TSTP Solution File: SYO506_8 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : SYO506_8 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 08:52:33 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.16s 0.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.10 % Problem : SYO506_8 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.0.0.
% 0.05/0.11 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Mon May 20 09:33:37 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.42 Running first-order model finding
% 0.16/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/0.43 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.16/0.43 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # new_bool_3 with pid 11098 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.16/0.43 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/0.43 # Search class: FHHPS-FFSF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.43 # partial match(2): FHUNS-FFSF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.43 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 150s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 11102 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.16/0.43 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/0.43 # Search class: FHHPS-FFSF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.43 # partial match(2): FHUNS-FFSF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.43 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 150s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.16/0.43 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.16/0.43
% 0.16/0.43 # Proof found!
% 0.16/0.43 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.16/0.43 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.16/0.43 tff(decl_22, type, c: ($o * $i * $i) > $i).
% 0.16/0.43 tff(decl_23, type, esk1_0: $i).
% 0.16/0.43 tff(decl_24, type, esk2_0: $i).
% 0.16/0.43 fof(claim, conjecture, (![X1, X2]:(c(X1=X2,X1,X2)=X2)|~(![X1, X2]:(c($true,X1,X2)=X1))|~(![X1, X2]:(c($false,X1,X2)=X2))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', claim)).
% 0.16/0.43 fof(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~((![X1, X2]:(((X1!=X2|c($true,X1,X2)=X2)&(X1=X2|c($false,X1,X2)=X2)))|~(![X1, X2]:(c($true,X1,X2)=X1))|~(![X1, X2]:(c($false,X1,X2)=X2)))), inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[claim])])).
% 0.16/0.43 fof(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X5, X6, X7, X8]:((((((esk1_0!=esk2_0|esk1_0=esk2_0)&(c($false,esk1_0,esk2_0)!=esk2_0|esk1_0=esk2_0))&((esk1_0!=esk2_0|c($true,esk1_0,esk2_0)!=esk2_0)&(c($false,esk1_0,esk2_0)!=esk2_0|c($true,esk1_0,esk2_0)!=esk2_0)))&c($true,X5,X6)=X5)&c($false,X7,X8)=X8)), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])])).
% 0.16/0.43 cnf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, (esk1_0!=esk2_0|c($true,esk1_0,esk2_0)!=esk2_0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
% 0.16/0.43 cnf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, (c($true,X1,X2)=X1), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
% 0.16/0.43 cnf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, (esk1_0=esk2_0|c($false,esk1_0,esk2_0)!=esk2_0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
% 0.16/0.43 cnf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, (c($false,X1,X2)=X2), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
% 0.16/0.43 cnf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, (esk1_0!=esk2_0), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_4])])).
% 0.16/0.43 cnf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_6])]), c_0_7]), ['proof']).
% 0.16/0.43 # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.16/0.43 # Parsed axioms : 2
% 0.16/0.43 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1
% 0.16/0.43 # Initial clauses : 6
% 0.16/0.43 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.16/0.43 # Initial clauses in saturation : 5
% 0.16/0.43 # Processed clauses : 7
% 0.16/0.43 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.16/0.43 # ...remaining for further processing : 6
% 0.16/0.43 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.16/0.43 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2
% 0.16/0.43 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # NegExts : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Total rewrite steps : 3
% 0.16/0.43 # ...of those cached : 1
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.43 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.43 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.43 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.43 # Current number of processed clauses : 3
% 0.16/0.43 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.16/0.43 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.16/0.43 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.16/0.43 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 0.16/0.43 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2
% 0.16/0.43 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.16/0.43 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.16/0.43 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.16/0.43 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.16/0.43 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Termbank termtop insertions : 259
% 0.16/0.43 # Search garbage collected termcells : 76
% 0.16/0.43
% 0.16/0.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.43 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.16/0.43 # System time : 0.000 s
% 0.16/0.43 # Total time : 0.003 s
% 0.16/0.43 # Maximum resident set size: 1784 pages
% 0.16/0.43
% 0.16/0.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.43 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.16/0.43 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.16/0.43 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.16/0.43 # Maximum resident set size: 1692 pages
% 0.16/0.43 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------