TSTP Solution File: SYO350^5 by cocATP---0.2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : cocATP---0.2.0
% Problem  : SYO350^5 : TPTP v7.5.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python CASC.py /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 0s
% DateTime : Tue Mar 29 00:51:13 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.61s 0.80s
% Output   : Proof 0.61s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem    : SYO350^5 : TPTP v7.5.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command    : python CASC.py /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer   : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model      : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUModel   : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % RAMPerCPU  : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS         : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Sat Mar 12 06:17:04 EST 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.12/0.34  ModuleCmd_Load.c(213):ERROR:105: Unable to locate a modulefile for 'python/python27'
% 0.12/0.35  Python 2.7.5
% 0.61/0.80  Using paths ['/home/cristobal/cocATP/CASC/TPTP/', '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/', '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/']
% 0.61/0.80  FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x1e05518>, <kernel.DependentProduct object at 0x2b13d835dcb0>) of role type named g
% 0.61/0.80  Using role type
% 0.61/0.80  Declaring g:(fofType->fofType)
% 0.61/0.80  FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x1e09e60>, <kernel.DependentProduct object at 0x1e053f8>) of role type named p
% 0.61/0.80  Using role type
% 0.61/0.80  Declaring p:((fofType->fofType)->Prop)
% 0.61/0.80  FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x1e05518>, <kernel.DependentProduct object at 0x2b13d835d908>) of role type named f
% 0.61/0.80  Using role type
% 0.61/0.80  Declaring f:(fofType->fofType)
% 0.61/0.80  FOF formula ((forall (X:fofType), (((eq fofType) (f X)) (g X)))->((p f)->(p g))) of role conjecture named cE1FUNC
% 0.61/0.80  Conjecture to prove = ((forall (X:fofType), (((eq fofType) (f X)) (g X)))->((p f)->(p g))):Prop
% 0.61/0.80  Parameter fofType_DUMMY:fofType.
% 0.61/0.80  We need to prove ['((forall (X:fofType), (((eq fofType) (f X)) (g X)))->((p f)->(p g)))']
% 0.61/0.80  Parameter fofType:Type.
% 0.61/0.80  Parameter g:(fofType->fofType).
% 0.61/0.80  Parameter p:((fofType->fofType)->Prop).
% 0.61/0.80  Parameter f:(fofType->fofType).
% 0.61/0.80  Trying to prove ((forall (X:fofType), (((eq fofType) (f X)) (g X)))->((p f)->(p g)))
% 0.61/0.80  Found functional_extensionality000000:=(functional_extensionality00000 p):((p f)->(p g))
% 0.61/0.80  Found (functional_extensionality00000 p) as proof of ((p f)->(p g))
% 0.61/0.80  Found ((functional_extensionality0000 x) p) as proof of ((p f)->(p g))
% 0.61/0.80  Found (((functional_extensionality000 g) x) p) as proof of ((p f)->(p g))
% 0.61/0.80  Found ((((functional_extensionality00 f) g) x) p) as proof of ((p f)->(p g))
% 0.61/0.80  Found (((((functional_extensionality0 fofType) f) g) x) p) as proof of ((p f)->(p g))
% 0.61/0.80  Found ((((((functional_extensionality fofType) fofType) f) g) x) p) as proof of ((p f)->(p g))
% 0.61/0.80  Found (fun (x:(forall (X:fofType), (((eq fofType) (f X)) (g X))))=> ((((((functional_extensionality fofType) fofType) f) g) x) p)) as proof of ((p f)->(p g))
% 0.61/0.80  Found (fun (x:(forall (X:fofType), (((eq fofType) (f X)) (g X))))=> ((((((functional_extensionality fofType) fofType) f) g) x) p)) as proof of ((forall (X:fofType), (((eq fofType) (f X)) (g X)))->((p f)->(p g)))
% 0.61/0.80  Got proof (fun (x:(forall (X:fofType), (((eq fofType) (f X)) (g X))))=> ((((((functional_extensionality fofType) fofType) f) g) x) p))
% 0.61/0.80  Time elapsed = 0.163856s
% 0.61/0.80  node=36 cost=62.000000 depth=7
% 0.61/0.80  ::::::::::::::::::::::
% 0.61/0.80  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.61/0.80  % SZS output start Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.61/0.80  (fun (x:(forall (X:fofType), (((eq fofType) (f X)) (g X))))=> ((((((functional_extensionality fofType) fofType) f) g) x) p))
% 0.61/0.80  % SZS output end Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------