TSTP Solution File: SYO299^5 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SYO299^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 08:45:33 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.22s 0.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 3 unt; 3 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 31 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 20 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 55 ( 18 ~; 20 |; 7 &; 0 @)
% ( 8 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 4 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 4 ( 3 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 0 ^ 7 !; 2 ?; 9 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_22,type,
epred1_0: $o ).
thf(decl_23,type,
epred2_0: $o ).
thf(decl_24,type,
epred3_0: $o ).
thf(cTHM51,conjecture,
! [X1: $o,X2: $o,X3: $o] :
? [X4: $o] :
( ( ( X1
<=> X2 )
<=> X3 )
=> ( X1
<=> ( X2
<=> X4 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cTHM51) ).
thf(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1: $o,X2: $o,X3: $o] :
? [X4: $o] :
( ( ( X1
<=> X2 )
<=> X3 )
=> ( X1
<=> ( X2
<=> X4 ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM51]) ).
thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
! [X12: $o] :
( ( ~ epred1_0
| ~ epred2_0
| epred3_0 )
& ( epred1_0
| epred2_0
| epred3_0 )
& ( ~ epred1_0
| epred2_0
| ~ epred3_0 )
& ( ~ epred2_0
| epred1_0
| ~ epred3_0 )
& ( ~ epred2_0
| ~ X12
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( epred2_0
| X12
| ~ epred1_0 )
& ( ~ epred2_0
| X12
| epred1_0 )
& ( ~ X12
| epred2_0
| epred1_0 ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( epred1_0
| ~ epred2_0 ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).
thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( epred2_0
| epred1_0 ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).
thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( ~ epred2_0
| ~ epred1_0 ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).
thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
epred1_0,
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]) ).
thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( epred2_0
| ~ epred1_0 ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).
thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ epred2_0,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6])]) ).
thf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_6])]),c_0_8]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : SYO299^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.37 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.37 % DateTime : Mon May 20 08:48:38 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.48 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.49 # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 0.22/0.49 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.49 # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.49 # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.49 # Starting sh4l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.49 # Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_rwall with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.49 # ho_unfolding_6 with pid 1254 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Result found by ho_unfolding_6
% 0.22/0.49 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.49 # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.49 # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.49 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.22/0.49 # Search class: HGHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.49 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.49 # Starting new_ho_10 with 181s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.49 # new_ho_10 with pid 1258 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.22/0.49 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.49 # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.49 # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.49 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.22/0.49 # Search class: HGHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.49 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.49 # Starting new_ho_10 with 181s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.22/0.49 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.22/0.49
% 0.22/0.49 # Proof found!
% 0.22/0.49 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/0.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.49 # Parsed axioms : 1
% 0.22/0.49 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Initial clauses : 8
% 0.22/0.49 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Initial clauses in saturation : 8
% 0.22/0.49 # Processed clauses : 4
% 0.22/0.49 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # ...remaining for further processing : 3
% 0.22/0.49 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.22/0.49 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.22/0.49 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # NegExts : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.22/0.49 # ...of those cached : 1
% 0.22/0.49 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.49 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.49 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.49 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.49 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.49 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.49 # Current number of processed clauses : 2
% 0.22/0.49 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.22/0.49 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.22/0.49 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4
% 0.22/0.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 12
% 0.22/0.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.22/0.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
% 0.22/0.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.22/0.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.22/0.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.22/0.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.22/0.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.22/0.49 # Condensation attempts : 4
% 0.22/0.49 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 633
% 0.22/0.49 # Search garbage collected termcells : 226
% 0.22/0.49
% 0.22/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.49 # User time : 0.000 s
% 0.22/0.49 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.49 # Total time : 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1768 pages
% 0.22/0.49
% 0.22/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.49 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.22/0.49 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.22/0.49 # Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.22/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1668 pages
% 0.22/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.22/0.49 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------