esk1_0) = esk2_0
    | ~ v4_pre_topc(esk2_0,esk1_0) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_11]),c_0_12]),c_0_13])]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( v4_pre_topc(esk2_0,esk1_0)
    | v3_pre_topc(esk2_0,esk1_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( u1_struct_0(esk1_0) = esk2_0
    | ~ v3_pre_topc(esk2_0,esk1_0) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_17]),c_0_11]),c_0_12]),c_0_13])]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2))
    | X1 != X2
    | ~ v1_tex_2(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    v1_tex_2(esk2_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    u1_struct_0(esk1_0) = esk2_0,
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ v1_tex_2(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X1))
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X1)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    v1_tex_2(esk2_0,k1_zfmisc_1(esk2_0)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ~ m1_subset_1(esk2_0,k1_zfmisc_1(esk2_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_25]),c_0_28]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : TOP025+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sun May 29 04:16:39 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/1.40  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.22/1.40  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.22/1.40  # Preprocessing time       : 0.017 s
% 0.22/1.40  
% 0.22/1.40  # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.22/1.40  # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.22/1.40  # Parsed axioms                        : 61
% 0.22/1.40  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 47
% 0.22/1.40  # Initial clauses                      : 33
% 0.22/1.40  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 33
% 0.22/1.40  # Processed clauses                    : 41
% 0.22/1.40  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # ...subsumed                          : 4
% 0.22/1.40  # ...remaining for further processing  : 37
% 0.22/1.40  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1
% 0.22/1.40  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.22/1.40  # Generated clauses                    : 13
% 0.22/1.40  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 9
% 0.22/1.40  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Paramodulations                      : 12
% 0.22/1.40  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Equation resolutions                 : 1
% 0.22/1.40  # Current number of processed clauses  : 35
% 0.22/1.40  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 9
% 0.22/1.40  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.22/1.40  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.22/1.40  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 23
% 0.22/1.40  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.22/1.40  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Current number of archived clauses   : 1
% 0.22/1.40  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 45
% 0.22/1.40  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 16
% 0.22/1.40  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.22/1.40  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 10
% 0.22/1.40  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 5
% 0.22/1.40  # BW rewrite match successes           : 5
% 0.22/1.40  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 2643
% 0.22/1.40  
% 0.22/1.40  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/1.40  # User time                : 0.013 s
% 0.22/1.40  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.22/1.40  # Total time               : 0.018 s
% 0.22/1.40  # Maximum resident set size: 3052 pages
% 0.22/1.40  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.22/1.40  # Preprocessing time       : 0.019 s
% 0.22/1.40  
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof found!
% 0.22/1.40  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/1.40  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object total steps             : 30
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object clause steps            : 19
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object formula steps           : 11
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object conjectures             : 17
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 14
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 11
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 5
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object generating inferences   : 5
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 20
% 0.22/1.40  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.22/1.40  # Parsed axioms                        : 61
% 0.22/1.40  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Initial clauses                      : 146
% 0.22/1.40  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 8
% 0.22/1.40  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 138
% 0.22/1.40  # Processed clauses                    : 183
% 0.22/1.40  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # ...subsumed                          : 9
% 0.22/1.40  # ...remaining for further processing  : 173
% 0.22/1.40  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1
% 0.22/1.40  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Backward-rewritten                   : 22
% 0.22/1.40  # Generated clauses                    : 528
% 0.22/1.40  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 514
% 0.22/1.40  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
% 0.22/1.40  # Paramodulations                      : 527
% 0.22/1.40  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Equation resolutions                 : 1
% 0.22/1.40  # Current number of processed clauses  : 150
% 0.22/1.40  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 24
% 0.22/1.40  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/1.40  #    Negative unit clauses             : 7
% 0.22/1.40  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 119
% 0.22/1.40  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 399
% 0.22/1.40  # ...number of literals in the above   : 1515
% 0.22/1.40  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Current number of archived clauses   : 22
% 0.22/1.40  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5097
% 0.22/1.40  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1701
% 0.22/1.40  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 11
% 0.22/1.40  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 252
% 0.22/1.40  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 0.22/1.40  # BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.22/1.40  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 13545
% 0.22/1.40  
% 0.22/1.40  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/1.40  # User time                : 0.029 s
% 0.22/1.40  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.22/1.40  # Total time               : 0.032 s
% 0.22/1.40  # Maximum resident set size: 3612 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------