TSTP Solution File: SYO548^1 by cocATP---0.2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : cocATP---0.2.0
% Problem : SYO548^1 : TPTP v7.5.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : python CASC.py /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 0s
% DateTime : Tue Mar 29 00:52:04 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.48s 0.70s
% Output : Proof 0.48s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11 % Problem : SYO548^1 : TPTP v7.5.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : python CASC.py /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUModel : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % RAMPerCPU : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Mar 13 19:51:14 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.34 ModuleCmd_Load.c(213):ERROR:105: Unable to locate a modulefile for 'python/python27'
% 0.12/0.34 Python 2.7.5
% 0.48/0.70 Using paths ['/home/cristobal/cocATP/CASC/TPTP/', '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/', '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/']
% 0.48/0.70 FOF formula ((ex ((fofType->Prop)->fofType)) (fun (E:((fofType->Prop)->fofType))=> (forall (P:(fofType->Prop)), (((ex fofType) (fun (X:fofType)=> ((P X)->False)))->((P (E P))->False))))) of role conjecture named choicecomp
% 0.48/0.70 Conjecture to prove = ((ex ((fofType->Prop)->fofType)) (fun (E:((fofType->Prop)->fofType))=> (forall (P:(fofType->Prop)), (((ex fofType) (fun (X:fofType)=> ((P X)->False)))->((P (E P))->False))))):Prop
% 0.48/0.70 Parameter fofType_DUMMY:fofType.
% 0.48/0.70 We need to prove ['((ex ((fofType->Prop)->fofType)) (fun (E:((fofType->Prop)->fofType))=> (forall (P:(fofType->Prop)), (((ex fofType) (fun (X:fofType)=> ((P X)->False)))->((P (E P))->False)))))']
% 0.48/0.70 Parameter fofType:Type.
% 0.48/0.70 Trying to prove ((ex ((fofType->Prop)->fofType)) (fun (E:((fofType->Prop)->fofType))=> (forall (P:(fofType->Prop)), (((ex fofType) (fun (X:fofType)=> ((P X)->False)))->((P (E P))->False)))))
% 0.48/0.70 Found fofType_DUMMY:fofType
% 0.48/0.70 Found fofType_DUMMY as proof of fofType
% 0.48/0.70 Found (classical_choice000 fofType_DUMMY) as proof of ((ex ((fofType->Prop)->fofType)) (fun (E:((fofType->Prop)->fofType))=> (forall (P:(fofType->Prop)), (((ex fofType) (fun (X:fofType)=> (not (P X))))->(not (P (E P)))))))
% 0.48/0.70 Found ((classical_choice00 (fun (x4:(fofType->Prop)) (x30:fofType)=> (not (x4 x30)))) fofType_DUMMY) as proof of ((ex ((fofType->Prop)->fofType)) (fun (E:((fofType->Prop)->fofType))=> (forall (P:(fofType->Prop)), (((ex fofType) (fun (X:fofType)=> (not (P X))))->(not (P (E P)))))))
% 0.48/0.70 Found (((classical_choice0 fofType) (fun (x4:(fofType->Prop)) (x30:fofType)=> (not (x4 x30)))) fofType_DUMMY) as proof of ((ex ((fofType->Prop)->fofType)) (fun (E:((fofType->Prop)->fofType))=> (forall (P:(fofType->Prop)), (((ex fofType) (fun (X:fofType)=> (not (P X))))->(not (P (E P)))))))
% 0.48/0.70 Found ((((classical_choice (fofType->Prop)) fofType) (fun (x4:(fofType->Prop)) (x30:fofType)=> (not (x4 x30)))) fofType_DUMMY) as proof of ((ex ((fofType->Prop)->fofType)) (fun (E:((fofType->Prop)->fofType))=> (forall (P:(fofType->Prop)), (((ex fofType) (fun (X:fofType)=> (not (P X))))->(not (P (E P)))))))
% 0.48/0.70 Found ((((classical_choice (fofType->Prop)) fofType) (fun (x4:(fofType->Prop)) (x30:fofType)=> (not (x4 x30)))) fofType_DUMMY) as proof of ((ex ((fofType->Prop)->fofType)) (fun (E:((fofType->Prop)->fofType))=> (forall (P:(fofType->Prop)), (((ex fofType) (fun (X:fofType)=> (not (P X))))->(not (P (E P)))))))
% 0.48/0.70 Found ((((classical_choice (fofType->Prop)) fofType) (fun (x4:(fofType->Prop)) (x30:fofType)=> (not (x4 x30)))) fofType_DUMMY) as proof of ((ex ((fofType->Prop)->fofType)) (fun (E:((fofType->Prop)->fofType))=> (forall (P:(fofType->Prop)), (((ex fofType) (fun (X:fofType)=> ((P X)->False)))->((P (E P))->False)))))
% 0.48/0.70 Got proof ((((classical_choice (fofType->Prop)) fofType) (fun (x4:(fofType->Prop)) (x30:fofType)=> (not (x4 x30)))) fofType_DUMMY)
% 0.48/0.70 Time elapsed = 0.088890s
% 0.48/0.70 node=12 cost=167.000000 depth=6
% 0.48/0.70 ::::::::::::::::::::::
% 0.48/0.70 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.48/0.70 % SZS output start Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.48/0.70 ((((classical_choice (fofType->Prop)) fofType) (fun (x4:(fofType->Prop)) (x30:fofType)=> (not (x4 x30)))) fofType_DUMMY)
% 0.48/0.70 % SZS output end Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------