TSTP Solution File: SYO538^1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SYO538^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 08:47:59 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.21s 0.51s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 17 ( 5 unt; 4 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 48 ( 33 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 84 ( 25 ~; 13 |; 18 &; 27 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 8 ( 8 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 7 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 28 ( 18 ^ 9 !; 1 ?; 28 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_22,type,
eps: ( $i > $o ) > $i ).
thf(decl_23,type,
if: $o > $i > $i > $i ).
thf(decl_24,type,
esk1_0: $i ).
thf(decl_25,type,
esk2_0: $i ).
thf(ifd,axiom,
( if
= ( ^ [X3: $o,X2: $i,X4: $i] :
( eps
@ ^ [X5: $i] :
( ( X3
& ( X5 = X2 ) )
| ( ~ X3
& ( X5 = X4 ) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ifd) ).
thf(conj,conjecture,
! [X2: $i,X4: $i] :
( ( ( if @ $true @ X2 @ X4 )
= X2 )
& ( ( if @ ~ $true @ X2 @ X4 )
= X4 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj) ).
thf(choiceax,axiom,
! [X1: $i > $o] :
( ? [X2: $i] : ( X1 @ X2 )
=> ( X1 @ ( eps @ X1 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',choiceax) ).
thf(c_0_3,plain,
( if
= ( ^ [Z0: $o,Z1: $i,Z2: $i] :
( eps
@ ^ [Z3: $i] :
( ( Z0
& ( Z3 = Z1 ) )
| ( ~ Z0
& Z3 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ifd]) ).
thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X2: $i,X4: $i] :
( ( ( eps
@ ^ [Z0: $i] :
( ( $true
& ( Z0 = X2 ) )
| ( ~ $true
& ( Z0 = X4 ) ) ) )
= X2 )
& ( ( eps
@ ^ [Z0: $i] :
( ( ~ $true
& ( Z0 = X2 ) )
| ( ~ ~ $true
& ( Z0 = X4 ) ) ) )
= X4 ) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj]),c_0_3]) ).
thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( ( ( eps
@ ^ [Z0: $i] :
( ( $true
& ( Z0 = esk1_0 ) )
| ( ~ $true
& ( Z0 = esk2_0 ) ) ) )
!= esk1_0 )
| ( ( eps
@ ^ [Z0: $i] :
( ( ~ $true
& ( Z0 = esk1_0 ) )
| ( ~ ~ $true
& ( Z0 = esk2_0 ) ) ) )
!= esk2_0 ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( ( ( eps
@ ^ [Z0: $i] :
( ( $true
& ( Z0 = esk1_0 ) )
| ( ~ $true
& ( Z0 = esk2_0 ) ) ) )
!= esk1_0 )
| ( ( eps
@ ^ [Z0: $i] :
( ( ~ $true
& ( Z0 = esk1_0 ) )
| ( ~ ~ $true
& ( Z0 = esk2_0 ) ) ) )
!= esk2_0 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
thf(c_0_7,plain,
! [X10: $i > $o,X11: $i] :
( ~ ( X10 @ X11 )
| ( X10 @ ( eps @ X10 ) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[choiceax])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( ( ( eps
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( Z0 = esk2_0 ) )
!= esk2_0 )
| ( ( eps
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( Z0 = esk1_0 ) )
!= esk1_0 ) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
thf(c_0_9,plain,
! [X1: $i > $o,X2: $i] :
( ( X1 @ ( eps @ X1 ) )
| ~ ( X1 @ X2 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
thf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( ( eps
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( Z0 = esk2_0 ) )
= esk2_0 ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(choice_inst,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]),c_0_8,c_0_9])]) ).
thf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( ( eps
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( Z0 = esk1_0 ) )
!= esk1_0 ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_10])]) ).
thf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(choice_inst,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]),c_0_11,c_0_9]),c_0_11])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13 % Problem : SYO538^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon May 20 11:02:08 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.50 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.51 # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 0.21/0.51 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSCSFA.
% 0.21/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting sh4l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # ehoh_best8_lambda with pid 7253 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Result found by ehoh_best8_lambda
% 0.21/0.51 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSCSFA.
% 0.21/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.51 # Search class: HHHSF-FFSF11-DSFFFMBC
% 0.21/0.51 # partial match(4): HGHSF-FFSF11-SSSFFMBN
% 0.21/0.51 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 163s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # ho_unfolding_6 with pid 7257 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Result found by ho_unfolding_6
% 0.21/0.51 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSCSFA.
% 0.21/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.51 # Search class: HHHSF-FFSF11-DSFFFMBC
% 0.21/0.51 # partial match(4): HGHSF-FFSF11-SSSFFMBN
% 0.21/0.51 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 163s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.51
% 0.21/0.51 # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.51 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.51 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.51 # Parsed axioms : 5
% 0.21/0.51 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Initial clauses : 4
% 0.21/0.51 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.21/0.51 # Initial clauses in saturation : 2
% 0.21/0.51 # Processed clauses : 4
% 0.21/0.51 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # ...remaining for further processing : 4
% 0.21/0.51 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 3
% 0.21/0.51 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.21/0.51 # Generated clauses : 11
% 0.21/0.51 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 7
% 0.21/0.51 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Paramodulations : 1
% 0.21/0.51 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Equation resolutions : 3
% 0.21/0.51 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.21/0.51 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51 # Current number of processed clauses : 3
% 0.21/0.51 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.21/0.51 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.21/0.51 # Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.21/0.51 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4
% 0.21/0.51 # ...number of literals in the above : 6
% 0.21/0.51 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.21/0.51 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.21/0.51 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.21/0.51 # Condensation attempts : 4
% 0.21/0.51 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Termbank termtop insertions : 538
% 0.21/0.51 # Search garbage collected termcells : 112
% 0.21/0.51
% 0.21/0.51 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.51 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.51 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.51 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.51 # Maximum resident set size: 1748 pages
% 0.21/0.51
% 0.21/0.51 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.51 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.51 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.51 # Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.21/0.51 # Maximum resident set size: 1712 pages
% 0.21/0.51 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.21/0.51 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------