TSTP Solution File: SYO691-1.000 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : SYO691-1.000 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 03:38:49 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.92s 1.13s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.92s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named definition)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,plain,
top(f(f(X0,X1),f(X2,a)),f(f(X2,f(X1,a)),X0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule_1) ).
cnf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
~ seq(succ(succ(succ(zero))),X0,X0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove) ).
cnf(c_51,plain,
( ~ top(X0,X1)
| step(X0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rewrite_top) ).
cnf(c_52,plain,
( ~ step(X0,X1)
| step(f(X0,X2),f(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rewrite_left) ).
cnf(c_53,plain,
( ~ step(X0,X1)
| step(f(X2,X0),f(X2,X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rewrite_right) ).
cnf(c_54,plain,
seq(zero,X0,X0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rewrite_sequence_zero) ).
cnf(c_55,plain,
( ~ seq(X0,X1,X2)
| ~ step(X2,X3)
| seq(succ(X0),X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rewrite_sequence_succ) ).
cnf(c_86,plain,
step(f(f(X0,X1),f(X2,a)),f(f(X2,f(X1,a)),X0)),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_51]) ).
cnf(c_112,plain,
succ(zero) = sP0_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_113,plain,
succ(sP0_iProver_def) = sP1_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_114,plain,
succ(sP1_iProver_def) = sP2_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_115,negated_conjecture,
~ seq(sP2_iProver_def,X0,X0),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_112,c_113,c_114]) ).
cnf(c_258,plain,
( ~ step(X0,X1)
| seq(succ(zero),X0,X1) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_54,c_55]) ).
cnf(c_259,plain,
( ~ step(X0,X1)
| seq(sP0_iProver_def,X0,X1) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_258,c_112]) ).
cnf(c_267,plain,
( ~ step(X0,X1)
| ~ step(X1,X2)
| seq(succ(sP0_iProver_def),X0,X2) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_259,c_55]) ).
cnf(c_268,plain,
( ~ step(X0,X1)
| ~ step(X1,X2)
| seq(sP1_iProver_def,X0,X2) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_267,c_113]) ).
cnf(c_279,plain,
( ~ step(f(X0,X1),X2)
| ~ step(X3,X0)
| seq(sP1_iProver_def,f(X3,X1),X2) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_268]) ).
cnf(c_299,plain,
( ~ step(X0,X1)
| ~ step(X2,X3)
| seq(sP1_iProver_def,f(X2,X0),f(X3,X1)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_279]) ).
cnf(c_354,plain,
( ~ step(f(X0,X1),X2)
| ~ step(X3,X1)
| ~ step(X4,X0)
| seq(succ(sP1_iProver_def),f(X4,X3),X2) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_299,c_55]) ).
cnf(c_355,plain,
( ~ step(f(X0,X1),X2)
| ~ step(X3,X1)
| ~ step(X4,X0)
| seq(sP2_iProver_def,f(X4,X3),X2) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_354,c_114]) ).
cnf(c_474,plain,
( ~ step(X0,f(X1,X2))
| ~ step(X3,f(X4,a))
| seq(sP2_iProver_def,f(X0,X3),f(f(X4,f(X2,a)),X1)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_86,c_355]) ).
cnf(c_911,plain,
( ~ step(f(X0,f(X1,a)),f(X2,X1))
| ~ step(X2,f(X0,a)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_474,c_115]) ).
cnf(c_925,plain,
~ step(f(X0,f(X1,a)),f(f(X0,X1),a)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_86,c_911]) ).
cnf(c_997,plain,
$false,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_86,c_925]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.11 % Problem : SYO691-1.000 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.02/0.12 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.32 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32 % DateTime : Thu May 2 19:55:34 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.18/0.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 2.92/1.13 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.92/1.13 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.92/1.13
% 2.92/1.13 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 2.92/1.13
% 2.92/1.13 ------ iProver source info
% 2.92/1.13
% 2.92/1.13 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 2.92/1.13 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 2.92/1.13 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.92/1.13
% 2.92/1.13 ------ Parsing...successful
% 2.92/1.13
% 2.92/1.13
% 2.92/1.13
% 2.92/1.13 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 2.92/1.13
% 2.92/1.13 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 2.92/1.13
% 2.92/1.13 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 2.92/1.13 ------ Proving...
% 2.92/1.13 ------ Problem Properties
% 2.92/1.13
% 2.92/1.13
% 2.92/1.13 clauses 9
% 2.92/1.13 conjectures 1
% 2.92/1.13 EPR 2
% 2.92/1.13 Horn 9
% 2.92/1.13 unary 6
% 2.92/1.13 binary 2
% 2.92/1.13 lits 13
% 2.92/1.13 lits eq 3
% 2.92/1.13 fd_pure 0
% 2.92/1.13 fd_pseudo 0
% 2.92/1.13 fd_cond 0
% 2.92/1.13 fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 2.92/1.13 AC symbols 0
% 2.92/1.13
% 2.92/1.13 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 2.92/1.13
% 2.92/1.13 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 2.92/1.13
% 2.92/1.13
% 2.92/1.13 ------
% 2.92/1.13 Current options:
% 2.92/1.13 ------
% 2.92/1.13
% 2.92/1.13
% 2.92/1.13
% 2.92/1.13
% 2.92/1.13 ------ Proving...
% 2.92/1.13
% 2.92/1.13
% 2.92/1.13 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.92/1.13
% 2.92/1.13 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.92/1.13
% 2.92/1.13
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------