TSTP Solution File: SYO524_1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SYO524_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 11:18:05 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.07s 1.84s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.07s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   16
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   39 (  29 unt;   6 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   38 (  11 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   28 (  23   ~;   3   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number arithmetic     :  100 (  26 atm;  17 fun;  50 num;   7 var)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr;   1 ari)
%            Number of type conns  :    1 (   1   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   14 (   6 usr;  12 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    7 (;   7   !;   0   ?;   7   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ #nlpp > f

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:
tff('#skE_2',type,
    '#skE_2': $int ).

tff('#skE_1',type,
    '#skE_1': $int ).

tff('#skE_5',type,
    '#skE_5': $int ).

tff('#skE_4',type,
    '#skE_4': $int ).

tff('#skE_3',type,
    '#skE_3': $int ).

%Foreground operators:
tff(f,type,
    f: $int > $int ).

tff(f_35,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( ! [Ua: $int] : $lesseq(f($sum(Ua,1)),f($sum(Ua,2)))
        & $lesseq(f(7),3) )
     => $lesseq(f(4),3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ~ $lesseq(f(4),3),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_35]) ).

tff(c_15,plain,
    $less(3,f(4)),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LRFIA')],[c_2]) ).

tff(c_32,plain,
    f(4) = '#skE_2',
    inference(define,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_15]) ).

tff(c_5,plain,
    $lesseq(f(7),3),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_35]) ).

tff(c_14,plain,
    ~ $less(3,f(7)),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LRFIA')],[c_5]) ).

tff(c_21,plain,
    f(7) = '#skE_1',
    inference(define,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_14]) ).

tff(c_8,plain,
    ! [U_1a: $int] : $lesseq(f($sum(1,U_1a)),f($sum(2,U_1a))),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_35]) ).

tff(c_40,plain,
    ! [U_8a: $int] : ~ $less(f($sum(2,U_8a)),f($sum(1,U_8a))),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LRFIA')],[c_8]) ).

tff(c_69,plain,
    ! [U_8a: $int] :
      ( ~ $less('#skE_1',f($sum(1,U_8a)))
      | ( $sum(2,U_8a) != 7 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_21,c_40]) ).

tff(c_71,plain,
    ~ $less('#skE_1',f($sum(1,5))),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_69]) ).

tff(c_74,plain,
    ~ $less('#skE_1',f(6)),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_71]) ).

tff(c_122,plain,
    f(6) = '#skE_4',
    inference(define,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_74]) ).

tff(c_13,plain,
    ! [U_1a: $int] : ~ $less(f($sum(2,U_1a)),f($sum(1,U_1a))),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LRFIA')],[c_8]) ).

tff(c_136,plain,
    ! [U_1a: $int] :
      ( ~ $less('#skE_4',f($sum(1,U_1a)))
      | ( $sum(2,U_1a) != 6 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_122,c_13]) ).

tff(c_138,plain,
    ~ $less('#skE_4',f($sum(1,4))),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_136]) ).

tff(c_141,plain,
    ~ $less('#skE_4',f(5)),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_138]) ).

tff(c_157,plain,
    f(5) = '#skE_5',
    inference(define,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_141]) ).

tff(c_171,plain,
    ! [U_1a: $int] :
      ( ~ $less('#skE_5',f($sum(1,U_1a)))
      | ( $sum(2,U_1a) != 5 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_157,c_13]) ).

tff(c_173,plain,
    ~ $less('#skE_5',f($sum(1,3))),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_171]) ).

tff(c_176,plain,
    ~ $less('#skE_5',f(4)),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_173]) ).

tff(c_189,plain,
    ~ $less('#skE_5','#skE_2'),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_32,c_176]) ).

tff(c_154,plain,
    f(5) = '#skE_5',
    inference(define,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_141]) ).

tff(c_153,plain,
    ~ $less('#skE_4',f(5)),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_138]) ).

tff(c_158,plain,
    ~ $less('#skE_4','#skE_5'),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_154,c_153]) ).

tff(c_119,plain,
    f(6) = '#skE_4',
    inference(define,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_74]) ).

tff(c_118,plain,
    ~ $less('#skE_1',f(6)),
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_71]) ).

tff(c_123,plain,
    ~ $less('#skE_1','#skE_4'),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_119,c_118]) ).

tff(c_29,plain,
    f(4) = '#skE_2',
    inference(define,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_15]) ).

tff(c_33,plain,
    $less(3,'#skE_2'),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_29,c_15]) ).

tff(c_18,plain,
    f(7) = '#skE_1',
    inference(define,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_14]) ).

tff(c_22,plain,
    ~ $less(3,'#skE_1'),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_18,c_14]) ).

tff(c_190,plain,
    $false,
    inference(close,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_189,c_158,c_123,c_33,c_22]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14  % Problem  : SYO524_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 15:59:46 EDT 2023
% 0.21/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.07/1.84  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.07/1.85  
% 3.07/1.85  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.07/1.88  
% 3.07/1.88  Inference rules
% 3.07/1.88  ----------------------
% 3.07/1.88  #Ref     : 0
% 3.07/1.88  #Sup     : 20
% 3.07/1.88  #Fact    : 0
% 3.07/1.88  #Define  : 5
% 3.07/1.88  #Split   : 0
% 3.07/1.88  #Chain   : 0
% 3.07/1.88  #Close   : 1
% 3.07/1.88  
% 3.07/1.88  Ordering : LPO
% 3.07/1.88  
% 3.07/1.88  Simplification rules
% 3.07/1.88  ----------------------
% 3.07/1.88  #Subsume      : 3
% 3.07/1.88  #Demod        : 9
% 3.07/1.88  #Tautology    : 10
% 3.07/1.88  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 3.07/1.88  #BackRed      : 0
% 3.07/1.88  
% 3.07/1.88  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.07/1.88  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.07/1.88  
% 3.07/1.88  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.07/1.88  ----------------------
% 3.07/1.88  Preprocessing        : 0.48
% 3.07/1.88  Parsing              : 0.26
% 3.07/1.88  CNF conversion       : 0.02
% 3.07/1.88  Main loop            : 0.25
% 3.07/1.88  Inferencing          : 0.05
% 3.07/1.88  Reduction            : 0.05
% 3.07/1.88  Demodulation         : 0.04
% 3.07/1.88  BG Simplification    : 0.03
% 3.07/1.88  Subsumption          : 0.04
% 3.07/1.88  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 3.07/1.88  MUC search           : 0.01
% 3.07/1.88  Cooper               : 0.05
% 3.07/1.88  Total                : 0.78
% 3.07/1.88  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.07/1.88  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.07/1.88  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.07/1.88  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------