TSTP Solution File: SYO306^5 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SYO306^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 09:03:54 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.14s 0.39s
% Output : Refutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SYO306^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.37 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.37 % DateTime : Mon May 20 09:20:23 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.37 This is a TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR problem
% 0.14/0.37 Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.39 % (12391)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 0.14/0.39 % (12393)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 0.14/0.39 % (12392)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 0.14/0.39 % (12394)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.14/0.39 % (12396)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 0.14/0.39 % (12397)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 0.14/0.39 % (12395)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.14/0.39 % (12394)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.39 % (12394)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.39 % (12394)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.39 % (12394)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.39 % (12394)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.14/0.39 % (12395)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.39 % (12395)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.39 % (12395)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.39 % (12395)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.39 % (12395)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 % (12395)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.14/0.39 % (12395)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.39 % (12395)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.14/0.39 % (12395)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.39 % (12395)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 % (12394)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.14/0.39 % (12394)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.39 % (12394)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.14/0.39 % (12394)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.39 % (12394)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.39 % (12391)First to succeed.
% 0.14/0.39 % (12397)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.14/0.39 % (12391)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.14/0.39 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.39 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.39 thf(func_def_0, type, cT: $i > $o).
% 0.14/0.39 thf(func_def_1, type, cS: $i > $o).
% 0.14/0.39 thf(func_def_5, type, sK0: ($i > $o) > $i).
% 0.14/0.39 thf(f18,plain,(
% 0.14/0.39 $false),
% 0.14/0.39 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f17])).
% 0.14/0.39 thf(f17,plain,(
% 0.14/0.39 ($true != $true)),
% 0.14/0.39 inference(superposition,[],[f16,f14])).
% 0.14/0.39 thf(f14,plain,(
% 0.14/0.39 ( ! [X3 : $i] : (($true = (cS @ X3))) )),
% 0.14/0.39 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11])).
% 0.14/0.39 thf(f11,plain,(
% 0.14/0.39 ! [X0 : $i > $o] : (! [X1] : ((X0 @ X1) = $true) | ((X0 @ (sK0 @ X0)) != $true)) & ! [X3] : (($true = (cS @ X3)) & ($true = (cT @ X3))) & (((cT @ sK1) != $true) | ((cS @ sK1) != $true))),
% 0.14/0.39 inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f8,f10,f9])).
% 0.14/0.39 thf(f9,plain,(
% 0.14/0.39 ! [X0 : $i > $o] : (? [X2] : ((X0 @ X2) != $true) => ((X0 @ (sK0 @ X0)) != $true))),
% 0.14/0.39 introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
% 0.14/0.39 thf(f10,plain,(
% 0.14/0.39 ? [X4] : (($true != (cT @ X4)) | ((cS @ X4) != $true)) => (((cT @ sK1) != $true) | ((cS @ sK1) != $true))),
% 0.14/0.39 introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
% 0.14/0.39 thf(f8,plain,(
% 0.14/0.39 ! [X0 : $i > $o] : (! [X1] : ((X0 @ X1) = $true) | ? [X2] : ((X0 @ X2) != $true)) & ! [X3] : (($true = (cS @ X3)) & ($true = (cT @ X3))) & ? [X4] : (($true != (cT @ X4)) | ((cS @ X4) != $true))),
% 0.14/0.39 inference(rectify,[],[f7])).
% 0.14/0.39 thf(f7,plain,(
% 0.14/0.39 ! [X0 : $i > $o] : (! [X2] : ((X0 @ X2) = $true) | ? [X1] : ((X0 @ X1) != $true)) & ! [X3] : (($true = (cS @ X3)) & ($true = (cT @ X3))) & ? [X4] : (($true != (cT @ X4)) | ((cS @ X4) != $true))),
% 0.14/0.39 inference(flattening,[],[f6])).
% 0.14/0.39 thf(f6,plain,(
% 0.14/0.39 (? [X4] : (($true != (cT @ X4)) | ((cS @ X4) != $true)) & ! [X3] : (($true = (cS @ X3)) & ($true = (cT @ X3)))) & ! [X0 : $i > $o] : (! [X2] : ((X0 @ X2) = $true) | ? [X1] : ((X0 @ X1) != $true))),
% 0.14/0.39 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5])).
% 0.14/0.39 thf(f5,plain,(
% 0.14/0.39 ~(! [X0 : $i > $o] : (! [X1] : ((X0 @ X1) = $true) => ! [X2] : ((X0 @ X2) = $true)) => (! [X3] : (($true = (cS @ X3)) & ($true = (cT @ X3))) => ! [X4] : (((cS @ X4) = $true) & ($true = (cT @ X4)))))),
% 0.14/0.39 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4])).
% 0.14/0.39 thf(f4,plain,(
% 0.14/0.39 ~(! [X0 : $i > $o] : (! [X1] : (X0 @ X1) => ! [X2] : (X0 @ X2)) => (! [X3] : ((cS @ X3) & (cT @ X3)) => ! [X4] : ((cS @ X4) & (cT @ X4))))),
% 0.14/0.39 inference(rectify,[],[f2])).
% 0.14/0.39 thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.14/0.39 ~(! [X0 : $i > $o] : (! [X1] : (X0 @ X1) => ! [X1] : (X0 @ X1)) => (! [X1] : ((cS @ X1) & (cT @ X1)) => ! [X1] : ((cS @ X1) & (cT @ X1))))),
% 0.14/0.39 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1])).
% 0.14/0.39 thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 0.14/0.39 ! [X0 : $i > $o] : (! [X1] : (X0 @ X1) => ! [X1] : (X0 @ X1)) => (! [X1] : ((cS @ X1) & (cT @ X1)) => ! [X1] : ((cS @ X1) & (cT @ X1)))),
% 0.14/0.39 file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cDUP_BUG_2)).
% 0.14/0.39 thf(f16,plain,(
% 0.14/0.39 ((cS @ sK1) != $true)),
% 0.14/0.39 inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f12,f13])).
% 0.14/0.39 thf(f13,plain,(
% 0.14/0.39 ( ! [X3 : $i] : (($true = (cT @ X3))) )),
% 0.14/0.39 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11])).
% 0.14/0.39 thf(f12,plain,(
% 0.14/0.39 ((cS @ sK1) != $true) | ((cT @ sK1) != $true)),
% 0.14/0.39 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11])).
% 0.14/0.39 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.39 % (12391)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.39 % (12391)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.39 % (12391)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 % (12391)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.14/0.39 % (12391)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.39 % (12391)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.14/0.39 % (12391)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.39 % (12391)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.39 % (12390)Success in time 0.005 s
% 0.14/0.39 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------