TSTP Solution File: SYO501_8 by E-SAT---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem  : SYO501_8 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 08:52:32 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.54s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem    : SYO501_8 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.0.0.
% 0.13/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime   : Mon May 20 10:25:53 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.53  Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.53  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.54  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.21/0.54  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.54  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.54  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.54  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.54  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.54  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.54  # new_bool_3 with pid 15106 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.21/0.54  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.54  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.54  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.54  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.54  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.54  # Search class: FGHNF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.54  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.54  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.54  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 15109 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.21/0.54  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.54  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.54  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.54  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.54  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.54  # Search class: FGHNF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.54  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.54  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.54  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.54  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.54  
% 0.21/0.54  # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.54  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.54  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.21/0.54  tff(decl_22, type, x: $i).
% 0.21/0.54  tff(decl_23, type, y: $o).
% 0.21/0.54  tff(decl_24, type, f: ($i * $o) > $i).
% 0.21/0.54  tff(decl_25, type, p: $i > $o).
% 0.21/0.54  fof(claim, conjecture, (~(p(f(x,~(~(y)))))|p(f(x,y))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', claim)).
% 0.21/0.54  fof(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~((~(((~y|p(f(x,$true)))&(y|p(f(x,$false)))))|((~y|p(f(x,$true)))&(y|p(f(x,$false)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[claim])])])).
% 0.21/0.54  fof(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, (((~y|p(f(x,$true)))&(y|p(f(x,$false))))&(((~y|y)&(~p(f(x,$false))|y))&((~y|~p(f(x,$true)))&(~p(f(x,$false))|~p(f(x,$true)))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])).
% 0.21/0.54  cnf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, (y|~p(f(x,$false))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
% 0.21/0.54  cnf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, (y|p(f(x,$false))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
% 0.21/0.54  cnf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, (~y|~p(f(x,$true))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
% 0.21/0.54  cnf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, (y), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_4])).
% 0.21/0.54  cnf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, (p(f(x,$true))|~y), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
% 0.21/0.54  cnf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, (~p(f(x,$true))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_6])])).
% 0.21/0.54  cnf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_6])]), c_0_8]), ['proof']).
% 0.21/0.54  # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.21/0.54  # Parsed axioms                        : 5
% 0.21/0.54  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 4
% 0.21/0.54  # Initial clauses                      : 6
% 0.21/0.54  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
% 0.21/0.54  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 5
% 0.21/0.54  # Processed clauses                    : 6
% 0.21/0.54  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # ...subsumed                          : 1
% 0.21/0.54  # ...remaining for further processing  : 4
% 0.21/0.54  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 0.21/0.54  # Generated clauses                    : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.21/0.54  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.21/0.54  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Total rewrite steps                  : 3
% 0.21/0.54  # ...of those cached                   : 2
% 0.21/0.54  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.21/0.54  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.21/0.54  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.54  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.21/0.54  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.54  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.21/0.54  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.21/0.54  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.21/0.54  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.21/0.54  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.21/0.54  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.21/0.54  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.21/0.54  # Current number of processed clauses  : 2
% 0.21/0.54  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1
% 0.21/0.54  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.54  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.21/0.54  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.54  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Current number of archived clauses   : 2
% 0.21/0.54  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
% 0.21/0.54  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.21/0.54  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1
% 0.21/0.54  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.21/0.54  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.21/0.54  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 259
% 0.21/0.54  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 32
% 0.21/0.54  
% 0.21/0.54  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.54  # User time                : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.54  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.54  # Total time               : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.54  # Maximum resident set size: 1624 pages
% 0.21/0.54  
% 0.21/0.54  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.54  # User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.54  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.54  # Total time               : 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.54  # Maximum resident set size: 1684 pages
% 0.21/0.54  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------