TSTP Solution File: SYO369_8 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : SYO369_8 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 08:51:25 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.12s 0.37s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.07 % Problem : SYO369_8 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.08/0.27 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.27 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.27 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.27 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.27 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.27 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.27 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.27 % DateTime : Mon May 20 10:14:52 EDT 2024
% 0.08/0.27 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.36 Running first-order model finding
% 0.12/0.36 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.37 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.12/0.37 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.37 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.37 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.37 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.37 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.37 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.37 # sh5l with pid 12393 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.37 # Result found by sh5l
% 0.12/0.37 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.37 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.37 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.37 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.37 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.37 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.37 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.12/0.37 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.37 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.12/0.37 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.37 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 12396 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.37 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.12/0.37 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.37 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.37 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.37 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.37 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.37 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.37 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.12/0.37 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.37 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.12/0.37 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.37 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.12/0.37 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 # Proof found!
% 0.12/0.37 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.12/0.37 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.12/0.37 tff(decl_22, type, cB: $o).
% 0.12/0.37 tff(decl_23, type, cA: $o).
% 0.12/0.37 tff(decl_24, type, cP: $o > $o).
% 0.12/0.37 fof(cTRIVEXT5, conjecture, (cP((cA=>cB))=>cP((~(cA)|cB))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cTRIVEXT5)).
% 0.12/0.37 fof(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~((((~((cA=>cB))|cP($true))&((cA=>cB)|cP($false)))=>((~((~cA|cB))|cP($true))&(~cA|cB|cP($false))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTRIVEXT5])])])).
% 0.12/0.37 fof(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ((((cA|cP($true))&(~cB|cP($true)))&(~cA|cB|cP($false)))&((((cA|(~cA|cB))&(~cB|(~cA|cB)))&(~cP($false)|(~cA|cB)))&(((cA|~cP($true))&(~cB|~cP($true)))&(~cP($false)|~cP($true))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, (cA|~cP($true)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, (cA|cP($true)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, (cP($true)|~cB), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, (~cB|~cP($true)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, (cB|cP($false)|~cA), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, (cA), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_4])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, (~cB), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_6])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, (cB|~cP($false)|~cA), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, (cP($false)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_8])]), c_0_9])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_8]), c_0_11])]), c_0_9]), ['proof']).
% 0.12/0.37 # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.12/0.37 # Parsed axioms : 4
% 0.12/0.37 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 3
% 0.12/0.37 # Initial clauses : 9
% 0.12/0.37 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.12/0.37 # Initial clauses in saturation : 7
% 0.12/0.37 # Processed clauses : 7
% 0.12/0.37 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.12/0.37 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.12/0.37 # ...remaining for further processing : 6
% 0.12/0.37 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.12/0.37 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.12/0.37 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.12/0.37 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.12/0.37 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.12/0.37 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.12/0.37 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.12/0.37 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% 0.12/0.37 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.12/0.37 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.12/0.37 # NegExts : 0
% 0.12/0.37 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.12/0.37 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.12/0.37 # Total rewrite steps : 5
% 0.12/0.37 # ...of those cached : 3
% 0.12/0.37 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.12/0.37 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.12/0.37 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.12/0.37 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.12/0.37 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.12/0.37 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.12/0.37 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.37 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.37 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.37 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.37 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.37 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.37 # Current number of processed clauses : 3
% 0.12/0.37 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.12/0.37 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.12/0.37 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.12/0.37 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.12/0.37 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.12/0.37 # ...number of literals in the above : 1
% 0.12/0.37 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.12/0.37 # Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 0.12/0.37 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2
% 0.12/0.37 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.12/0.37 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 0.12/0.37 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.12/0.37 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.12/0.37 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.12/0.37 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.12/0.37 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.12/0.37 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.12/0.37 # Termbank termtop insertions : 375
% 0.12/0.37 # Search garbage collected termcells : 63
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.37 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.12/0.37 # System time : 0.000 s
% 0.12/0.37 # Total time : 0.003 s
% 0.12/0.37 # Maximum resident set size: 1604 pages
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.37 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.12/0.37 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.12/0.37 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.12/0.37 # Maximum resident set size: 1684 pages
% 0.12/0.37 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------