TSTP Solution File: SYO355^5 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SYO355^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 09:04:07 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.25s 0.41s
% Output : Refutation 0.25s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SYO355^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.16 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.39 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.39 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.39 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.39 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.39 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.39 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.39 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.39 % DateTime : Mon May 20 09:59:08 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.39 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.39 This is a TH0_THM_EQU_NAR problem
% 0.15/0.39 Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/0.41 % (27525)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 0.25/0.41 % (27529)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 0.25/0.41 % (27527)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.25/0.41 % (27524)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 0.25/0.41 % (27526)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 0.25/0.41 % (27528)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.25/0.41 % (27532)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/3Mi)
% 0.25/0.41 % (27530)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 0.25/0.41 % (27529)First to succeed.
% 0.25/0.41 % (27527)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.25/0.41 % (27526)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.25/0.41 % (27529)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.25/0.41 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.25/0.41 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.25/0.41 thf(func_def_2, type, sK0: $i > $i).
% 0.25/0.41 thf(func_def_3, type, sK1: $i > $i).
% 0.25/0.41 thf(func_def_5, type, ph3: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 0.25/0.41 thf(f12,plain,(
% 0.25/0.41 $false),
% 0.25/0.41 inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f11,f9])).
% 0.25/0.41 thf(f9,plain,(
% 0.25/0.41 ( ! [X2 : $i,X3 : $i] : ((X2 = X3)) )),
% 0.25/0.41 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8])).
% 0.25/0.41 thf(f8,plain,(
% 0.25/0.41 (sK0 != sK1) & ! [X2,X3] : (X2 = X3)),
% 0.25/0.41 inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f6,f7])).
% 0.25/0.41 thf(f7,plain,(
% 0.25/0.41 ? [X0 : $i > $i,X1 : $i > $i] : (X0 != X1) => (sK0 != sK1)),
% 0.25/0.41 introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
% 0.25/0.41 thf(f6,plain,(
% 0.25/0.41 ? [X0 : $i > $i,X1 : $i > $i] : (X0 != X1) & ! [X2,X3] : (X2 = X3)),
% 0.25/0.41 inference(rectify,[],[f5])).
% 0.25/0.41 thf(f5,plain,(
% 0.25/0.41 ? [X3 : $i > $i,X2 : $i > $i] : (X2 != X3) & ! [X1,X0] : (X0 = X1)),
% 0.25/0.41 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f4])).
% 0.25/0.41 thf(f4,plain,(
% 0.25/0.41 ~(! [X1,X0] : (X0 = X1) => ! [X3 : $i > $i,X2 : $i > $i] : (X2 = X3))),
% 0.25/0.41 inference(rectify,[],[f2])).
% 0.25/0.41 thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.25/0.41 ~(! [X1,X0] : (X0 = X1) => ! [X3 : $i > $i,X2 : $i > $i] : (X2 = X3))),
% 0.25/0.41 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1])).
% 0.25/0.41 thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 0.25/0.41 ! [X1,X0] : (X0 = X1) => ! [X3 : $i > $i,X2 : $i > $i] : (X2 = X3)),
% 0.25/0.41 file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cTHM613)).
% 0.25/0.41 thf(f11,plain,(
% 0.25/0.41 ((sK1 @ sK4) != (sK0 @ sK4))),
% 0.25/0.41 inference(negative_extensionality,[],[f10])).
% 0.25/0.41 thf(f10,plain,(
% 0.25/0.41 (sK0 != sK1)),
% 0.25/0.41 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8])).
% 0.25/0.41 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.25/0.41 % (27529)------------------------------
% 0.25/0.41 % (27529)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.25/0.41 % (27529)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.25/0.41
% 0.25/0.41 % (27529)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.25/0.41 % (27529)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.25/0.41 % (27529)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.25/0.41 % (27529)------------------------------
% 0.25/0.41 % (27529)------------------------------
% 0.25/0.41 % (27523)Success in time 0.006 s
% 0.25/0.41 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------