TSTP Solution File: SYO633-1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : SYO633-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 03:38:31 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.49s 1.17s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.49s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 28 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 9 RR)
% Number of literals : 86 ( 0 equ; 65 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 9 ( 3 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 84 ( 83 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_51,plain,
( ~ 'E'(f(X0),s(s(s(s(s('0'))))))
| ~ 'E'(f(X1),s(s(s(s('0')))))
| ~ 'E'(f(X2),s(s(s('0'))))
| ~ 'E'(f(X3),s(s('0')))
| ~ 'E'(f(X4),s('0'))
| ~ 'E'(f(X5),'0') ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_5_03) ).
cnf(c_52,plain,
'E'(f(X0),s(s(s(s('0'))))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_6_04) ).
cnf(c_53,plain,
'E'(f(X0),s(s(s(s(s('0')))))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_8_05) ).
cnf(c_55,plain,
( ~ 'E'(f(X0),s(s(s(s(s('0'))))))
| ~ 'E'(f(X1),s(s(s(s('0')))))
| ~ 'E'(f(X2),s(s(s('0'))))
| ~ 'E'(f(X3),s(s('0')))
| ~ 'E'(f(X4),s('0'))
| 'E'(f('AP'(s(s(s(s(s(s('0')))))),X5)),'0') ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_2_07) ).
cnf(c_57,plain,
( ~ 'E'(f(X0),s(s(s(s(s('0'))))))
| ~ 'E'(f(X1),s(s(s(s('0')))))
| ~ 'E'(f(X2),s(s(s('0'))))
| ~ 'E'(f(X3),s(s('0')))
| 'E'(f('AP'(s(s(s(s(s(s('0')))))),X4)),s('0')) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_12_09) ).
cnf(c_58,plain,
( ~ 'E'(f(X0),s(s(s(s(s('0'))))))
| ~ 'E'(f(X1),s(s(s(s('0')))))
| 'E'(f(X0),s(s(s('0')))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_1_10) ).
cnf(c_60,plain,
( ~ 'E'(f(X0),s(s(s(s(s('0'))))))
| ~ 'E'(f(X1),s(s(s(s('0')))))
| ~ 'E'(f(X2),s(s(s('0'))))
| 'E'(f('AP'(s(s(s(s(s(s('0')))))),X3)),s(s('0'))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_4_12) ).
cnf(c_75,plain,
( ~ 'E'(f(X1),s(s(s(s('0')))))
| 'E'(f(X0),s(s(s('0')))) ),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_58,c_53,c_58]) ).
cnf(c_76,plain,
( ~ 'E'(f(X0),s(s(s(s('0')))))
| 'E'(f(X1),s(s(s('0')))) ),
inference(renaming,[status(thm)],[c_75]) ).
cnf(c_87,plain,
( ~ 'E'(f(X1),s(s(s(s('0')))))
| ~ 'E'(f(X2),s(s(s('0'))))
| 'E'(f('AP'(s(s(s(s(s(s('0')))))),X3)),s(s('0'))) ),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_60,c_53,c_60]) ).
cnf(c_88,plain,
( ~ 'E'(f(X0),s(s(s(s('0')))))
| ~ 'E'(f(X1),s(s(s('0'))))
| 'E'(f('AP'(s(s(s(s(s(s('0')))))),X2)),s(s('0'))) ),
inference(renaming,[status(thm)],[c_87]) ).
cnf(c_90,plain,
'E'(f('AP'(s(s(s(s(s(s('0')))))),X2)),s(s('0'))),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_88,c_52,c_76,c_88]) ).
cnf(c_91,plain,
'E'(f('AP'(s(s(s(s(s(s('0')))))),X0)),s(s('0'))),
inference(renaming,[status(thm)],[c_90]) ).
cnf(c_99,plain,
( ~ 'E'(f(X1),s(s(s(s('0')))))
| ~ 'E'(f(X2),s(s(s('0'))))
| ~ 'E'(f(X3),s(s('0')))
| ~ 'E'(f(X4),s('0'))
| ~ 'E'(f(X5),'0') ),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_53,c_51]) ).
cnf(c_100,plain,
( ~ 'E'(f(X0),s(s(s(s('0')))))
| ~ 'E'(f(X1),s(s(s('0'))))
| ~ 'E'(f(X2),s(s('0')))
| ~ 'E'(f(X3),s('0'))
| ~ 'E'(f(X4),'0') ),
inference(renaming,[status(thm)],[c_99]) ).
cnf(c_102,plain,
( ~ 'E'(f(X2),s(s('0')))
| ~ 'E'(f(X3),s('0'))
| ~ 'E'(f(X4),'0') ),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_100,c_52,c_76,c_100]) ).
cnf(c_103,plain,
( ~ 'E'(f(X0),s(s('0')))
| ~ 'E'(f(X1),s('0'))
| ~ 'E'(f(X2),'0') ),
inference(renaming,[status(thm)],[c_102]) ).
cnf(c_105,plain,
( ~ 'E'(f(X1),s(s(s(s('0')))))
| ~ 'E'(f(X2),s(s(s('0'))))
| ~ 'E'(f(X3),s(s('0')))
| 'E'(f('AP'(s(s(s(s(s(s('0')))))),X4)),s('0')) ),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_57,c_53,c_57]) ).
cnf(c_106,plain,
( ~ 'E'(f(X0),s(s(s(s('0')))))
| ~ 'E'(f(X1),s(s(s('0'))))
| ~ 'E'(f(X2),s(s('0')))
| 'E'(f('AP'(s(s(s(s(s(s('0')))))),X3)),s('0')) ),
inference(renaming,[status(thm)],[c_105]) ).
cnf(c_108,plain,
( ~ 'E'(f(X2),s(s('0')))
| 'E'(f('AP'(s(s(s(s(s(s('0')))))),X3)),s('0')) ),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_106,c_52,c_76,c_106]) ).
cnf(c_109,plain,
( ~ 'E'(f(X0),s(s('0')))
| 'E'(f('AP'(s(s(s(s(s(s('0')))))),X1)),s('0')) ),
inference(renaming,[status(thm)],[c_108]) ).
cnf(c_117,plain,
( ~ 'E'(f(X1),s(s(s(s('0')))))
| ~ 'E'(f(X2),s(s(s('0'))))
| ~ 'E'(f(X3),s(s('0')))
| ~ 'E'(f(X4),s('0'))
| 'E'(f('AP'(s(s(s(s(s(s('0')))))),X5)),'0') ),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_53,c_55]) ).
cnf(c_118,plain,
( ~ 'E'(f(X0),s(s(s(s('0')))))
| ~ 'E'(f(X1),s(s(s('0'))))
| ~ 'E'(f(X2),s(s('0')))
| ~ 'E'(f(X3),s('0'))
| 'E'(f('AP'(s(s(s(s(s(s('0')))))),X4)),'0') ),
inference(renaming,[status(thm)],[c_117]) ).
cnf(c_120,plain,
( ~ 'E'(f(X2),s(s('0')))
| ~ 'E'(f(X3),s('0'))
| 'E'(f('AP'(s(s(s(s(s(s('0')))))),X4)),'0') ),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_118,c_52,c_76,c_118]) ).
cnf(c_121,plain,
( ~ 'E'(f(X0),s(s('0')))
| ~ 'E'(f(X1),s('0'))
| 'E'(f('AP'(s(s(s(s(s(s('0')))))),X2)),'0') ),
inference(renaming,[status(thm)],[c_120]) ).
cnf(c_159,plain,
( ~ 'E'(f(X0),s(s('0')))
| ~ 'E'(f(X1),s('0')) ),
inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_121,c_103]) ).
cnf(c_165,plain,
~ 'E'(f(X0),s(s('0'))),
inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_109,c_159]) ).
cnf(c_169,plain,
$false,
inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_91,c_165]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SYO633-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.1.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.34 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Thu May 2 19:53:40 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.47 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.49/1.17 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.49/1.17 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.49/1.17
% 0.49/1.17 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 0.49/1.17
% 0.49/1.17 ------ iProver source info
% 0.49/1.17
% 0.49/1.17 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 0.49/1.17 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 0.49/1.17 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.49/1.17
% 0.49/1.17 ------ Parsing...successful
% 0.49/1.17
% 0.49/1.17
% 0.49/1.17
% 0.49/1.17 ------ Preprocessing...
% 0.49/1.17
% 0.49/1.17 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.49/1.17
% 0.49/1.17 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.49/1.17
% 0.49/1.17
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------