TSTP Solution File: SYO373^5 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SYO373^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 08:45:47 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.47s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 17 ( 4 unt; 5 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 32 ( 1 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 8 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 48 ( 10 ~; 4 |; 3 &; 24 @)
% ( 2 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 1 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 1 usr)
% Number of type conns : 8 ( 8 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 6 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 0 ^ 7 !; 0 ?; 7 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
b: $tType ).
thf(decl_22,type,
g: b > $o ).
thf(decl_23,type,
f: b > $o ).
thf(decl_24,type,
epred1_0: ( b > $o ) > $o ).
thf(decl_25,type,
esk1_0: b ).
thf(cEXT_SET,conjecture,
( ! [X1: b] :
( ( f @ X1 )
<=> ( g @ X1 ) )
=> ! [X2: ( b > $o ) > $o] :
( ( X2 @ f )
=> ( X2 @ g ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cEXT_SET) ).
thf(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ! [X1: b] :
( ( f @ X1 )
<=> ( g @ X1 ) )
=> ! [X2: ( b > $o ) > $o] :
( ( X2 @ f )
=> ( X2 @ g ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cEXT_SET]) ).
thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
! [X5: b] :
( ( ~ ( f @ X5 )
| ( g @ X5 ) )
& ( ~ ( g @ X5 )
| ( f @ X5 ) )
& ( epred1_0 @ f )
& ~ ( epred1_0 @ g ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ( epred1_0 @ g ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
epred1_0 @ f,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_5,plain,
f != g,
inference(ext_sup,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]) ).
thf(c_0_6,plain,
( ( f @ esk1_0 )
<~> ( g @ esk1_0 ) ),
inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: b] :
( ( g @ X1 )
| ~ ( f @ X1 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_8,plain,
~ ( f @ esk1_0 ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]),c_0_7]) ).
thf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: b] :
( ( f @ X1 )
| ~ ( g @ X1 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ ( g @ esk1_0 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
thf(c_0_11,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]),c_0_8]),c_0_10]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SYO373^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Mon May 20 10:39:53 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.46 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.47 # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 0.19/0.47 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA.
% 0.19/0.47 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.47 # Starting sh2lt with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.19/0.47 # Starting new_ho_10_unif with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47 # Starting full_lambda_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47 # Starting ehoh_best3_rw with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47 # new_ho_10_unif with pid 13820 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Result found by new_ho_10_unif
% 0.19/0.47 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA.
% 0.19/0.47 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.47 # Starting sh2lt with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.19/0.47 # Starting new_ho_10_unif with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.47 # Search class: HHUNF-FFSF00-SHHFFFNN
% 0.19/0.47 # partial match(2): HHUNF-FFSF00-SSSFFFNN
% 0.19/0.47 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.47 # Starting sh3 with 163s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47 # sh3 with pid 13829 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Result found by sh3
% 0.19/0.47 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA.
% 0.19/0.47 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.47 # Starting sh2lt with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.19/0.47 # Starting new_ho_10_unif with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.47 # Search class: HHUNF-FFSF00-SHHFFFNN
% 0.19/0.47 # partial match(2): HHUNF-FFSF00-SSSFFFNN
% 0.19/0.47 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.47 # Starting sh3 with 163s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.47 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.47
% 0.19/0.47 # Proof found!
% 0.19/0.47 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.47 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.47 # Parsed axioms : 4
% 0.19/0.47 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Initial clauses : 7
% 0.19/0.47 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 3
% 0.19/0.47 # Initial clauses in saturation : 4
% 0.19/0.47 # Processed clauses : 13
% 0.19/0.47 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # ...remaining for further processing : 12
% 0.19/0.47 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Generated clauses : 6
% 0.19/0.47 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 5
% 0.19/0.47 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.19/0.47 # Paramodulations : 2
% 0.19/0.47 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # NegExts : 1
% 0.19/0.47 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.47 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.47 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.47 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.47 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.47 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.47 # Current number of processed clauses : 7
% 0.19/0.47 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.19/0.47 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Negative unit clauses : 4
% 0.19/0.47 # Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 0.19/0.47 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.47 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Current number of archived clauses : 5
% 0.19/0.47 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
% 0.19/0.47 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.19/0.47 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.19/0.47 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.19/0.47 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.19/0.47 # Termbank termtop insertions : 402
% 0.19/0.47 # Search garbage collected termcells : 89
% 0.19/0.47
% 0.19/0.47 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.47 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.19/0.47 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.47 # Total time : 0.003 s
% 0.19/0.47 # Maximum resident set size: 1776 pages
% 0.19/0.47
% 0.19/0.47 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.47 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.19/0.47 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.19/0.47 # Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.19/0.47 # Maximum resident set size: 1712 pages
% 0.19/0.47 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.19/0.47 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------