%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Nitpick---2016
% Problem  : SYO575^7 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v5.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s

% Computer : n046.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory   : 32218.75MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jan 18 19:33:22 EST 2017

% Result   : CounterSatisfiable 24.02s
% Output   : FiniteModel 24.02s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYO575^7 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v5.5.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s
% 0.03/0.24  % Computer : n046.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.03/0.24  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.24  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.03/0.24  % Memory   : 32218.75MB
% 0.03/0.24  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% 0.03/0.24  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.24  % DateTime : Mon Jan 16 05:20:04 CST 2017
% 0.03/0.24  % CPUTime: 
% 24.02/9.70  Nitpicking formula...
% 24.02/9.70  Timestamp: 05:20:13
% 24.02/9.70  The type bnd_mu passed the monotonicity test; Nitpick might be able to skip
% 24.02/9.70  some scopes
% 24.02/9.70  Using SAT solver "Lingeling_JNI" The following solvers are configured:
% 24.02/9.70  "Lingeling_JNI", "CryptoMiniSat_JNI", "MiniSat_JNI", "SAT4J", "SAT4J_Light"
% 24.02/9.70  Skipping 5000 scopes. (Consider using "mono" or "merge_type_vars" to prevent
% 24.02/9.70  this.)
% 24.02/9.70  Batch 1 of 1000: Trying 5 scopes:
% 24.02/9.70    card bnd_mu = 1 and card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1
% 24.02/9.70    card bnd_mu = 2 and card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2
% 24.02/9.70    card bnd_mu = 3 and card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 3
% 24.02/9.70    card bnd_mu = 4 and card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 4
% 24.02/9.70    card bnd_mu = 5 and card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 5
% 24.02/9.70  % SZS status CounterSatisfiable % SZS output start FiniteModel
% 24.02/9.70  Nitpick found a counterexample for card bnd_mu = 2 and
% 24.02/9.70  card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2:
% 24.02/9.70  
% 24.02/9.70    Skolem constants:
% 24.02/9.70      ??.bnd_mbox_s4.V = i1
% 24.02/9.70      ??.bnd_mbox_s4.V = i1
% 24.02/9.70      ??.bnd_mbox_s4.V = i1
% 24.02/9.70      ??.bnd_mbox_s4.V = i2
% 24.02/9.70      \<lambda>Va Vb Vc. ??.bnd_mbox_s4.V =
% 24.02/9.70        (\<lambda>x. _)
% 24.02/9.70        (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)
% 24.02/9.70           (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1, i2 := i2),
% 24.02/9.70            i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1, i2 := i2)),
% 24.02/9.70         i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)
% 24.02/9.70           (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1, i2 := i2),
% 24.02/9.70            i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1, i2 := i2)))
% 24.02/9.70      ??.bnd_mvalid.W = i2
% 24.02/9.70    Constants:
% 24.02/9.70      bnd_exists_in_world =
% 24.02/9.70        (\<lambda>x. _)
% 24.02/9.70        (b1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := True),
% 24.02/9.70         b2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := False))
% 24.02/9.70      bnd_p = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := False)
% 24.02/9.70      bnd_rel_s4 =
% 24.02/9.70        (\<lambda>x. _)
% 24.02/9.70        (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := False),
% 24.02/9.70         i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := True))
% 24.02/9.70  % SZS output end FiniteModel
% 24.02/9.70  Total time: 692 ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------