TSTP Solution File: SYO346^5 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SYO346^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 08:45:40 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.14s 0.39s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 15 ( 3 unt; 3 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 61 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 22 ( 5 avg)
% Number of connectives : 73 ( 24 ~; 22 |; 9 &; 16 @)
% ( 1 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 1 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 4 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 1 ( 1 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 5 ( 3 usr; 4 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 ^ 0 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_22,type,
cB: $o ).
thf(decl_23,type,
cP: $o > $o ).
thf(decl_24,type,
cA: $o ).
thf(cTHM621,conjecture,
( ( cA
<~> cB )
| ~ ( cP @ cA )
| ( cP @ cB ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cTHM621) ).
thf(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ~ ( cA
<=> cB )
| ~ ( ( ~ cA
| ( cP @ $true ) )
& ( cA
| ( cP @ $false ) ) )
| ( ( ~ cB
| ( cP @ $true ) )
& ( cB
| ( cP @ $false ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM621])])]) ).
thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
( ( ~ cA
| cB )
& ( ~ cB
| cA )
& ( ~ cA
| ( cP @ $true ) )
& ( cA
| ( cP @ $false ) )
& ( ~ cB
| cB )
& ( ~ ( cP @ $false )
| cB )
& ( ~ cB
| ~ ( cP @ $true ) )
& ( ~ ( cP @ $false )
| ~ ( cP @ $true ) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])]) ).
thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( ~ cB
| ~ ( cP @ $true ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( ( cP @ $true )
| ~ cA ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( cA
| ~ cB ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( cB
| ~ ( cP @ ~ $true ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( cA
| ( cP @ ~ $true ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ cB,
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),c_0_5]) ).
thf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( cB
| ~ cA ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
cA,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8]) ).
thf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10])]),c_0_8]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.09 % Problem : SYO346^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.04/0.09 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.09/0.29 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.29 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.29 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.29 % DateTime : Mon May 20 08:33:23 EDT 2024
% 0.09/0.29 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.39 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.39 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.39 # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 0.14/0.39 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.39 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.39 # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.39 # Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.39 # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.39 # Starting sh4l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.39 # ehoh_best8_lambda with pid 6343 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.39 # Result found by ehoh_best8_lambda
% 0.14/0.39 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.39 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.39 # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.39 # Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.39 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.39 # Search class: HGHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.39 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.39 # Starting new_ho_10 with 181s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.39 # new_ho_10 with pid 6348 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.39 # Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.14/0.39 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.39 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.39 # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.39 # Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.39 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.39 # Search class: HGHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.39 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.39 # Starting new_ho_10 with 181s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.39 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.14/0.39 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 # Proof found!
% 0.14/0.39 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.14/0.39 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.39 # Parsed axioms : 4
% 0.14/0.39 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # Initial clauses : 11
% 0.14/0.39 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 4
% 0.14/0.39 # Initial clauses in saturation : 7
% 0.14/0.39 # Processed clauses : 16
% 0.14/0.39 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # ...remaining for further processing : 16
% 0.14/0.39 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # Backward-subsumed : 2
% 0.14/0.39 # Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.14/0.39 # Generated clauses : 4
% 0.14/0.39 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3
% 0.14/0.39 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.14/0.39 # Paramodulations : 4
% 0.14/0.39 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # NegExts : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.14/0.39 # ...of those cached : 1
% 0.14/0.39 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.39 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.39 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.39 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.39 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.39 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.39 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.39 # Current number of processed clauses : 4
% 0.14/0.39 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.14/0.39 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.39 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.14/0.39 # Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 0.14/0.39 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.14/0.39 # ...number of literals in the above : 2
% 0.14/0.39 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # Current number of archived clauses : 12
% 0.14/0.39 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
% 0.14/0.39 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.14/0.39 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.14/0.39 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.14/0.39 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.14/0.39 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.14/0.39 # Condensation attempts : 16
% 0.14/0.39 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.14/0.39 # Termbank termtop insertions : 382
% 0.14/0.39 # Search garbage collected termcells : 40
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.39 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.39 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.14/0.39 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.39 # Maximum resident set size: 1592 pages
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.39 # User time : 0.005 s
% 0.14/0.39 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.14/0.39 # Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.14/0.39 # Maximum resident set size: 1692 pages
% 0.14/0.39 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.14/0.40 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------