TSTP Solution File: TOP024+4 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : TOP024+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 21:24:31 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 13.25s 5.67s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 13.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   31 (  18 unt;   4 nHn;  31 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   66 (   9 equ;  35 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   7 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_1218,plain,
    ( m1_subset_1(k6_pre_topc(X1,X2),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-kck_1e49/lgb.p',i_0_1218) ).

cnf(i_0_3931,negated_conjecture,
    m1_subset_1(esk540_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk539_0))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-kck_1e49/lgb.p',i_0_3931) ).

cnf(i_0_3932,negated_conjecture,
    l1_pre_topc(esk539_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-kck_1e49/lgb.p',i_0_3932) ).

cnf(i_0_4383,plain,
    ( r1_tarski(X1,X2)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-kck_1e49/lgb.p',i_0_4383) ).

cnf(i_0_1013,plain,
    ( k3_tex_4(X1,X2) = u1_struct_0(X1)
    | v3_struct_0(X1)
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ v2_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ v1_tsp_2(X2,X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-kck_1e49/lgb.p',i_0_1013) ).

cnf(i_0_3930,negated_conjecture,
    v1_tsp_2(esk540_0,esk539_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-kck_1e49/lgb.p',i_0_3930) ).

cnf(i_0_3933,negated_conjecture,
    v2_pre_topc(esk539_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-kck_1e49/lgb.p',i_0_3933) ).

cnf(i_0_3934,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v3_struct_0(esk539_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-kck_1e49/lgb.p',i_0_3934) ).

cnf(i_0_545,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ r1_tarski(X2,X1)
    | ~ r1_tarski(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-kck_1e49/lgb.p',i_0_545) ).

cnf(i_0_5257,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X1)
    | r1_tarski(k3_tex_4(X1,X2),k6_pre_topc(X1,X2))
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ v2_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-kck_1e49/lgb.p',i_0_5257) ).

cnf(i_0_797,plain,
    ( v1_tops_1(X1,X2)
    | k6_pre_topc(X2,X1) != u1_struct_0(X2)
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X2)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X2))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-kck_1e49/lgb.p',i_0_797) ).

cnf(i_0_3929,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v1_tops_1(esk540_0,esk539_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-kck_1e49/lgb.p',i_0_3929) ).

cnf(c_0_5270,plain,
    ( m1_subset_1(k6_pre_topc(X1,X2),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    i_0_1218 ).

cnf(c_0_5271,negated_conjecture,
    m1_subset_1(esk540_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk539_0))),
    i_0_3931 ).

cnf(c_0_5272,negated_conjecture,
    l1_pre_topc(esk539_0),
    i_0_3932 ).

cnf(c_0_5273,plain,
    ( r1_tarski(X1,X2)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2)) ),
    i_0_4383 ).

cnf(c_0_5274,negated_conjecture,
    m1_subset_1(k6_pre_topc(esk539_0,esk540_0),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk539_0))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5270,c_0_5271]),c_0_5272])]) ).

cnf(c_0_5275,plain,
    ( k3_tex_4(X1,X2) = u1_struct_0(X1)
    | v3_struct_0(X1)
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ v2_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ v1_tsp_2(X2,X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    i_0_1013 ).

cnf(c_0_5276,negated_conjecture,
    v1_tsp_2(esk540_0,esk539_0),
    i_0_3930 ).

cnf(c_0_5277,negated_conjecture,
    v2_pre_topc(esk539_0),
    i_0_3933 ).

cnf(c_0_5278,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v3_struct_0(esk539_0),
    i_0_3934 ).

cnf(c_0_5279,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ r1_tarski(X2,X1)
    | ~ r1_tarski(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_545 ).

cnf(c_0_5280,plain,
    r1_tarski(k6_pre_topc(esk539_0,esk540_0),u1_struct_0(esk539_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5273,c_0_5274]) ).

cnf(c_0_5281,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X1)
    | r1_tarski(k3_tex_4(X1,X2),k6_pre_topc(X1,X2))
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ v2_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    i_0_5257 ).

cnf(c_0_5282,negated_conjecture,
    k3_tex_4(esk539_0,esk540_0) = u1_struct_0(esk539_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5275,c_0_5276]),c_0_5277]),c_0_5272]),c_0_5271])]),c_0_5278]) ).

cnf(c_0_5283,plain,
    ( k6_pre_topc(esk539_0,esk540_0) = u1_struct_0(esk539_0)
    | ~ r1_tarski(u1_struct_0(esk539_0),k6_pre_topc(esk539_0,esk540_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5279,c_0_5280]) ).

cnf(c_0_5284,negated_conjecture,
    r1_tarski(u1_struct_0(esk539_0),k6_pre_topc(esk539_0,esk540_0)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5281,c_0_5271]),c_0_5282]),c_0_5277]),c_0_5272])]),c_0_5278]) ).

cnf(c_0_5285,plain,
    ( v1_tops_1(X1,X2)
    | k6_pre_topc(X2,X1) != u1_struct_0(X2)
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X2)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X2))) ),
    i_0_797 ).

cnf(c_0_5286,plain,
    k6_pre_topc(esk539_0,esk540_0) = u1_struct_0(esk539_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5283,c_0_5284])]) ).

cnf(c_0_5287,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v1_tops_1(esk540_0,esk539_0),
    i_0_3929 ).

cnf(c_0_5288,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5285,c_0_5286]),c_0_5272]),c_0_5271])]),c_0_5287]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : TOP024+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.11/0.33  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.11/0.33  % DateTime : Sun May 29 04:04:30 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 1.36/1.57  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.36/1.57  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 1.36/1.57  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 1.36/1.57  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 13.25/5.67  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 13.25/5.67  # No SInE strategy applied
% 13.25/5.67  # Trying AutoSched0 for 149 seconds
% 13.25/5.67  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d
% 13.25/5.67  # and selection function SelectCQIPrecWNTNp.
% 13.25/5.67  #
% 13.25/5.67  # Preprocessing time       : 0.035 s
% 13.25/5.67  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 13.25/5.67  
% 13.25/5.67  # Proof found!
% 13.25/5.67  # SZS status Theorem
% 13.25/5.67  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 13.25/5.67  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 13.25/5.67  
% 13.25/5.67  # -------------------------------------------------
% 13.25/5.67  # User time                : 0.266 s
% 13.25/5.67  # System time              : 0.012 s
% 13.25/5.67  # Total time               : 0.278 s
% 13.25/5.67  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 13.25/5.67  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------