TSTP Solution File: SYO309^5 by Leo-III-SAT---1.7.12

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III-SAT---1.7.12
% Problem  : SYO309^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 08:59:52 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 19.29s 4.19s
% Output   : Refutation 19.49s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   24
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   48 (  12 unt;   6 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   90 (  22 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  519 (  96   ~;  34   |;   0   &; 386   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   7 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   28 (  28   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    9 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  108 (  30   ^  61   !;  17   ?; 108   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(cS_type,type,
    cS: $i > $i ).

thf(cQ_type,type,
    cQ: $i > $i ).

thf(cR_type,type,
    cR: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(sk1_type,type,
    sk1: ( $i > $o ) > $i ).

thf(sk2_type,type,
    sk2: $i > $i ).

thf(sk3_type,type,
    sk3: $i > $i ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ( ! [A: $i] :
        ( ( ? [B: $i] : ( cR @ A @ ( cQ @ B ) ) )
        = ( ~ ? [B: $i] : ( cR @ ( cS @ A ) @ ( cQ @ B ) ) ) )
   => ? [A: $i > $o] :
      ! [B: $i] :
        ( ( A @ B )
        = ( ~ ( A @ ( cS @ B ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cEO1) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ! [A: $i] :
          ( ( ? [B: $i] : ( cR @ A @ ( cQ @ B ) ) )
          = ( ~ ? [B: $i] : ( cR @ ( cS @ A ) @ ( cQ @ B ) ) ) )
     => ? [A: $i > $o] :
        ! [B: $i] :
          ( ( A @ B )
          = ( ~ ( A @ ( cS @ B ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ~ ( ! [A: $i] :
          ( ( ? [B: $i] : ( cR @ A @ ( cQ @ B ) ) )
          = ( ~ ? [B: $i] : ( cR @ ( cS @ A ) @ ( cQ @ B ) ) ) )
     => ? [A: $i > $o] :
        ! [B: $i] :
          ( ( A @ B )
          = ( ~ ( A @ ( cS @ B ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $o] :
      ( ( A @ ( sk1 @ A ) )
     != ( ~ ( A @ ( cS @ ( sk1 @ A ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[3]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ~ ( A @ ( cS @ ( sk1 @ A ) ) ) )
     != ( A @ ( sk1 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ~ ( A @ ( cS @ ( sk1 @ A ) ) ) )
     != ( A @ ( sk1 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $o] :
      ( ~ ~ ( A @ ( cS @ ( sk1 @ A ) ) )
      | ~ ( A @ ( sk1 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(bool_ext,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $o] :
      ( ~ ( A @ ( sk1 @ A ) )
      | ( A @ ( cS @ ( sk1 @ A ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[9]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ? [B: $i] : ( cR @ A @ ( cQ @ B ) ) )
      = ( ~ ? [B: $i] : ( cR @ ( cS @ A ) @ ( cQ @ B ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[3]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ? [B: $i] : ( cR @ A @ ( cQ @ B ) ) )
      = ( ~ ? [B: $i] : ( cR @ ( cS @ A ) @ ( cQ @ B ) ) ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(14,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ? [B: $i] : ( cR @ A @ ( cQ @ B ) )
      | ~ ~ ? [B: $i] : ( cR @ ( cS @ A ) @ ( cQ @ B ) ) ),
    inference(bool_ext,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(28,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( cR @ ( cS @ A ) @ ( cQ @ ( sk3 @ A ) ) )
      | ( cR @ A @ ( cQ @ ( sk2 @ A ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[14]) ).

thf(13,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ? [B: $i] : ( cR @ A @ ( cQ @ B ) )
      | ~ ? [B: $i] : ( cR @ ( cS @ A ) @ ( cQ @ B ) ) ),
    inference(bool_ext,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(27,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( cR @ ( cS @ A ) @ ( cQ @ C ) )
      | ~ ( cR @ A @ ( cQ @ B ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[13]) ).

thf(588,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( cR @ A @ ( cQ @ ( sk2 @ A ) ) )
      | ~ ( cR @ B @ ( cQ @ C ) )
      | ( ( cR @ ( cS @ A ) @ ( cQ @ ( sk3 @ A ) ) )
       != ( cR @ ( cS @ B ) @ ( cQ @ D ) ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[28,27]) ).

thf(589,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( cR @ B @ ( cQ @ ( sk2 @ B ) ) )
      | ~ ( cR @ B @ ( cQ @ A ) ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[588:[bind(A,$thf( E )),bind(B,$thf( E )),bind(C,$thf( C )),bind(D,$thf( sk3 @ E ))]]) ).

thf(619,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( cR @ B @ ( cQ @ ( sk2 @ B ) ) )
      | ~ ( cR @ B @ ( cQ @ A ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[589]) ).

thf(753,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( cR @ A @ ( cQ @ ( sk2 @ A ) ) )
      | ( cR @ C @ ( cQ @ ( sk2 @ C ) ) )
      | ( ( cR @ ( cS @ A ) @ ( cQ @ ( sk3 @ A ) ) )
       != ( cR @ C @ ( cQ @ B ) ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[28,619]) ).

thf(754,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( cR @ A @ ( cQ @ ( sk2 @ A ) ) )
      | ( cR @ ( cS @ A ) @ ( cQ @ ( sk2 @ ( cS @ A ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[753:[bind(A,$thf( E )),bind(B,$thf( sk3 @ E )),bind(C,$thf( cS @ E ))]]) ).

thf(798,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( cR @ A @ ( cQ @ ( sk2 @ A ) ) )
      | ( cR @ ( cS @ A ) @ ( cQ @ ( sk2 @ ( cS @ A ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[754]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $o] :
      ( ~ ( A @ ( cS @ ( sk1 @ A ) ) )
      | ( A @ ( sk1 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(bool_ext,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(12,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $o] :
      ( ( A @ ( sk1 @ A ) )
      | ~ ( A @ ( cS @ ( sk1 @ A ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[10]) ).

thf(216,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $o] :
      ( ~ ( A
          @ ( sk1
            @ ^ [B: $i] :
                ~ ( A @ B ) ) )
      | ~ ~ ( A
            @ ( cS
              @ ( sk1
                @ ^ [B: $i] :
                    ~ ( A @ B ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(prim_subst,[status(thm)],[12:[bind(A,$thf( ^ [C: $i] : ~ ( B @ C ) ))]]) ).

thf(243,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $o] :
      ( ( A
        @ ( cS
          @ ( sk1
            @ ^ [B: $i] :
                ~ ( A @ B ) ) ) )
      | ~ ( A
          @ ( sk1
            @ ^ [B: $i] :
                ~ ( A @ B ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[216]) ).

thf(244,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $o] :
      ( ( A
        @ ( cS
          @ ( sk1
            @ ^ [B: $i] :
                ~ ( A @ B ) ) ) )
      | ~ ( A
          @ ( sk1
            @ ^ [B: $i] :
                ~ ( A @ B ) ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[243]) ).

thf(355,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $o] :
      ( ~ ( A
          @ ( sk1
            @ ^ [B: $i] :
                ~ ( A @ B ) ) )
      | ( ( A
          @ ( cS
            @ ( sk1
              @ ^ [B: $i] :
                  ~ ( A @ B ) ) ) )
       != ( ~ ( A
              @ ( sk1
                @ ^ [B: $i] :
                    ~ ( A @ B ) ) ) ) )
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(eqfactor_ordered,[status(thm)],[244]) ).

thf(408,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $o] :
      ( ~ ( A
          @ ( sk1
            @ ^ [B: $i] :
                ~ ( A @ B ) ) )
      | ( ( A
          @ ( cS
            @ ( sk1
              @ ^ [B: $i] :
                  ~ ( A @ B ) ) ) )
       != ( ~ ( A
              @ ( sk1
                @ ^ [B: $i] :
                    ~ ( A @ B ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[355]) ).

thf(542,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $o] :
      ( ~ ~ ( A
            @ ( sk1
              @ ^ [B: $i] :
                  ~ ~ ( A @ B ) ) )
      | ( ( ~ ( A
              @ ( cS
                @ ( sk1
                  @ ^ [B: $i] :
                      ~ ~ ( A @ B ) ) ) ) )
       != ( ~ ~ ( A
                @ ( sk1
                  @ ^ [B: $i] :
                      ~ ~ ( A @ B ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(prim_subst,[status(thm)],[408:[bind(A,$thf( ^ [C: $i] : ~ ( B @ C ) ))]]) ).

thf(579,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( ~ ( A
              @ ( cS
                @ ( sk1
                  @ ^ [B: $i] :
                      ~ ~ ( A @ B ) ) ) ) )
       != ( ~ ~ ( A
                @ ( sk1
                  @ ^ [B: $i] :
                      ~ ~ ( A @ B ) ) ) ) )
      | ( A
        @ ( sk1
          @ ^ [B: $i] :
              ~ ~ ( A @ B ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[542]) ).

thf(580,plain,
    ! [A: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( ~ ( A @ ( cS @ ( sk1 @ A ) ) ) )
       != ( A @ ( sk1 @ A ) ) )
      | ( A @ ( sk1 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[579]) ).

thf(1507,plain,
    ! [B: $i > $o,A: $i] :
      ( ( cR @ A @ ( cQ @ ( sk2 @ A ) ) )
      | ( B @ ( sk1 @ B ) )
      | ( ( cR @ ( cS @ A ) @ ( cQ @ ( sk2 @ ( cS @ A ) ) ) )
       != ( B @ ( cS @ ( sk1 @ B ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[798,580]) ).

thf(1545,plain,
    ( ( cR
      @ ( sk1
        @ ^ [A: $i] : ( cR @ A @ ( cQ @ ( sk2 @ A ) ) ) )
      @ ( cQ
        @ ( sk2
          @ ( sk1
            @ ^ [A: $i] : ( cR @ A @ ( cQ @ ( sk2 @ A ) ) ) ) ) ) )
    | ( cR
      @ ( sk1
        @ ^ [A: $i] : ( cR @ A @ ( cQ @ ( sk2 @ A ) ) ) )
      @ ( cQ
        @ ( sk2
          @ ( sk1
            @ ^ [A: $i] : ( cR @ A @ ( cQ @ ( sk2 @ A ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(pre_uni,[status(thm)],[1507:[bind(A,$thf( sk1 @ ^ [C: $i] : ( cR @ C @ ( cQ @ ( sk2 @ C ) ) ) )),bind(B,$thf( ^ [C: $i] : ( cR @ C @ ( cQ @ ( sk2 @ C ) ) ) ))]]) ).

thf(1578,plain,
    ( cR
    @ ( sk1
      @ ^ [A: $i] : ( cR @ A @ ( cQ @ ( sk2 @ A ) ) ) )
    @ ( cQ
      @ ( sk2
        @ ( sk1
          @ ^ [A: $i] : ( cR @ A @ ( cQ @ ( sk2 @ A ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[1545]) ).

thf(756,plain,
    ! [E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( cR @ B @ ( cQ @ A ) )
      | ~ ( cR @ C @ ( cQ @ D ) )
      | ( ( cR @ B @ ( cQ @ ( sk2 @ B ) ) )
       != ( cR @ ( cS @ C ) @ ( cQ @ E ) ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[619,27]) ).

thf(757,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( cR @ ( cS @ C ) @ ( cQ @ A ) )
      | ~ ( cR @ C @ ( cQ @ B ) ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[756:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( cS @ H )),bind(C,$thf( H )),bind(D,$thf( D )),bind(E,$thf( sk2 @ ( cS @ H ) ))]]) ).

thf(801,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( cR @ ( cS @ C ) @ ( cQ @ A ) )
      | ~ ( cR @ C @ ( cQ @ B ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[757]) ).

thf(1638,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( cR @ ( cS @ C ) @ ( cQ @ A ) )
      | ( ( cR
          @ ( sk1
            @ ^ [D: $i] : ( cR @ D @ ( cQ @ ( sk2 @ D ) ) ) )
          @ ( cQ
            @ ( sk2
              @ ( sk1
                @ ^ [D: $i] : ( cR @ D @ ( cQ @ ( sk2 @ D ) ) ) ) ) ) )
       != ( cR @ C @ ( cQ @ B ) ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[1578,801]) ).

thf(1639,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( cR
        @ ( cS
          @ ( sk1
            @ ^ [B: $i] : ( cR @ B @ ( cQ @ ( sk2 @ B ) ) ) ) )
        @ ( cQ @ A ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[1638:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( sk2 @ ( sk1 @ ^ [D: $i] : ( cR @ D @ ( cQ @ ( sk2 @ D ) ) ) ) )),bind(C,$thf( sk1 @ ^ [D: $i] : ( cR @ D @ ( cQ @ ( sk2 @ D ) ) ) ))]]) ).

thf(1656,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i > $o] :
      ( ~ ( A @ ( sk1 @ A ) )
      | ( ( A @ ( cS @ ( sk1 @ A ) ) )
       != ( cR
          @ ( cS
            @ ( sk1
              @ ^ [C: $i] : ( cR @ C @ ( cQ @ ( sk2 @ C ) ) ) ) )
          @ ( cQ @ B ) ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[11,1639]) ).

thf(1664,plain,
    ~ ( cR
      @ ( sk1
        @ ^ [A: $i] : ( cR @ A @ ( cQ @ ( sk2 @ A ) ) ) )
      @ ( cQ
        @ ( sk2
          @ ( sk1
            @ ^ [A: $i] : ( cR @ A @ ( cQ @ ( sk2 @ A ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(pre_uni,[status(thm)],[1656:[bind(A,$thf( ^ [C: $i] : ( cR @ C @ ( cQ @ ( sk2 @ C ) ) ) )),bind(B,$thf( sk2 @ ( cS @ ( sk1 @ ^ [C: $i] : ( cR @ C @ ( cQ @ ( sk2 @ C ) ) ) ) ) ))]]) ).

thf(1729,plain,
    ~ $true,
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[1664,1578]) ).

thf(1730,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[1729]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.13  % Problem  : SYO309^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.15/0.16  % Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d
% 0.15/0.37  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.38  % DateTime : Mon May 20 09:29:24 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.97/0.89  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.19/1.00  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (103ms). 
% 1.19/1.00  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.58/1.23  % [INFO] 	 nitpick registered as external prover. 
% 1.58/1.23  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 1.75/1.29  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 1.75/1.31  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 1.90/1.31  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 1.90/1.31  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 1.90/1.31  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 19.29/4.18  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 19.29/4.18  % Time passed: 3638ms (effective reasoning time: 3173ms)
% 19.29/4.18  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 19.29/4.18  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 19.29/4.18  % No. of inferences in proof: 42
% 19.29/4.19  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 3638 ms resp. 3173 ms w/o parsing
% 19.49/4.24  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 19.49/4.24  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------