TSTP Solution File: SYO348^5 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SYO348^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 09:04:05 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.14s 0.40s
% Output : Refutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 5 unt; 1 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 71 ( 17 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 5 avg)
% Number of connectives : 45 ( 8 ~; 0 |; 6 &; 19 @)
% ( 3 <=>; 9 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 4 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 7 ( 7 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 6 ( 3 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 0 ^ 4 !; 2 ?; 6 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(func_def_5,type,
sK0: $o > $o ).
thf(f13,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f12,f10]) ).
thf(f10,plain,
( ( sK0 @ b )
!= $true ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).
thf(f8,plain,
( ( a = b )
& ( ( sK0 @ b )
!= $true )
& ( $true
= ( sK0 @ a ) ) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f6,f7]) ).
thf(f7,plain,
( ? [X0: $o > $o] :
( ( ( X0 @ b )
!= $true )
& ( ( X0 @ a )
= $true ) )
=> ( ( ( sK0 @ b )
!= $true )
& ( $true
= ( sK0 @ a ) ) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
thf(f6,plain,
( ( a = b )
& ? [X0: $o > $o] :
( ( ( X0 @ b )
!= $true )
& ( ( X0 @ a )
= $true ) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).
thf(f5,plain,
~ ( ( a = b )
=> ! [X0: $o > $o] :
( ( ( X0 @ a )
= $true )
=> ( ( X0 @ b )
= $true ) ) ),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4]) ).
thf(f4,plain,
~ ( ( b
<=> a )
=> ! [X0: $o > $o] :
( ( X0 @ a )
=> ( X0 @ b ) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).
thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ( b
<=> a )
=> ! [X0: $o > $o] :
( ( X0 @ a )
=> ( X0 @ b ) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).
thf(f1,conjecture,
( ( b
<=> a )
=> ! [X0: $o > $o] :
( ( X0 @ a )
=> ( X0 @ b ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cE1EXT) ).
thf(f12,plain,
( ( sK0 @ b )
= $true ),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f9,f11]) ).
thf(f11,plain,
a = b,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).
thf(f9,plain,
( $true
= ( sK0 @ a ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : SYO348^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.13/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.38 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.38 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.38 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.38 % DateTime : Mon May 20 09:36:53 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.38 This is a TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR problem
% 0.14/0.38 Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.40 % (16724)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.14/0.40 % (16725)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.14/0.40 % (16721)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 0.14/0.40 % (16726)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 0.14/0.40 % (16727)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 0.14/0.40 % (16723)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 0.14/0.40 % (16721)First to succeed.
% 0.14/0.40 % (16722)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 0.14/0.40 % (16728)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/3Mi)
% 0.14/0.40 % (16726)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.14/0.40 % (16723)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.14/0.40 % (16721)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.14/0.40 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.40 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.40 % (16721)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.40 % (16721)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.40 % (16721)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40 % (16721)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.14/0.40 % (16721)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.40 % (16721)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.14/0.40 % (16721)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.40 % (16721)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.40 % (16720)Success in time 0.007 s
% 0.14/0.40 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------