TSTP Solution File: SYO529^1 by cocATP---0.2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : cocATP---0.2.0
% Problem : SYO529^1 : TPTP v7.5.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : python CASC.py /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 0s
% DateTime : Tue Mar 29 00:52:02 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 0.40s 0.62s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : SYO529^1 : TPTP v7.5.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : python CASC.py /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUModel : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % RAMPerCPU : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Mar 13 16:47:12 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.34 ModuleCmd_Load.c(213):ERROR:105: Unable to locate a modulefile for 'python/python27'
% 0.12/0.34 Python 2.7.5
% 0.40/0.61 Using paths ['/home/cristobal/cocATP/CASC/TPTP/', '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/', '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/']
% 0.40/0.61 FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x1cb8248>, <kernel.DependentProduct object at 0x1cb8098>) of role type named eps1
% 0.40/0.61 Using role type
% 0.40/0.61 Declaring eps1:((Prop->Prop)->Prop)
% 0.40/0.61 FOF formula (forall (P:(Prop->Prop)), (((ex Prop) (fun (X:Prop)=> (P X)))->(P (eps1 P)))) of role axiom named choiceax1
% 0.40/0.61 A new axiom: (forall (P:(Prop->Prop)), (((ex Prop) (fun (X:Prop)=> (P X)))->(P (eps1 P))))
% 0.40/0.61 FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x1cbcfc8>, <kernel.DependentProduct object at 0x1cb8098>) of role type named eps2
% 0.40/0.61 Using role type
% 0.40/0.61 Declaring eps2:((Prop->Prop)->Prop)
% 0.40/0.61 FOF formula (forall (P:(Prop->Prop)), (((ex Prop) (fun (X:Prop)=> (P X)))->(P (eps2 P)))) of role axiom named choiceax2
% 0.40/0.61 A new axiom: (forall (P:(Prop->Prop)), (((ex Prop) (fun (X:Prop)=> (P X)))->(P (eps2 P))))
% 0.40/0.61 FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x1cb8878>, <kernel.DependentProduct object at 0x1cb8128>) of role type named eps3
% 0.40/0.61 Using role type
% 0.40/0.61 Declaring eps3:((Prop->Prop)->Prop)
% 0.40/0.61 FOF formula (forall (P:(Prop->Prop)), (((ex Prop) (fun (X:Prop)=> (P X)))->(P (eps3 P)))) of role axiom named choiceax3
% 0.40/0.61 A new axiom: (forall (P:(Prop->Prop)), (((ex Prop) (fun (X:Prop)=> (P X)))->(P (eps3 P))))
% 0.40/0.61 FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x1cb8bd8>, <kernel.DependentProduct object at 0x2b3e28475fc8>) of role type named eps4
% 0.40/0.61 Using role type
% 0.40/0.61 Declaring eps4:((Prop->Prop)->Prop)
% 0.40/0.61 FOF formula (forall (P:(Prop->Prop)), (((ex Prop) (fun (X:Prop)=> (P X)))->(P (eps4 P)))) of role axiom named choiceax4
% 0.40/0.61 A new axiom: (forall (P:(Prop->Prop)), (((ex Prop) (fun (X:Prop)=> (P X)))->(P (eps4 P))))
% 0.40/0.61 FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x1cb8518>, <kernel.DependentProduct object at 0x2b3e28475ef0>) of role type named eps5
% 0.40/0.61 Using role type
% 0.40/0.61 Declaring eps5:((Prop->Prop)->Prop)
% 0.40/0.61 FOF formula (forall (P:(Prop->Prop)), (((ex Prop) (fun (X:Prop)=> (P X)))->(P (eps5 P)))) of role axiom named choiceax5
% 0.40/0.61 A new axiom: (forall (P:(Prop->Prop)), (((ex Prop) (fun (X:Prop)=> (P X)))->(P (eps5 P))))
% 0.40/0.61 FOF formula (not (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps1) eps2)) of role axiom named choiceax12
% 0.40/0.61 A new axiom: (not (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps1) eps2))
% 0.40/0.61 FOF formula (not (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps1) eps3)) of role axiom named choiceax13
% 0.40/0.61 A new axiom: (not (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps1) eps3))
% 0.40/0.61 FOF formula (not (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps1) eps4)) of role axiom named choiceax14
% 0.40/0.61 A new axiom: (not (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps1) eps4))
% 0.40/0.61 FOF formula (not (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps1) eps5)) of role axiom named choiceax15
% 0.40/0.61 A new axiom: (not (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps1) eps5))
% 0.40/0.61 FOF formula (not (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps2) eps3)) of role axiom named choiceax23
% 0.40/0.61 A new axiom: (not (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps2) eps3))
% 0.40/0.61 FOF formula (not (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps2) eps4)) of role axiom named choiceax24
% 0.40/0.61 A new axiom: (not (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps2) eps4))
% 0.40/0.61 FOF formula (not (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps2) eps5)) of role axiom named choiceax25
% 0.40/0.61 A new axiom: (not (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps2) eps5))
% 0.40/0.61 FOF formula (not (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps3) eps4)) of role axiom named choiceax34
% 0.40/0.61 A new axiom: (not (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps3) eps4))
% 0.40/0.61 FOF formula (not (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps3) eps5)) of role axiom named choiceax35
% 0.40/0.61 A new axiom: (not (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps3) eps5))
% 0.40/0.61 FOF formula (not (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps4) eps5)) of role axiom named choiceax45
% 0.40/0.61 A new axiom: (not (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps4) eps5))
% 0.40/0.61 We need to prove []
% 0.40/0.61 Parameter eps1:((Prop->Prop)->Prop).
% 0.40/0.61 Axiom choiceax1:(forall (P:(Prop->Prop)), (((ex Prop) (fun (X:Prop)=> (P X)))->(P (eps1 P)))).
% 0.40/0.61 Parameter eps2:((Prop->Prop)->Prop).
% 0.40/0.61 Axiom choiceax2:(forall (P:(Prop->Prop)), (((ex Prop) (fun (X:Prop)=> (P X)))->(P (eps2 P)))).
% 0.40/0.61 Parameter eps3:((Prop->Prop)->Prop).
% 0.40/0.61 Axiom choiceax3:(forall (P:(Prop->Prop)), (((ex Prop) (fun (X:Prop)=> (P X)))->(P (eps3 P)))).
% 0.40/0.61 Parameter eps4:((Prop->Prop)->Prop).
% 0.40/0.61 Axiom choiceax4:(forall (P:(Prop->Prop)), (((ex Prop) (fun (X:Prop)=> (P X)))->(P (eps4 P)))).
% 0.40/0.62 Parameter eps5:((Prop->Prop)->Prop).
% 0.40/0.62 Axiom choiceax5:(forall (P:(Prop->Prop)), (((ex Prop) (fun (X:Prop)=> (P X)))->(P (eps5 P)))).
% 0.40/0.62 Axiom choiceax12:(not (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps1) eps2)).
% 0.40/0.62 Axiom choiceax13:(not (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps1) eps3)).
% 0.40/0.62 Axiom choiceax14:(not (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps1) eps4)).
% 0.40/0.62 Axiom choiceax15:(not (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps1) eps5)).
% 0.40/0.62 Axiom choiceax23:(not (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps2) eps3)).
% 0.40/0.62 Axiom choiceax24:(not (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps2) eps4)).
% 0.40/0.62 Axiom choiceax25:(not (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps2) eps5)).
% 0.40/0.62 Axiom choiceax34:(not (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps3) eps4)).
% 0.40/0.62 Axiom choiceax35:(not (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps3) eps5)).
% 0.40/0.62 Axiom choiceax45:(not (((eq ((Prop->Prop)->Prop)) eps4) eps5)).
% 0.40/0.62 There are no conjectures!
% 0.40/0.62 Adding conjecture False, to look for Unsatisfiability
% 0.40/0.62 Trying to prove False
% 0.40/0.62 % SZS status GaveUp for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------