TSTP Solution File: SYO574^7 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SYO574^7 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 08:48:06 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 21
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 42 ( 23 unt; 12 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 85 ( 16 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 12 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 152 ( 36 ~; 23 |; 3 &; 90 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 15 ( 3 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 51 ( 51 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 14 ( 12 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 53 ( 31 ^ 22 !; 0 ?; 53 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_24,type,
mnot: ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_25,type,
mor: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_31,type,
mimplies: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_40,type,
mreflexive: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(decl_50,type,
mvalid: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(decl_54,type,
rel_s4: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_55,type,
mbox_s4: ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_56,type,
mdia_s4: ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_57,type,
q: $i > $o ).
thf(decl_58,type,
p: $i > $o ).
thf(decl_60,type,
esk2_0: $i ).
thf(decl_61,type,
esk3_0: $i ).
thf(mimplies,axiom,
( mimplies
= ( ^ [X4: $i > $o,X5: $i > $o] : ( mor @ ( mnot @ X4 ) @ X5 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL015^0.ax',mimplies) ).
thf(mnot,axiom,
( mnot
= ( ^ [X4: $i > $o,X3: $i] :
~ ( X4 @ X3 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL015^0.ax',mnot) ).
thf(mor,axiom,
( mor
= ( ^ [X4: $i > $o,X5: $i > $o,X3: $i] :
( ( X4 @ X3 )
| ( X5 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL015^0.ax',mor) ).
thf(mdia_s4,axiom,
( mdia_s4
= ( ^ [X4: $i > $o] : ( mnot @ ( mbox_s4 @ ( mnot @ X4 ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^5.ax',mdia_s4) ).
thf(mbox_s4,axiom,
( mbox_s4
= ( ^ [X4: $i > $o,X3: $i] :
! [X7: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_s4 @ X3 @ X7 )
| ( X4 @ X7 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^5.ax',mbox_s4) ).
thf(mvalid,axiom,
( mvalid
= ( ^ [X4: $i > $o] :
! [X3: $i] : ( X4 @ X3 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL015^0.ax',mvalid) ).
thf(mreflexive,axiom,
( mreflexive
= ( ^ [X6: $i > $i > $o] :
! [X16: $i] : ( X6 @ X16 @ X16 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL015^0.ax',mreflexive) ).
thf(con,conjecture,
mvalid @ ( mimplies @ ( mdia_s4 @ ( mimplies @ p @ ( mbox_s4 @ q ) ) ) @ ( mimplies @ ( mbox_s4 @ p ) @ ( mdia_s4 @ q ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).
thf(a1,axiom,
mreflexive @ rel_s4,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^5.ax',a1) ).
thf(c_0_9,plain,
( mimplies
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
( ~ ( Z0 @ Z2 )
| ( Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mimplies]) ).
thf(c_0_10,plain,
( mnot
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i] :
~ ( Z0 @ Z1 ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mnot]) ).
thf(c_0_11,plain,
( mor
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
( ( Z0 @ Z2 )
| ( Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mor]) ).
thf(c_0_12,plain,
( mdia_s4
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i] :
~ ! [X28: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_s4 @ Z1 @ X28 )
| ~ ( Z0 @ X28 ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mdia_s4]) ).
thf(c_0_13,plain,
( mbox_s4
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i] :
! [X7: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_s4 @ Z1 @ X7 )
| ( Z0 @ X7 ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mbox_s4]) ).
thf(c_0_14,plain,
( mimplies
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
( ~ ( Z0 @ Z2 )
| ( Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]) ).
thf(c_0_15,plain,
( mvalid
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o] :
! [X3: $i] : ( Z0 @ X3 ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mvalid]) ).
thf(c_0_16,plain,
( mdia_s4
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i] :
~ ! [X28: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_s4 @ Z1 @ X28 )
| ~ ( Z0 @ X28 ) ) ) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_10]),c_0_13]) ).
thf(c_0_17,plain,
( mreflexive
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $i > $o] :
! [X16: $i] : ( Z0 @ X16 @ X16 ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mreflexive]) ).
thf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X37: $i] :
( ~ ~ ! [X34: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_s4 @ X37 @ X34 )
| ~ ( ~ ( p @ X34 )
| ! [X33: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_s4 @ X34 @ X33 )
| ( q @ X33 ) ) ) )
| ~ ! [X35: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_s4 @ X37 @ X35 )
| ( p @ X35 ) )
| ~ ! [X36: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_s4 @ X37 @ X36 )
| ~ ( q @ X36 ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]),c_0_14]),c_0_15]),c_0_13]),c_0_16])]) ).
thf(c_0_19,plain,
! [X29: $i] : ( rel_s4 @ X29 @ X29 ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[a1,c_0_17]) ).
thf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
! [X49: $i,X50: $i,X51: $i] :
( ( rel_s4 @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0 )
& ( ~ ( p @ esk3_0 )
| ~ ( rel_s4 @ esk3_0 @ X49 )
| ( q @ X49 ) )
& ( ~ ( rel_s4 @ esk2_0 @ X50 )
| ( p @ X50 ) )
& ( ~ ( rel_s4 @ esk2_0 @ X51 )
| ~ ( q @ X51 ) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_18])])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_21,plain,
! [X40: $i] : ( rel_s4 @ X40 @ X40 ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
thf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i] :
( ~ ( rel_s4 @ esk2_0 @ X3 )
| ~ ( q @ X3 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
thf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
rel_s4 @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
thf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i] :
( ( q @ X3 )
| ~ ( p @ esk3_0 )
| ~ ( rel_s4 @ esk3_0 @ X3 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
thf(c_0_25,plain,
! [X3: $i] : ( rel_s4 @ X3 @ X3 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
thf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
~ ( q @ esk3_0 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
thf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i] :
( ( p @ X3 )
| ~ ( rel_s4 @ esk2_0 @ X3 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
thf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
~ ( p @ esk3_0 ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26]) ).
thf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_23]),c_0_28]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13 % Problem : SYO574^7 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.5.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.35 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.35 % DateTime : Mon May 20 10:45:08 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.48 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.49 # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLMNHSN.
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting almost_fo_3_lam with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # ehoh_best2_full_lfho with pid 2689 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Result found by ehoh_best2_full_lfho
% 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLMNHSN.
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.49 # Search class: HHHNS-FFSF11-SHSSMFNN
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_ho_10 with 163s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # new_ho_10 with pid 2694 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLMNHSN.
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.49 # Search class: HHHNS-FFSF11-SHSSMFNN
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_ho_10 with 163s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 # Proof found!
% 0.19/0.49 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.49 # Parsed axioms : 75
% 0.19/0.49 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Initial clauses : 46
% 0.19/0.49 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 38
% 0.19/0.49 # Initial clauses in saturation : 8
% 0.19/0.49 # Processed clauses : 21
% 0.19/0.49 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # ...remaining for further processing : 20
% 0.19/0.49 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.19/0.49 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Generated clauses : 9
% 0.19/0.49 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 7
% 0.19/0.49 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Paramodulations : 9
% 0.19/0.49 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # NegExts : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Current number of processed clauses : 11
% 0.19/0.49 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.19/0.49 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.19/0.49 # Non-unit-clauses : 4
% 0.19/0.49 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2
% 0.19/0.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 4
% 0.19/0.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 9
% 0.19/0.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2
% 0.19/0.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.19/0.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.19/0.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.19/0.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Condensation attempts : 21
% 0.19/0.49 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2759
% 0.19/0.49 # Search garbage collected termcells : 580
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 # User time : 0.005 s
% 0.19/0.49 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1908 pages
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 # User time : 0.007 s
% 0.19/0.49 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Total time : 0.012 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1796 pages
% 0.19/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.19/0.50 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------