TSTP Solution File: SYO366^5 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SYO366^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 08:45:44 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.18s 0.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 7 ( 4 unt; 2 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 9 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 7 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 0 &; 2 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 1 ( 1 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 4 ( 2 usr; 3 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 ^ 0 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_22,type,
cP: $o > $o ).
thf(decl_23,type,
cA: $o ).
thf(cTRIVEXT4,conjecture,
( ( cP
@ ( cA
=> cA ) )
=> ( cP @ $true ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cTRIVEXT4) ).
thf(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ $true,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTRIVEXT4])])]) ).
thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ $true,
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1]) ).
thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ $true,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.10 % Problem : SYO366^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.09/0.11 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Mon May 20 08:49:52 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.42 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.18/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.43 # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 0.18/0.43 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.43 # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.43 # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.43 # Starting sh4l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.43 # Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_rwall with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.43 # sh4l with pid 22411 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.43 # Result found by sh4l
% 0.18/0.43 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.43 # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.43 # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.43 # Starting sh4l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.43 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.18/0.43 # Search class: HUHPF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.43 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.18/0.43 # Starting new_ho_10 with 181s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.43 # new_ho_10 with pid 22416 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.43 # Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.18/0.43 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.43 # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.43 # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.43 # Starting sh4l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.43 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.18/0.43 # Search class: HUHPF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.43 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.18/0.43 # Starting new_ho_10 with 181s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.43 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.18/0.43 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.18/0.43
% 0.18/0.43 # Proof found!
% 0.18/0.43 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.43 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.43 # Parsed axioms : 3
% 0.18/0.43 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.18/0.43 # Initial clauses : 3
% 0.18/0.43 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.18/0.43 # Initial clauses in saturation : 1
% 0.18/0.43 # Processed clauses : 1
% 0.18/0.43 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.18/0.43 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.43 # ...remaining for further processing : 0
% 0.18/0.43 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.18/0.43 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.18/0.43 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.43 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.18/0.43 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.43 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.18/0.43 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.43 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.18/0.43 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.18/0.43 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.18/0.43 # NegExts : 0
% 0.18/0.43 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.18/0.43 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.18/0.43 # Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.18/0.43 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.18/0.43 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.18/0.43 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.18/0.43 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.18/0.43 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.43 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.18/0.43 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.18/0.43 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.43 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.43 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.43 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.43 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.43 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.43 # Current number of processed clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.43 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.43 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.18/0.43 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.43 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.43 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.18/0.43 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.18/0.43 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.18/0.43 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.43 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.18/0.43 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.18/0.43 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.18/0.43 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.18/0.43 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.18/0.43 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.18/0.43 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.18/0.43 # Condensation attempts : 1
% 0.18/0.43 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.18/0.43 # Termbank termtop insertions : 97
% 0.18/0.43 # Search garbage collected termcells : 21
% 0.18/0.43
% 0.18/0.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.43 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.18/0.43 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.18/0.43 # Total time : 0.002 s
% 0.18/0.43 # Maximum resident set size: 1624 pages
% 0.18/0.43
% 0.18/0.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.43 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.18/0.43 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.18/0.43 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.18/0.43 # Maximum resident set size: 1688 pages
% 0.18/0.43 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.18/0.43 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------